Slashdot Mirror


Has Superstition Evolved To Help Mankind Survive?

Pickens writes "The tendency to falsely link cause to effect — a superstition — is occasionally beneficial, says Kevin Foster, an evolutionary biologist at Harvard University. For example, a prehistoric human might associate rustling grass with the approach of a predator and hide. Most of the time, the wind will have caused the sound, but 'if a group of lions is coming there's a huge benefit to not being around.' Foster worked with mathematical language and a simple definition for superstition to determine exactly when such potentially false connections pay off and found as long as the cost of believing a superstition is less than the cost of missing a real association, superstitious beliefs will be favored. In modern times, superstitions turn up as a belief in alternative and homeopathic remedies. 'The chances are that most of them don't do anything, but some of them do,' Foster says. Wolfgang Forstmeier argues that by linking cause and effect — often falsely — science is simply a dogmatic form of superstition. 'You have to find the trade off between being superstitious and being ignorant,' Forstmeier says. By ignoring building evidence that contradicts their long-held ideas, 'quite a lot of scientists tend to be ignorant quite often.'"

5 of 621 comments (clear)

  1. Homeopathy != alternative remedies by obeymydog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ignoring the painfully vague inclusion criteria for "alternative" treatments, it's just plain wrong to lump every non-pharmaceutical/medical treatment in with a sham like homeopathy. There's solid biochemical/clinical research to support a number of therapeutically active plant compounds and conservative treatment strategies that would probably be considered alternatives to conventional medical protocols. This sort of arrogant badmouthing keeps patients from getting decent information about their treatment options.

  2. Re:Placebo effect by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, well why does it require you to believe it? If the body can just magically fix itself, why have conscious thought involved?

    • Your body is pretty good at repairing itself. Your immune system will successfully eliminate vast majority of illnesses you encounter in your life. (most problems will go away on their own no matter if you do anything or not)
    • stress is known to have numerous harmful effects, including decreased resistance to disease.
    • If you give someone a pill they they believe will cure them, this reduces anxiety (stress) and lets the body be more efficient at healing.
  3. Re:Superstition can also cause great harm. by k33l0r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    look for a persuasive argument why Nancy and Ronald Reagan consulting fortune tellers and horoscopes might not be a good thing when Ron's got his finger on the nuclear button.

    Did Reagan launch any nukes during the 80's? No? Then your argument is completely flawed. In fact, since he didn't launch after consulting fortune tellers, it would appear that using fortune tellers actually helps prevent nuclear annihilation. Or maybe I'm just being superstitious in seeing that cause and effect.

    "Post hoc ergo propter hoc"

    You are committing a logical fallacy. By the same logic:
    Reagan ate breakfast each morning. Therefore breakfast prevents nuclear war.

  4. Re:Religion by GayBliss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Republicans in charge do get it, and get it very well. They know how easy it is to control people through religion, and it's one of the most powerful tools they have. They figured out that you can do pretty much anything you want in the name of God, and you will be supported by a lot of people because they can pretend to be following you in the path of God, whether they actually believe it or not. It comes back to the same question: Is it easier to just continue believing it, or to wake up and do something about it?

    The current administration is about as anti-Christian as anyone can get, but all Bush has to do is tell people what a great Christian he is, and they believe it, while he murders innocent people, takes from the poor and gives to the rich, and pins medals on people for NOT helping tragedy victims nearby that are dying from lack of a drink of clean water. What Would Jesus Do? indeed.

    Yet if you ask most people which party is more religious, most would say Republican. And one the arguments I hear a lot from Republicans about why the Democrats are so bad is that they spend too much money helping the poor.

    I'm not saying Democrats are much better. Just that the Republicans have the religious thing figured out.

  5. Re:Religion by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find that I'm in a weird place where I still have 'Christian' morals, but I don't believe in God.

    Funny, but I've often thought of the best Christians as having "humanist" morals. Perspective is a funny thing.

    Somersault, as someone who spent a big part of my life as an academic, I've seen more than one "spiritual awakening" of a very religious person who learns to set aside childish superstitions.

    It's not an easy road, but when you can start to see that your morals come from the person you are instead of the fear of punishment, you are truly "putting aside childish things" as a wise man said.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.