Slashdot Mirror


Canonical Offers Sale of Proprietary Codecs for Ubuntu

ruphus13 writes "Playing DVDs on Linux that required proprietary codecs has been a source of much pain. Ubuntu (or anyone else, for that matter) is not legally allowed to redistribute these codecs. So, users were left with sub-optimal choices. Convert the multimedia to an open format, acquire new media, or use a codec 'found' on the web, which may be illegal. In its continued effort to have a seamless and slick user experience, Canonical made the hard choice to offer the sale and support for proprietary codecs that users had to actually purchase for Ubuntu. This is not a fight Canonical can fight alone, and they are sure to get some grief for the decision."

16 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Somebody had to do it... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Informative

    My only question is, how much will it cost?

    Streaming media and web stuff: USD$40. DVD playback: USD$50.00.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  2. Re:Finally! by clang_jangle · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't think so, but Kubuntu definitely does. They really should either make the kde net admin utility the standard for Ubuntu or upgrade the gnome version to be zero-conf as well.

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  3. Re:Canonical == Microsoft by snl2587 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know you're just trolling, but for those who actually feel this way, look at it like this:

    Canonical knows that a large proportion of Ubuntu users download and use the "illegal" codecs without paying the license fees (either directly, where it applies, or indirectly by using the programs that the codec can be legally used for). Canonical does not own these codecs and cannot legally provide or create free alternatives due to all of the craziness surrounding patent law. So they offer an option for their legally-conscious users and business users: fully-supported, license-fee-paid codecs that will not put their users in legal jeopardy.

    Please tell me what the evil in this is.

  4. Re:Good on 'em! by stubear · · Score: 3, Informative

    "While I think it shameful that the DVD producers have decided that I need to pay extra to run a DVD that I already own,..."

    No, they have not decided this. They charge a license for codecs to DVD player manufacturers as well but those are built in to the devices out of the box so the costs are already part of the price set by the manufacturer. With computers, you do not purchase the ability to use your system as a DVD player simply y purchasing hardware, you purchase the codecs, and subsequently, through the OS or similar solution such as the one offered by Ubuntu.

  5. uh huh by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Informative

    'Cos, y'know, it's not like you can just install VLC from Synaptic.

    (VLC is also my favourite media and DVD player on Mac.)

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:uh huh by GFree678 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The version of VLC that is available in the official Ubuntu repositories does NOT have the necessary codec to go along with it, for legal reasons. To enable support for encrypted DVDs (i.e. the ones people want to watch), you need to install libdvdcss2 from something like Medibuntu, which is the whole issue due to its questionable legality. The alternative is to download and compile VLC themselves from the main Videolan site, but that takes even more work.

  6. Re:Somebody had to do it... by vwjeff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft does not support DVD playback for free but most PCs sold with DVD drives have playback software installed by the OEM.

  7. Re:Finally! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ubuntu + Amarok = iPod perfection, imo.

  8. Re:Finally! by schwinn8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    WICD works wonderfully for me, with zero issues...? http://wicd.sourceforge.net/

  9. Re:Finally! by kwark · · Score: 4, Informative

    You should look into wpa_supplicant, on Debian/Unstable (so I guess ubuntu should have this also) it couldn't get any easier: /etc/network/interfaces:
    allow-hotplug wlan0
    iface wlan0 inet manual
      wpa-roam /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf

    iface home inet static
      address 10.0.1.67
      netmask 255.255.255.0
      gateway 10.0.1.254

    iface elsewhere inet dhcp /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf:

    network={
      ssid="myhomessid"
      id_str="home"
      scan_ssid=1
      key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
      psk="areallytopsecretpassphrase"
    }

    network={
      ssid="FON_AP"
      id_str="elsewhere"
      scan_ssid=1
      key_mgmt=NONE
    }

    But you are using WEP at home? I hope you know what you are doing.

  10. Re:Finally! by Teun · · Score: 5, Informative
    The best network manager around is wicd.

    For many it's the only way to get a reliable WPA connection.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  11. Re:Finally! by cyphercell · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/

    intel wireless chipsets are NICE. I bought a dell laptop with ubuntu pre-installed that came with an intel wireless chipset, I have no problems whatsoever.

    the big thing for ubuntu would be to pressure other hardware makers to go the same route as intel, guess it hasn't been working out. as a customer I prefer to support intel and other hardware manufacturers that provide support for Foss drivers.

    --
    Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  12. Re:Finally! by nawcom · · Score: 3, Informative

    I should also say that its not just for wpa_supplicant; it is also used as a general dhcp client gui, so lan cards are managed also.

  13. Re:Finally! by CaptPungent · · Score: 3, Informative

    Eh? This is all I have to do with my Ubuntu workstation...Just click for the dropdown, select the network (WPA encrypted) and put in the password, after that it saves the PW and I have never had to put it back in....I never realized it was a problem, it "Just Worked" for me.

    --
    C Pungent
  14. Re:Finally! by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 3, Informative

    intel wireless chipsets are NICE.

    No they aren't. My laptop came with an ipw2100. If in the presence of more than a few APs the card will hang and the driver will restart it, hanging everything for a second or two. This is a bug that has been known about for years and still isn't fixed. I gave up waiting for them a while ago and replaced the piece of crap with an Atheros card. No more hangs.

  15. Re:patented, not propritary by benwaggoner · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. I'm sure they're making a pretty penny here. The highest single codec license fee I know if is MPEG-2, which was $2.50 last I checked. VC-1 and H.264 are less than a dollar each.

    Lots more about codec licensing than you'd ever care to learn can be found at http://www.mpegla.com/.