Slashdot Mirror


Citizens Demand To See Secret ACTA Treaty

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "One hundred groups of concerned citizens have united to demand a look at the secret ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) treaty and have drafted a letter to their representatives asking for information. We've discussed ACTA before, including what are believed to be parts of ACTA that lawmakers are trying to get a head start on."

10 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Brave New World, 1984 by hpycmprok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Brave New World, 1984, Fahrenheit 451, Animal Farm, etc...

    When I was in school (a while ago) these were books we had to read.

    Seems most people 10, 15, or more years younger than myself haven't even heard of these stories.

    Corporations are taking over the world. A well functioning democracy requires an educated populace.

    Considering what public schools are turning out here in the US, so much of what happens in the world isn't surprising to me anymore.

    I don't know what is more disturbing, the fact that so many people don't seem bothered by things like TFA, or that people aren't aware of them and/or don't understand them.

    1. Re:Brave New World, 1984 by garett_spencley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What bothers me the most, and what I don't think most people understand / are aware of, is how international treaties can be signed, thus becoming laws which supersede the most supreme law of the country (constitution, charter, bill of rights etc.) all without public knowledge or involvement.

      I think every single democratic country desperately needs to update their charters with clauses requiring that all international agreements be signed with public knowledge, consent and involvement and to clearly make available avenues for referendums so that the public can force their governments to withdraw if the majority of the population wishes (without replacing their government obviously).

    2. Re:Brave New World, 1984 by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem ultimately is that people in the West have become incredibly coddled. It's not that they trust governments more than they did in the past, it's just that they can't get out of their web browser, off the telephone to Aunt Mavis or turn off the TV long enough to give a shit about the nature of liberty and the need of vigilance. People may not always be happy to surrender personal responsibility to their governments, but they're too fucking lazy to realize that it's not themselves they're selling down the river, but rather their children and grandchildren, who will suffer the consequences much more severely than us.

      Governments always have and always will tend towards tyranny. It is the nature of the species that we organize ourselves into dominance hierarchies, and that very fundamental encoded behavior is a powerful force. The Founding Fathers, along with many great minds of the Enlightenment, hoped to create societies and complimentary political systems that could overcome to some degree human nature, to create societies that could strive for freedom, justice and equality, where the least in society could at least dare to hope that they might be able to enjoy the liberties of the greatest.

      But, sadly, America, like most of the West, is turning its back on the Enlightenment. We are rapidly becoming a civilization that will sell itself away bit by bit, giving away every hard-earned freedom for the promise of security (which, as even the most tyrannical regimes in history demonstrate, can never really be bought). So many believe the lies of the corporate-government oligarchies, not because the lies are believable, but because believing the lies is so much easier than the alternative, which involves using democracy to punish the liars.

      And now look. Wall Street is melting down, and the liars are begging for aid from the catastrophe they caused. Where are the citizens, commanding their political servants, flexing their muscle, making the mighty tremble in their cracking ivory towers? No, much easier to let our betters do what's right, even though letting our betters do what's right has thus far lead to one of the most severe (if not the most severe) financial crises since 1929.

      But that's alright, because a new television season is here, and the Feds will throw lots of money around, and it's Tuesday and I'm tired after picking the kids up from soccer practice, and I've got to get to work early tomorrow, and what can one vote do, and voting for a third party is throwing my vote way, and... and... and... and...

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Brave New World, 1984 by NovaHorizon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hmm.. Seems you and the parent here (as most people are) are unaware that the United States is not and never was a democracy.

      I demonstrate my point 1 one very simple exercise. Say the Pledge of Allegiance.

      I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

      On top of that, democracies are bad.

      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!"
      - Benjamin Franklin

      Also, nothing the government does can supersede the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is not a declaration of what the people are allowed. It is a list to remind the government of what they cannot prevent. We made the Government, and gave it privileges. It can NOT infringe on the rights we have for being sovereign individuals. In fact...

      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
      -- Thomas Jefferson

      ...

      /rant

    4. Re:Brave New World, 1984 by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you say "Corporations are taking over the world", are you generalizing a bit, or do you really hate Capitalism

      I'm not the OP, but hating what Capitalism has wrought is not the same as hating Capitalism, just as hating your wife's lasagna is not the same as hating your wife.

      Corporations, and Capitalism, have a very critical role in our world, but ruling the world is not their role. Corporations exist primarily (some would say solely, but I think that's too simplistic) to serve the interests of their shareholders, or owners. If Corporations were to rule the world, essentially, we would be taking the rulership away from The People, where it belongs, and giving it to the wealthy few.

      So, for me, I don't hate Capitalism, but I do most definitely hate many of the things Capitalists have done.

      The world is not so black-and-white.

  2. Re:ACTA?! by deepershade · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I like to know what my government is doing behind my back Screwing you.

  3. Re:Occam's razor? by spikedvodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    yes, but it's much easier to arrange a "civil protest" about an action when you know what's going on BEFORE they vote on it.

    not to push buttons here, but if there had been enough time prior to the patriot act being voted on, do you think people would have gotten into an uproar?

    for this whole democracy thing to work right, we need to have an edumacated populace, we need to know what's going on in enough time to tell our congress-critters how we feel they should represent us.

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  4. Shouldn't even be a question. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that this is even an issue suggests that things are thoroughly rotten. There are arguably justified instances of government secrecy(aspects of national defence, any private data that has to be handled during course of business, certain subsets of police activity); but there is absolutely no plausible claim that ACTA falls under such a heading.

    Unfortunately, even figuring out who is responsible is a rather murky business. This is the one thing that really bothers me about a lot of international/multinational activities and organizations. Democracy is tenuous enough with the layers of alleged representation within a nation, once you lay a mass of appointed diplomats on top of that, you get something largely opaque and unresponsive. That might be ok if your job is agreeing that starving orphans are tragic; but if you work will end up as law across the developed world, you need to do better than that.(well, actually you don't, and we just have to suck it up; but I meant that in the normative sense)

  5. You'll never get your money back by AnotherUsername · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, they stole your money and used it to build roads, build hospitals, maintain and strengthen a military, provide protection from criminals, educate the young, stop threats against the country, and help out those who have run into misfortune. Yes, they stole your money and you will never get it back in any form.

    --
    I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    1. Re:You'll never get your money back by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Yes, they stole your money and used it to build roads, build hospitals, maintain and strengthen a military, provide protection from criminals, educate the young, stop threats against the country..."

      If only they would stop at those actions!! Yes, those indeed are what a govt. are for for the most part, yet they seem hell bent on overstepping those powers, in order to restrict the rights and privacy of the citizens from whom their power (supposedly) comes from. They seem to be more interested in locking down society, and protecting corporate issues and interests.

      THAT is what we're all wary of and protesting....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........