Slashdot Mirror


Royal Society "Creationist" Resigns

Chris_Keene writes in to let us know that the Prof. Michael Reiss, who recently caused a storm with comments about teaching creationism in schools, has resigned from his post as director of education at the Royal Society in the UK. This news coincides with word out of the Anglican church that it is ready to apologize to Charles Darwin, 150 years after it poured scorn on his theory of evolution by natural selection. "The Church of England will concede in a statement that it was over-defensive and over-emotional in dismissing Darwin's ideas. It will call 'anti-evolutionary fervor' an 'indictment' on the Church."

33 of 658 comments (clear)

  1. First Intelligently Designed Trout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I AM A FISH!

    1. Re:First Intelligently Designed Trout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      wehat dio yoiui meaan fgins domnt woerk, yiou inswensatiove clode!

    2. Re:First Intelligently Designed Trout! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Funny

      I AM A FISH!

      I am the walrus.

      That means you are dinner.

      (And before some smart-ass tells me that walruses prefer mollusks, yeah, I know. Now stop trying to ruin my joke.)

      (And before some smart-ass tells me that I did that all on my own, yeah, I know. Now stop trying to ruin my meta-joke.)

    3. Re:First Intelligently Designed Trout! by Alsn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to point out that you ruined your meta-meta-joke.

    4. Re:First Intelligently Designed Trout! by glittalogik · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does 'meta-joke' refer more accurately to a joke about jokes, as in your example, or a joke that generates other joke, like the Irish knock-knock joke (hint: you start), or one that sort of does both?

      "Three blokes go into a pub. One of them is a little bit stupid, and the whole scene unfolds with a tedious inevitability."
      -- Bill Bailey

    5. Re:First Intelligently Designed Trout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am the walrus.

      An Royel Sosietty can evolve me new bukkit.

    6. Re:First Intelligently Designed Trout! by Yewbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favorite of that ilk:

      A priest, a clown and a six-foot tall talking rabbit walk into a bar. The bartender goes, "What is this, some kind of a joke?"

  2. That was an intelligently designed decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, no, it was survival by the fittest.

    1. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Creationists Evolved, Evolutionists were created....

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... that evolved basically from a molecule and so forth and so forth.

      It's molecules all the way down. Sheesh.

    3. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why wait? Attend a church today!

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    4. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually science still can't explain where DNA came from or for that matter science cannot explain matter.

      Which is why I personally don't believe in matter.

      I would love if Evolutionists would reconsider their views but for them it is the Holy Grail and a religion

      Damn scientists and their unwavering, dogmatic belief in whichever theory is best supported by the evidence!

      I don't dispute evolution as in "Survival of the fittest" and change over time and adaptations. I reject it as an explanation for the source of all matter, dna, and life. It doesn't tackle those subjects yet you always see those lumped into evolutionary discussions.

      You stand brave against that strawman! I also reject evolution as an explanation for continental drift, tornados, and the northern lights. Take THAT, scientific dogma!

    5. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by againjj · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's punishment for the sins of the parents or, if you believe in reincarnation, the sins of the person being reborn.

    6. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact, everything we know about the world is wrong where it contradicts my opinions.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    7. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Macgrrl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was it the first mention of rain? Rain requires clouds to form.

      I'm going to regret wading into to this I suspect.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    8. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If a memetic equivalent of an asteroid strikes (say, a sequence of DNA from a 200-year-old Galapagos Tortoise, that, when translated from base-4 to base-2 and divided into 8-bit bytes, produces ASCII for "This being copyright God, Inc., 4004 BC, and limited license is hereby given to this being to go forth and multiply", and said sequence is discovered before the invention of self-propagating genetically-engineered Galapagos-Tortoise-specific retroviruses), we evolutionists will be happy to reconsider our views.

      Dude - I am so going to synthesize that retrovirus now! Heck, I might as well insert my own name and take all the credit...

    9. Re:That was an intelligently designed decision by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you don't vote for either the democrats or republicans you are throwing your vote away!

  3. A terrible shame by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Funny

    The contemporary militant Tooth Fairy jihadist movement continues to be disrespected by these scientific infidels.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  4. Burying Ms Hatchet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "This news coincides with word out of the Anglican church that it is ready to apologize to Charles Darwin, 150 years after it poured scorn on his theory of evolution by natural selection. "The Church of England will concede in a statement that it was over-defensive and over-emotional in dismissing Darwin's ideas. It will call 'anti-evolutionary fervor' an 'indictment' on the Church.""

    Now will the evolutionist and the creationists kiss and make up?

  5. Re:Evolution by nattt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gravity is just a theory, not a proven fact, but I still fall over...

    --
    -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  6. Re:Intellectuals are so right... by Curtman · · Score: 3, Funny

    You just described an evolutionist's understanding of DNA.

    I guess I must have missed the part on telepathy and omniscience.

  7. Re:Evolution by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Alcohol is just a theory, not a proven fact, but I still fall over...

    --
    Anonymous Coward
  8. God spoke English in 4004 BC? by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, cool. So the KJV is the original word of God.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:God spoke English in 4004 BC? by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Funny

      English is his preferred language. He could speak Hebrew, but he always had a thick accent.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    2. Re:God spoke English in 4004 BC? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the KJV is the original word of God.

      My neighbor Yoshi disagrees, as does my neighbor Ramanathan and my neighbor Ali. I'd ask my neighbor Steve, but he's an Evangelical, and at the moment he and his wife are getting their nightly word of God from Fox News.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. Re:please, please ... by uberjack · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please Please yourself.

    No - please please me - whoa yeah!

  10. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gosh. It's been a long time. I'm pretty sure I could divide an angle into an number of divisions using my compass and a straight edge. The trick is that you have to be an engineer instead of a mathematician. It reminds me of a joke...

    An engineer and a mathematician are standing some distance away from Natalie Portman who is holding a pot of steaming hot grits. They are told that they can only approach Natalie by covering one half the distance with each iteration. They can use as many iterations as they want to approach Natalie. The mathemetician leaves in disgust. The engineer says, "I can get close enough for practical purposes."

  11. Re:The good doctor was a vicar instead by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    It'd be like finding out a Linux admin runs Windows at home. He'd be ridiculed until he had to step down with a tarnished reputation and may not ever be able to work in computers again.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  12. Re:please, please ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pressuring someone to resign because they mention the word "creationism"...

    Mentioning "creationism" when your in the Royal Academy of Science is not unlike mentioning "blowjob" at a meeting of the Evangelical Women's Association. It's a little more than a "slip of the tongue", and you might get asked to leave.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. Re:please, please ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing in this world is more annoying than an American atheist

    Clearly, you've never met a Missouri fundamentalist.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:What a waste. -- Mod up by superyooser · · Score: 1, Funny

    For non-UK readers - the Daily Mail is a conservative right wing tabloid.

    That's a contradiction in terms. Tabloids are anathema to social conservatives.

    it is very pro-Christian, and anti-atheism

    I have read scores of stories in the Daily Mail over the years (linked from Drudge), and I'm stunned at your opinion. Pro-Christian? On its site right now, there are no fewer than half a dozen headlined stories focusing on the "pro-Christian" topic of boobs--one of them on male boobs. It's like that every day. The site is almost pornographic. I try to ignore the naughty links on the side, and as a follower of the Bible personally, I'm a little ashamed to admit that I read stories there. The site, over all, definitely promotes an atheistic/humanistic philosophy over a Christian one. If the Daily Mail is what passes for "pro-Christian" in the UK media, the rest must have gone to hell, literally. I know it's not really that bad, but you calling the Daily Mail conservative is like Palestinians calling Bill Clinton a Zionist.

  15. "Creationist" Resigns by Mr.+Lwanga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank God.

  16. Re:matter is just a residue by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

    All possible stuff and their opposite.

    So somewhere out there is a man called Bush W George, an intelligent and respected man, who is opposed to war and cares deeply about the environment.

    Of course with all things being opposite Bush W George lost the election to the warmongering, environment destroying imbecile Gore Al, so the anti-matter universe is not really all that different too our own in the end.