Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Innovates Tent Data Centers

1sockchuck writes "The outside-the-box thinking in data center design continues. Microsoft has tested running a rack of servers in a tent outside one of its data centers. In seven months of testing, a small group of servers ran for seven months without failures, even when water dripped on the rack. The experiment builds on Intel's recent research on air-side economizers in suggesting that servers may be sturdier than believed, leaving more room to save energy by optimizing cooling set points and other key environmental settings in the server room."

16 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Or otherwised titled by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft Pitches a Tent.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Or otherwised titled by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only if they did it in-tentionally. But sometimes you run into people who are just that kinda guy, and they're forever trying to canvas people. But it's ok, it's pretty easy to get them pegged.

    2. Re:Or otherwised titled by CodeBuster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clippy: It looks like you are trying to pitch a tent. Would you like some help with that?

    3. Re:Or otherwised titled by Cyberia · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh! Look at the cool clowns!

      Oh... wait, those are Windows Administrators... my bad.

    4. Re:Or otherwised titled by veganboyjosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think there's a lot more at stake here than people realize.

  2. Sensible? by Azaril · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure it'll work fine untill someone strolls past, lifts up the canvas and walks off with the entire rack. Or accidently flicks a cigarrette but at the tent. Or....

    1. Re:Sensible? by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you even considered the possibility of sentient tomatoes? I mean, how reckless can you be? Didn't we learn ANYTHING from the movie "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes"

      Kids these days...so reckless......

  3. uptime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow 7 months uptime... was it running Linux?

    1. Re:uptime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The tent, not the server.

  4. Outside security. by UberHoser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PHB: Well we just put up all of our servers outside. And it looks great! Say, what is that truck doing? Why is it driving so fast through all the security points... omg !

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
    1. Re:Outside security. by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld coming to upgrade your servers to Vista. OMG! Run!

  5. Clarity by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I said there would never be any Microsoft servers running in my department, I don't think they quite got my meaning.

  6. Great idea by Tx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Datacenter break-ins are becoming more and more commonplace, and it costs so much to replace the reinforced doors etc that the thieves bust up on their way in. Now with this innovation, they can just walk in and take the servers without doing any infrastructure damage. I think I'll pitch (groan) this idea to the boss right now!

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  7. microsoft innovates? yeah right. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how the military and the Live concert people have been doing this for years, but microsoft innovated putting servers in a tent.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  8. Outdoor job by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh my, who's that burly, rugged, well-tanned guy with the rolled-up shirtsleeves?

    Him? Oh he's our server admin

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  9. Re:Software vs Hardware Engineers by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, what do the hardware engineers know who designed and tested the servers?

    They know what the servers will survive, not what it could survive.

    When designing a machine to work from 10C to 50C and from 20% to 70% humidity, they don't deliberately design it to fail just outside that range. They just make damned sure it won't fail within those ranges (at least, not because of temperature or humidity).


    Microsoft's software engineers can show them what the servers are really capable of, without even testing them out for all four seasons. /sarcasm

    Sarcasm ignored, yes, Microsoft (or any of us willing to sacrifice a server for the cause) can indeed demonstrate that a server can live in a more harsh environment than intended. Because, as mentioned above, the hardware engineers didn't design the systems to fail just outside their spec'd range.

    We (as a whole) tend to baby servers because they cost a lot... But the cost of maintaining a perfect environment for them far outweighs the price for the actual hardware; If you can chop that expense out of the budget for the 99% of your servers that don't strictly require five-9s uptime, the savings in TCO could potentially far outweigh the increased cost of more frequent hardware replacement.