Slashdot Mirror


Google Turns 10

Ian Lamont writes "It was on September 7, 1998 that Larry Page and Sergey Brin founded Google Inc., aiming to provide a better search engine. You can see what it looked like here. Google had a relatively good search engine technology that succeeded in burying many late 1990s competitors, and it eventually developed a successful advertising model and pledged to operate on a 'don't be evil' philosophy. The company now has nearly 20,000 employees and a $150 billion market value, and has been acquiring or developing a host of groundbreaking technologies. When did you start using its search engine? Is the world a better place because of Google?"

25 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. pictures by toby · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those curious, like I was, here are the original Google server pictures missing from the Wayback Machine's archive.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:pictures by Bazman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, until I looked at those pics I didn't realise 'Google!' was an anagram of 'Go Lego!'

    2. Re:pictures by miller60 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even better. Here's a pictorial history of Google's servers (be sure to scroll down).

    3. Re:pictures by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For those curious, like I was, here are the original Google server pictures missing from the Wayback Machine's archive.

      And if you're ever in Mountain View, CA, you can see one the first production server racks from 1999, as well as the Lego (actually Duplo) blocks that housed the original 1998 beta server shown in your link.

      The artifacts can be viewed by the public at the Computer History Museum, along with everything from a Difference Engine, an Enigma machine, parts of ENIAC, numerous Crays, a restored and working PDP-1, an Apple I, and pretty much everything else you can imagine.

      No visit to the Bay Area is complete without a trip to the Computer History Museum.

    4. Re:pictures by 32771 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh that reminds me:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microserfs

      I wonder whether it inspired anyone.

      --
      Je me souviens.
  2. Deja News by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I started using Google when it bought Deja News which was the only good place to find a broad selection of technical information on the web. I guess I just defaulted to Google as a search engine after that.

    1. Re:Deja News by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There was no one search engine that I used until somebody at work told me about Google (early 2001). Lycos, Dogpile, AltaVista, Yahoo, etc and so on all come to mind. There was no "loyalty" until Google. Google set the standard. Let's hope it doesn't grow too big for it's breeches.

    2. Re:Deja News by UltraAyla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same story for me. I was probably much younger and newer to the Internet at that time than many people here (I think my family got Internet access sometime in '97). I had heard a lot about Yahoo and AltaVista, so I tended to use them but I'd also looked around at MSN, Askjeeves, NothernLight and Lycos and all of those guys when I couldn't find what I was looking for. Then I started seeing Google coming up for things. I still remember thinking their site looked funny, but MAN did it find what I wanted so quickly. Sometime after that it became my home page (probably 2000 or 2001) and I more or less stopped using anything else.

  3. What a historic year 1998 was.... by Izabael_DaJinn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google AND the Big Lebowski make the scene in that fateful year. Coincidence? Hmm.....

    I don't know about Google, but the world is definitely a better place because of the Dude.

    --
    Careful What You Wish For....
  4. People use Google because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of all the search engines, Google was the best name to use as a verb.

    "All this time I thought 'Googling yourself' was the other thing."
    -- Marge Simpson

    1. Re:People use Google because... by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of all the search engines, Google was the best name to use as a verb.

      I disagree. Imagine the conversations if Microsoft's service had caught on:

      "Dude, have you seen Japanese tentacle rape?"
      "Yeah, I Lived it!"

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:People use Google because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot is tentacle rape insightful.

  5. When did I start using google? by stevedcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know, well before 2002. I'm sure they know the exact date!

    --
    todo - The developer's equivalent of confession: "Forgive me Father, for I have sinned..."
  6. Late 1999. by bluephone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In late 1999 I heard buzz from my fellow geeks that Google provided amazing results, so I tried it out. Within a couple days, I completely abandoned Alta Vista for Google, and even scaled back bothering with Yahoo because the results were just crazy accurate. I found myself boosting it to friends both of the geek persuasion and not, and everyone liked it. IMO, it was truly a case of a superior product trouncing the competition, the entire point of capitalism. They built a better mouse trap (pun not entirely intended).

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  7. It's easy to forget by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    how bad search really was before Google. For that matter it's easy to forget that it used to take work to find information at all. Our culture has just barely begun to come to terms with how revolutionary this change really is.

    --
    /...
    1. Re:It's easy to forget by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, it's easy to remember how bad search was before Google. Someone has set up a very handy page to remind everyone.

    2. Re:It's easy to forget by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's a second page?!

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  8. In related news... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google Beta Turns 15

  9. Stanford, the venture capital firm by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google started off running on Stanford equipment, and was spun off, as happens frequently at Stanford. Sun and Cisco also started with Stanford people and equipment.

    Stanford has become a real estate company and a venture capital firm that runs a university on the side for the tax break. It's working out very well; they now have $21.6 billion in investment assets, including a big chunk of Google. This started around 1991, when the financial management operation was spun off as a separate company. The financial operation invests in venture pools, which in turn fund venture capitalists, which fund startup companies, some of which become big. They can draw on expertise from the academic side to help evaluate investments. It's working quite well; annualized returns for the past decade were 15.1%. Tax free!

  10. Minimal Page Size by jbezorg · · Score: 4, Informative

    I started using Google as my home page because of it's minimal page size. If I opened a browser I was either going to use a bookmark or was going to do a search. Not having to wait for the overhead that the other search engines had was a bonus to search results that were on par with other search engines.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  11. Google doesn't want you to say Google by falconwolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually TFA says Google doesn't want people to use, say "googling" as a term for generic searches. As it says, there are serious, by business standards, concerns with using the term. It dilutes the trademark. Xerox had the same problem when people started using "xerox" to mean copying or duplicating. You only xerox on a Xerox machine. I skate with inline skates, the skates are Roller Blades, so when I use them I say roller blading. If the skate were not Roller Blades I wouldn't use the term "roller blading".

    Falcon

    1. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by spyder913 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately for Google (and Adobe, and Xerox) what they want people to do doesn't matter. Fortunately for the Google and Adobe, when people talk about "googling" or "photoshopping" they are still usually using their products. Unlike the large number of people making xeroxes on their Canon copier.

  12. do you Yahoo? by opencity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember Yahoo's big ad campaign to become a verb. No one Yahoos, everyone Googles

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  13. Re:Back in school.. by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    Same here.

    One day, when Yahoo was still king, I was having bad luck finding results. I had tried all the search engines I knew about.. Yahoo, Alta Vista, etc.

    Finally I asked Jeeves for the "best web search" and he recommended Google. Well done, Jeeves!

  14. "Don't be evil" by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with Google is that their "don't be evil" claim is hard to take seriously any more. Ads at the right of search results weren't too bad, but then it went downhill. They created the "content-related ad" industry, which resulted in a vast number of "made for AdWords" junk sites and blogs, the "domaining" industry, and a vast amount of crap. Even real advertisers don't like it; the smarter ones opt out of the Google Content Network and stick with the search result ads.

    From there it went downhill. Google doesn't do much to qualify their advertisers, and as we point out occasionally, about 35% of them are "bottom feeders", where you can't even identify the real business behind the ad.

    Then there's Google Checkout. They accept very marginal businesses. They ought to be doing the kind of validation a bank does of its clients, but clearly, they don't.

    Google's real problem is that they went public at the top of their game. Google was #1 in search when they went public, so they couldn't grow in their main business area. They had to expand to justify their high P/E ratio, and none of their expansion areas (YouTube, GMail, etc.) made money. So they had to figure out how to get more revenue per search result. At that point they started to turn to the dark side.