Slashdot Mirror
Dell To Sell Its Computer Factories
Anti-Globalism sends us to a Wall Street Journal for a report that Dell plans to sell its factories in an effort to revamp its production model. Quoting:
"Dell's plants are still regarded as efficient at churning out desktop PCs. But within the industry, company-owned factories aren't considered the least expensive way to produce laptops, which have been the main driver of growth lately and are complex and labor-intensive to assemble. Rivals such as Hewlett-Packard Co. years ago shifted to contract manufacturers -- companies that provide production services to others -- to build their portable computers. H-P builds "less than half" of its PCs in facilities it owns, wrote Tony Prophet, H-P's senior vice president for PC supply chain, in an e-mail. Contract manufacturers can generally produce computers more cheaply because their entire operations are narrowly focused on finding efficiencies in manufacturing, as opposed to large firms like Dell, which must also balance marketing and other considerations."
While it may be cheaper to outsource production of your primary product, quality control might not be as good.
Besides, it seems kinda wrong that a company that manufactures computers is outsourcing manufacturing of computers.
...Rivals such as Hewlett-Packard Co. years ago shifted to contract manufacturers -- companies that provide production services to others -- to build their portable computers. H-P builds "less than half" of its PCs in facilities it owns, wrote Tony Prophet, H-P's senior vice president for PC supply chain, in an e-mail...
To me, this is the crux of the matter. Dells indecision tells it all. I have had close interaction with folks at DELL and what strikes me, is their apparent indecision when it comes to matters that require immediate attention.
I cannot be convinced that with all the "spying" that goes on withing the PC and Notebook markets, DELL did not know that HP was outsourcing and saving a bunch. They knew but did nothing!
To make matters worse, HP produces better hardware as compared to DELL, in my opinion. So they must be doing something better than DELL.
Dells' factories were in the US, where they had to obey all sorts of US regulations that are expensive to obey; like OSHA rules, making it cost-ineffective to have US factories.
By having a contractor do it instead; Dell can avoid the negative political implications of having to say "they're sending their manufacturing overseas". Instead it will be a matter of a private contractor further outsourcing their work later, and Dell will be insulated from the necessary ramifications of their decision to minimize short-term immediate cost at the expense of control & being a good corporate citizen.
Which will give them some protection against legislation, human rights groups, etc, and various issues that normally occur when a company simply builds factories offshore and shuts down US factories.
Their contractors can have the laptops assembled cheaply offshore then shipped to the US.
Although the quality of the workmanship may diminish dramatically (and Dell laptops will be more prone to certain defects such as say perhaps HP laptops), the cost will be much less for them, when they can pay the labor-intensive laptop assemblers the equivalent of US $0.05 an hour instead of having to meet US federal minimum wage.
Cost savings are unlikely to be passed directly to consumers, so pure profit.
At least in the short term, rather clear why they would see it as a clear win.
I work for a print publishing firm, and we've been experiencing a recent surge in customers, because publishers are starting to focus on their core competency, which is content generation. The "other" business of printing, quality control, packaging, and distribution is now being out-sourced to other companies who specialize in squeezing the last dollar of efficiency out of this (manufacturing it cheaply, transporting it somewhere cheap to be processed, then ship it out everywhere else), and whose entire purpose in life is to efficiently produce, and distribute printed matter.
I'm sure Dell has complete control of the design of their hardware, where every nut and bolt goes. And the specifications will no doubt be very detailed, if my experience in the print industry's any indication.
It's just a matter of letting the organization that does something very well do it, rather than trying to do everything in-house.
They don't provide the services directly, they don't manufacture the hardware directly. They are now simply a middle man hoping to cream off some cash.
Can't think of a good reason to buy directly from them now.
Deleted
You honestly thought that by buying a Zune you would avoid cheap products and poor QA/QC? Just seven stories below this one on the main page is one about how the MS decided to ship a bunch of defective Xboxes just so they could get their console out before Sony's. Your post was informative and interesting, and then you go and spoil it all at the end by claiming that you've avoided this whole mess by buying a Zune.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
It is already happening with some things (at least it was a couple months ago). WSJ ran an article about it.
They said that for things like flowers for florists, that now typically get flown in from Chile, are right on the edge of being unfeasible because of the high cost of oil. Also, the US steel industry has gotten a boost since steel is so heavy.
For something like computers, or ipods, on the other hand, which have such a high value/weight ratio, it will be a long time before shipping is not cost effective.
Qxe4