Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Cisco To Buy Jabber

Posted by Soulskill on from the swallowed-whole dept.

Danny Rathjens writes "In the continuing trend of big companies buying out small companies with open source products, Cisco has announced that they are buying Jabber. The press release doesn't really talk about the open source aspect of Jabber, and Jabber's website doesn't mention the news yet. I'm sure the question many of us have is whether Jabber's open source status will be changed in any way due to the purchase." Reader Eddytorial had this to contribute: "eWEEK offers a good look into how Jabber's messaging client will fit into Cisco Systems' overall 'presence' strategy in its market wars with Avaya, Microsoft, Nortel, and others. Cisco, which already had a basic instant messaging option, but one that didn't scale for an enterprise nearly as well as Jabber's, has just about everything else in place." It's also worth noting that Cisco open-sourced Etch in recent months.

5 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Jabber Inc by ensignyu · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's important to note that Cisco is only buying Jabber Inc. XMPP is an open standard, so anyone can implement their own client or server, and lots of people have. That's not going to change, regardless of what Cisco does.

    Furthermore, Jabber Inc's XCP server isn't even open source. I suspect that other Jabber servers such as the open source jabberd and ejabberd are much more commonly used in the open source community.

    So Cisco's acquisition of Jabber Inc really has no impact on the Jabber/XMPP open source community. In fact, continuing to develop Jabber XCP as a commercial product can only help push the adoption of XMPP, which is good for everyone.

  2. Re:Or.... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Doesn't much matter whether they try or not. I don't know of any even remotely common OSS licences that can be retroactively rescinded. They can certainly stop releasing under an OSS licence, and they could, if they felt like it, pull all the mirrors they control quite suddenly; but if somebody else has a copy that has been released under an OSS licence, they can't do much of anything about it.

  3. Re:Or.... by Randle_Revar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, Jabber Inc owns Jabber XCP, which is closed already.

    Jabberd 1.4 and Jabberd2 are not owned, controlled or even affiliated with Jabber Inc. Openfire and ejabberd are likewise not connected to Jabber Inc. Furthermore, all are FOSS and the license cannot be revoked.

    As for XMPP itself, it is managed by the independent, non-profit XMPP Standards Foundation, and the core of XMPP also exists as several Standards Track IETF RFCs.

    --
    Climate Progress - Hell and High Water
  4. Re:Cisco by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Informative

    >unless they intend to end the open source licensing.
    Jabber XCP is not OSS

    --
    Climate Progress - Hell and High Water
  5. Re:When in doubt, fork off. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 3, Informative

    How does stuff like this get post and modded insightful, when there are already numerous post stating that:

    1. the protocol is open
    2. OSS licenses can't be retroactively revoked
    3. The Jabber Inc product, Jabber XCP, is not and never has been Open Source.
    4. There are 3 or 4 major OSS xmpp servers already, and several smaller ones (and none of these have been bought).

    --
    Climate Progress - Hell and High Water