Slashdot Mirror


Hubble Finds Unidentified Object In Space

Gizmodo is reporting that the Hubble space telescope has found a new unidentified object in the middle of nowhere. Some are even suggesting that this could be a new class of object. Of course, without actually understanding more about it, the speculation seems a bit wild. "The object also appeared out of nowhere. It just wasn't there before. In fact, they don't even know where it is exactly located because it didn't behave like anything they know. Apparently, it can't be closer than 130 light-years but it can be as far as 11 billion light-years away. It's not in any known galaxy either. And they have ruled out a supernova too. It's something that they have never encountered before. In other words: they don't have a single clue about where or what the heck this thing is."

10 of 716 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Modding system by TheCycoONE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But there's nothing insightful, informative, or interesting to say. The summary covered that: "they don't have a single clue about where or what the heck this thing is."

  2. Re:Obligatory by Eudial · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Didn't you get the memo? A meme that is 20+ years old is an old meme. A tired meme. A meme that needs to rest in peace.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  3. Re:Modding system by Tipa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't get much funnier than getting your astronomy news from a gadget site.

  4. Re:Probably. by blincoln · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say it's a rock.

    A rock that appears suddenly and then disappears later? And is visible from light-years away? And has a spectral signature that doesn't match anything in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey? That's some rock.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  5. Re:Modding system by Jonny_eh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How insightful can a comment be when even the NASA astronomers don't know what it is? It's a post of ignorance, i.e. there's nothing more to be said unless someone has more data. The funny's just filling the void that would otherwise be filled with the chirping of crickets.

    In the absence of insight, funny wins out.

  6. Re:Race to theorize by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "will be discarded as foolish..." by the public.

    Yeah, could be. An excellent argument for better education leading to a smarter public, and better science journalism.

  7. Re:Well, Good by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The most exciting phrase in science, the one that heralds a new discovery, is rarely "Eureka!" and more often "That's funny. It's not supposed to do that..."."

  8. Re:Why is antimatter a mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can someone point me out what's wrong with this ultrasimple explanation?

    You mean other than the fact that antimatter does not travel backward through time?

  9. Re:That's no moon. It's a space station. by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course, that's all after-the-fact explanation by competent SF writers. Lucas just didn't know that "parsec" was a measure of distance at the time. And that's not the *real* Han Solo trilogy!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  10. Re:Modding system by joh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But there's nothing insightful, informative, or interesting to say. The summary covered that: "they don't have a single clue about where or what the heck this thing is."

    OK, here's something informative: Slashdot linked to a Gizmodo article, which made fun of a Sky and Telescope article, which reports about a scientific paper and then 95% of those commenting the Slashdot article never even read the Gizmodo article, 95% of those looking at the Gizmodo article never got as far as looking at the Sky and Telescope article and only about 3 Persons read the actual paper.