Slashdot Mirror


Google Chrome, Day 2

Seems that almost every story submitted to Slashdot last night in some way involved Google's Chrome that we started talking about yesterday. Dotan Cohen noted that according to Clicky Chrome has hit 3% browser share. Since Google has decided to release Chrome only for Windows, I now share for you 3 reviews written by others: the first comes from alexy2k, the second from mildsiete, and the third from oli4uk. They all seem to feature various opinions, charts, and screenshots demonstrating various exciting points.

27 of 1,016 comments (clear)

  1. Re:A couple of annoying things I've found so far by Kagura · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, wow! So that's where they hid "reopen closed tabs" at! Thank you so much!

  2. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, you found the comic entertaining? I've got some buckets of paint that are going up on walls soon. Want to buy some tickets for the drying? Only $5 for the lawn tickets, $20 for the reserved seating.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  3. Re:28 hours old, already double that of Opera. by Kagura · · Score: 2, Funny

    No AdBlock is available yet, I'm afraid. Other people are equally surprised. :)

  4. Re:just curiousity by Kagura · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google Chrome: Day 2, article number four. :)

  5. Re:Google spying on you by flynns · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, uh, what happens if someone else logs into their google account, then?

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  6. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's basically the same UA string as Safari. IE pretends to be Mozilla, Safari pretends to be Gecko and KHTML, Chrome pretends to be Safari.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. Re:NetApplications shows 1% share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hell, gmail is still in beta. If that's any indicator, the beta period for Chrome will be a couple of years...

  8. Re:Google spying on you by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I guess this'll make getting a job at Google interesting...

  9. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's dotslash?

  10. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Funny

    It won't be long, someone will use the code-base and make a less snooping type browser from it, adding it's new name. Perhaps, all shiny or some such.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  11. Re:Firefox Fanboys Are Shitting Themselves by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We are so, so happy with Google Chrome," mumbled Mozilla CEO John Lilly through gritted teeth. "That most of our income is from Google has no bearing on me making this statement."

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  12. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the Soviet Russian port of slashdot

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  13. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's dotslash?

    It's the residual version of slashdot where all the adverts which were blocked from slashdot by adblock go. They have to go somewhere or the tubes would get full up and burst.

  14. Better come out with a Linux port by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google Chrome is so good, it may actually make me delete my Linux partition to load up Vista. If the standard notion of a client u/i was alive before, it is surely dead now. Chrome is a game changer and this release of a web browser may well exceed the impact of the original Netscape...

    It's remarkable, how fast it is.

    --
    This is my sig.
  15. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by DisKurzion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed. I often want a lot of my data stored for simple convenience, but incognito lets me browse "undesirable" sites without clearing all of my data after the fact.

    As soon as Stumbleupon is released for Chrome, it could very well be my primary browser.

  16. Re:DO NOT READ 3rd link by D+Ninja · · Score: 3, Funny

    There was an article?

  17. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by Varun+Soundararajan · · Score: 3, Funny

    you are a spoilt unix user its /. and not ./

  18. Re:A couple of annoying things I've found so far by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Funny

    You want to see something even scarier?!?

    Simply press ctl-shift-home-alt-up-F4-F8-F12, tab twice, open and close your cdrom three times, hold scroll lock for 8 seconds, press crl-backspace, tab two more times and then click here.

    --
    When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
  19. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by g0dsp33d · · Score: 4, Funny

    2. There are ads on ./!!

    There are adds on run last command?

    Or is this a clever way of buffer overrun for /.ers reading off of lynx?

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
  20. Re:I'll stick with Firefox by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Worst "profit" joke ever.

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  21. I have nothing to contribute to this discussion by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny
    But that's not going to stop me posting to slashdot because I'm part of the *me* generation and I think my opinions need to be heard by everyone.

    Anyway, I don't know anything about Chrome. Apparently, whatever it is, there isn't a version for my platform, so I'm not going to download it. I know that's just a fact about me, but you all need to hear it. I'm not going to download it, I say. And because the whole universe is based on my experience I can categorically say that this means that Chrome has lost the browser war. So obviously Google have screwed up their strategy royally because if I don't want to download Chrome, why would anyone else?

    Apparently it doesn't have adblock. I don't know what adblock is, but from reading the other comments it's obviously the most important part of a browser. How could Google leave it out?

    Anyway, I've said my piece. Google are a doomed company. In fact, here's a graph to prove it:

    | /
    | ___/
    |/
    +------

    You can't argue with statistics!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I have nothing to contribute to this discussion by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1, Funny

      For God's sake people. The guy's absolutely right. Mod me back down!

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  22. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by Machtyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was a meta-review.

  23. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by COMON$ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ditto! Wow you actually do find useful stuff on /. Only too me 6 years to find that out.... :)

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  24. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Won't somebody think of the ads!

  25. Re:Non-Tech Percent of Web Traffic from Chrome by jeebusroxors · · Score: 2, Funny

    CONGRATULATIONS You have been selected to receive two free ipod nanos

  26. The perfect Slashdot article. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, and I forgot to ask - why has Taco linked to a "review" by someone who openly admits to not having even downloaded the product!?

    What's wrong with that?

    Nothing's more intellectually consistent on Slashdot than an editor posting a link to an article they didn't read for viewers of the site who have no intention of reading it about a product that the reviewer didn't even look at.

    The fact that 2 of 3 links are dead and the other hangs up my browswer only puts the cherry on top!

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").