Slashdot Mirror


Copyright Board Lawyer Responds On Pandora's End

mattnyc99 writes "A month ago we talked about the impending death of streaming music site Pandora thanks to a very backwards fight over royalties. PopMech follows up with an article that, besides noting how insane it is that Pandora has to pay record labels for the bad songs that users skip, also gets the (three-member) Copyright Royalty Board to try and defend itself about why the government is determining royalty rates for the music industry. Quoting: 'It was uninvited,' says Richard Strasser, senior attorney for the Copyright Royalty Board. 'I don't think anybody was jumping up and down with joy in the government that they have this responsibility, but the former systems just weren't working out.'" No one seems to be trying to defend or explain why Internet radio is being hit so much harder than satellite or broadcast.

4 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Well, hell by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Funny
    mono e mono

    Unless you were referring to simulated stereo, you mean "mano a mano".

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  2. Re:Well, hell by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or it could mean 2.71828183 channel surround sound.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  3. Re:Well, hell by achenaar · · Score: 2, Funny

    lolgarithmic :)

  4. Re:Well, hell by p0gue · · Score: 2, Funny

    mono e mono

    Unless you were referring to simulated stereo, you mean "mano a mano".

    "Mono a mono" means "monkey to monkey". Fitting if you ask me, considering we're talking about government regulators and corporate attorneys.