Slashdot Mirror


Copyright Board Lawyer Responds On Pandora's End

mattnyc99 writes "A month ago we talked about the impending death of streaming music site Pandora thanks to a very backwards fight over royalties. PopMech follows up with an article that, besides noting how insane it is that Pandora has to pay record labels for the bad songs that users skip, also gets the (three-member) Copyright Royalty Board to try and defend itself about why the government is determining royalty rates for the music industry. Quoting: 'It was uninvited,' says Richard Strasser, senior attorney for the Copyright Royalty Board. 'I don't think anybody was jumping up and down with joy in the government that they have this responsibility, but the former systems just weren't working out.'" No one seems to be trying to defend or explain why Internet radio is being hit so much harder than satellite or broadcast.

8 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Pity by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have been listening to Pandora, discovering new artists, and had begun to buy music again (most of my music collection is CDs bought in the Eighties). Guess I'll just go back to listening to my 'oldies' - I can't be bothered to keep fighting the music industry to accept my money.

    1. Re:Pity by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have been listening to Pandora, discovering new artists, and had begun to buy music again

      Please consider checking RIAA Radar when buying music that you find through Pandora. When you pay for content published on RIAA labels, you are literally paying people to fight against your interests as a music fan.

      If people would simply stop rewarding stupidity, the RIAA would melt like the penny-dreadful movie villains they are.

  2. Re:Why internet radio is hit harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason is regular people can be broadcasters on the internet. This is not very appealing to large commercial cartels. They want to make royalties not just on the content but also the the broadcasting hardware. It ain't cheap or easy to start an XM radio or regular O-T-A radio station. The commercial interests want their cut â" so they seek to drive any one out of business who is doing internet radio.

  3. Re:Why internet radio is hit harder by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one seems to be trying to defend or explain why Internet radio is being hit so much harder than satellite or broadcast.

    That's an easy one. Cause people use the internet to steal copyrighted material.

    People can't "steal copyrighted material" from satellite and broadcast?

    I think I've got a better explanation. Broadcast and satellite are channels that require very high initial investment, thus locking out small competitors. Internet radio can be set up by anyone, and thus is harder for an industry cartel to control.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  4. Re:Why internet radio is hit harder by Chatterton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except the cost of such material, and the authorization to use some part of the radio spectrum? Hum, nothing.

  5. Re:The ISPs are hitting internet radio too by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    who the hell listens to internet radio for 8 hours every single day in a month?If you're considering listening while at the office, that's not bandwidth you should be concerned about so that's gone. The only people we have left using that kind of bandwidth are radio junkies who need some kind of noise playing all the time and who work from home/are unemployed. That's not a very big market, and to a person who needs to listen to that much radio, 30 GB out of 250GB per month (taking the recent Comcast announcement) isn't that much.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  6. Re:Why internet radio is hit harder by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They want to make royalties not just on the content but also the the broadcasting hardware

    What's to stop me from using my choice of broadcasting hardware if I was in the terrestrial radio business?

    In the USA, that would be the FCC, which operates its Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) "tasked with overseeing equipment authorization for all devices using the electromagnetic energy from 9 kHz to 300 GHz. OET maintains an electronic database of all Certified equipment which can be easily accessed by the public."

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  7. Re:Well, hell by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, payola is illegal. It's also standard operating procedure, and nobody gives a damn that it happens (or nobody in a position to do anything, at least).

    And let's face it - Pandora wouldn't be nearly as successful as it has been if it could only play indie music. Say what you want about quality, but there's a tremendously larger audience for mainstream music, pretty much by definition (now technically mainstream and indie aren't mutually exclusive, but it tends to work out that way more often than not).

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?