Slashdot Mirror


Businesses Choosing "Community" Linux Distros

An anonymous reader sends along a PCWorld recap of a new study by the 451 Group, which claims that business use of 'community' Linux distributions is on the rise — distros like Ubuntu, CentOS, and Debian, as opposed to "corporate" packages like RHEL and Suse. The trend is most evident in Europe. The article points out examples in Sweden and Germany, and cites growing in-house expertise with Linux as one factor helping enterprises get comfortable choosing Linux distros without commercial support. Interestingly, the Swedish company mentioned, Blocket.se, has made a one-off support arrangement with their hardware vendor HP: "HP is really providing device driver and utility support it uses for customers running RHEL, but because the two distributions are binary-compatible, that support approach works just fine for CentOS. Blocket relies on its own engineers, systems administration, and software development to get its applications running on Linux. "

8 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. I saw that on a supermarket chain by Night64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Brazil, some times companies use Debian as their main SO, and hire their own support.

    --
    Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
    1. Re:I saw that on a supermarket chain by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I must confess I have no idea how much "enterprise" distro charge for support, but I think that if companies are starting to use their own support, it must not be cheap. Maybe this should send a message to RH and company

      Depends on the context. If - as we do - you only use RHEL because you need a certified platform for some other obscenely expensive piece of software (eg: Oracle), then the cost of RH's licensing is basically irrelevant.

    2. Re:I saw that on a supermarket chain by Night64 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I don't know what the prices are around the world, but in Brazil SuSe support prices are not particulary cheap. US$ 5000,00 per machine, on a 3-year contract with priority support, 24x7.

      In Brazil, some times companies use Debian as their main SO, and hire their own support.

      I must confess I have no idea how much "enterprise" distro charge for support, but I think that if companies are starting to use their own support, it must not be cheap. Maybe this should send a message to RH and company

      --
      Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
  2. Works for us by drsmithy · · Score: 5, Informative

    We use CentOS on pretty much all our 150-odd Linux servers, except for those that require RHEL to be in a supported configuration (Oracle DB, Oracle Appserver, Oracle Financials).

    Of course, while we mainly do this to save money, out of the million-plus we pay Oracle, the few thousand in RHEL licenses doesn't even count as a rounding error (hell, compared to Oracle licensing, even the cost of the hardware is irrelevant).

  3. Re:New Business Model? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not all certifications are useless. As a case in point, consider the fundamentals of engineering exam and the certification one gets from it, "licensed professional engineer." Passing that test is no joke, and LPE's are generally the sort of people you want to hire for engineering work (in some places, they are the only people you can legally hire).

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  4. Re:RedHat and SuSE's strategy backfiring... by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

    SUSE has always been free for download. In the beginning it was free 2 months after the boxed version. This has changed when Novell took over. They also have put YaST under complete GPL as well.

    Now there is a more clear difference between the community distribution and the corporate one. SUSE is corporate, openSUSE is community/

    Both can be downloaded for free. For SUSE the (security-)updates need to be payed. For openSUSE they are free.

    Oh and it hasn't been SuSE for a long while now.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  5. Re:Linux at the bottom, Mac OSX at the top by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google does corporate email accounts - http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/index.html . I'm kind of hoping the OP meant one of those.

    --
    "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
  6. Works For Us ... by saltydog56 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Several years ago we here at NASA replaced Solaris X86 with Red Hat Linux as the operating system for our PCS systems (Thinkpad laptops used as the crew interface in the Space Station's command and control systems) We are currently in the process of rehosting again, this time to Scientific Linux, a CentOS-like rebuild of RHEL done by the good folks up at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. Certainly cost was a factor, but not the deciding one. From our perspective it is golden not to have to track how many laptops each of the various development groups (many of which are international) have it loaded on.