Slashdot Mirror


To Purge Or Not To Purge Your Data

Lucas123 writes "The average company pays from $1 million to $3 million per terabyte of data during legal e-discovery. The average employee generates 10GB of data per year at a cost of $5 per gigabyte to back it up — so a 5,000-worker company will pay out $1.25 million for five years of storage. So while you need to pay attention to retaining data for business and legal requirements, experts say you also need to be keeping less, according to a story on Computerworld. The problem is, most organizations hang on to more data than they need, for much longer than they should. 'Many people would prefer to throw technology at the problem than address it at a business level by making changes in policies and processes.'"

3 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Purging is bad. by PsyberS · · Score: 1, Funny

    Data bulimia is a serious problem. If you know someone effected, make sure to get them the help they need asap.

  2. easy solution by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    put everything on one disk drive, unRAIDed. when it fails, problem solved. voila, built in obsolescence

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  3. Re:10 GB user data? Not likely by value_added · · Score: 2, Funny

    If assuming 300 work days per employee, that would mean that the average employee creates 1.2 kB of data per second.

    Top posting and absence of editing by Microsoft Outlook users engaged in a brief inter-departmental discussion could easily account for that volume.

    Is that what you meant by "isn't user generated"?