Slashdot Mirror


Pitfalls of Automated Bill Payment

theodp writes "A few months ago, the NY Times' Ron Lieber extolled the virtues of allowing utilities, phone, and credit card companies to pull whatever you owe from your bank account. Big mistake. Lieber's readers fired back, telling him he was out of his mind for suggesting that they give billers unfettered access to their credit cards and bank accounts. Now Lieber goes through five of the glitches that can occur with any of the various methods of setting up automatic payments: 'You can give each biller permission to pull the full amount from your bank account. You can use the online bill system at your bank to push payments out automatically each month. Or you can charge every bill to your credit card and give only that card company permission to pull money from your bank account when the credit card bill is due. Each of these methods has its potential shortcomings ...'" What kind of payment automation do you use, and why?

9 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. I don't. by Leptok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    End of story. Why give them the access when it takes 10 minutes to simply do it myself?

  2. One-Time Payment by Bardez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every time I log in to any online payable account, they neg me to set up automatic bill payments. But personally, it's worth the half-hour to an hour of my time -once a month- to fill out an online form. Why would I give anyone unfettered access to my money? What if I have some sort of emergency crop up? I have heard numerous times from co-workers how the automatic deduction will roll out way too early (three weeks ahead of schedule at one point), causing overdraft fees that are entirely the deductor's fault. If they fuck up, the corporate machine would take months if not years to settle any kind of litigation in the event that their customer service department does not agree with my claims. I'll do the one-time payments, thanks. I figure it's worth the hour to control when and where I disperse my money.

    --
    Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
  3. Re:I pay online by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I use the "get my ass to the post office method. I'd pay online, but Korea uses an ActiveX plugin instead of SSL. Even if I had ActiveX, there's no way I'd do that.

  4. Own bank's bill-pay system by LoadWB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use my own bank's bill-pay system, because they take all responsibility. If it says a check is to be to my electric company by the 15th and it isn't, THE BANK calls the electric company and explains the situation, then deposits any late fees into my account.

    In the past using my billers' systems has been a nightmare or two.

    One double-billed me one month and would not refund the second billing because my next bill would be due by the time the return would process. The bank could not reverse the charge because the payment came in with my authorization.

    I've had more than one bill me too early.

    And recently my cell phone bill was over $500 in error two months in a row because of a missing billing code on my data plan. All sorts of fecal matter would have hit the fan if those payments had been automatically debited.

    And other incidents of which I cannot recall the details.

    Unless the biller is willing to take responsibility for errors on its end and IMMEDIATELY return money taken in error, as well as cover whatever fees or damages are incurred due to the error, payments come via bank bill-pay only. And if that is not acceptable, then the account gets closed and I move on.

  5. Re:Automated payments destroy jobs by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is bad how? I'm sure buggy-whip and horseshoe makers bemoaned the loss of their jobs with the advent of that new-fangled motorcar gadget. I'm sure those debt collectors can adapt.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  6. Re:Verizon by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody has access to any of my accounts but myself. Not even my wife.

    I hope you've got things sorted out well for emergencies. Somebody has power of attorney, yes?

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  7. The fact is, US banking is backward by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Speaking as someone who has been a local director of a US corporation and then a general manager in a company with a US subsidiary, the biggest issues are simply that US banks are technically backward compared to Europe, and that you have no Data Protection Act.

    In the US it has been made very easy to set up a bank -with the result that many people, some with fraudulent intentions, do just that. (At the other end of the scale I know of a small community of professional people that set up its own bank just because they didn't trust the big ones, and it was very successful. I am not suggesting that Americans are less honest than Europeans, that is far from the truth.) In Europe the banking system has deep roots in the Jewish community becaue Jews were discriminated against - they could not own land but were allowed to charge interest - and this tension has created what is, on the whole, a very successful and honest banking system. (In fact in the UK banks were also started by nonconformists like Quakers for much the same reason - Barclays being an example.)

    The result is that until the madness of the last ten years our banking system was very trustworthy and we were prepared to believe in direct debit systems - which on the whole work very well. Meanwhile in the US banks were still settling interbank transfers with bits of paper, and this is still an issue today - in Chicago we had to set up an account with a subsidiary of the (British) NatWest just to avoid ludicrous delays and overcharging for simple transactions. This is ultimately because in the UK many bankers knew they were less than honest, and so were not inclined to trust other banks. The present credit crisis is because, after years of unregulated credit and junk assets, banks have discovered once again that they cannot trust one another. Paypal is an example of a system that was set up to deal with what is really a US problem, not a general problem.

    The answer to direct debits is to make the system as robust as European systems - which make the person asking for the money extremely liable if they make a mistake. But this is unlikely to happen, because US law favours corporations over individuals. And, given Obama's choice of running mate and his connections, voting either way in November won't have any effect.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:The fact is, US banking is backward by Peeteriz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the reasons for the European situation are not because EU banks behave better - it's because of heavy-handed intervention from the governments to protect consumers.

      All these benefits of EU Direct Debit system(s) that make it good for the customer (instantly reverse payments weeks after they have been debited, authorisation requirements, fee and float limits) are not due to goodwill, but due to requirements set by initiatives such as EU Payment Service Directive and SEPA. The situation would me much more in favor of the billing companies' and bank fee-income (like in USA) if it were driven purely by free market.

  8. Re:D'uh by cecil_turtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly, I have a dedicated credit card just for bill payments that gets fully paid off each month. It allows the automatic payments to be set up, but acts as a buffer to my bank account in case of an error, plus I get to defer payment for 25 days or whatever. Finally, the credit card I use for this is a cash-back card, so I effectively reduce all of my bills by 1%. Billers that don't support credit card payments I use online banking to send a check. I've been a victim of one of those 38-in-100,000 billing errors, I had a DSL company once withdraw $1,300 instead of $56 because of a "glitch" in their system. If that happened against my bank account it would have been a much larger problem.