Slashdot Mirror


Unemployment Hits New High In Silicon Valley

Though there may be some degree of cushion for IT workers in the US generally, Slatterz writes "The steadily climbing unemployment rate in Silicon Valley has reached a shocking four-year high of 6.6 per cent. Recent statistics indicate that the percentage of unemployed workers in the sunny state of California has increased to 7.7 in August — up from 7.4 per cent in July. Jeffrey Lindsay of Bernstein Research explained that a number of Internet firms were chronically overstaffed."

7 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Australia sucks too by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Employers are being very picky - they demand an exact skills match. They demand you are already familiar with the exact software package you are using. They're no longer willing to retrain even for permanent roles, or even let you read the manual. It's getting specialized, and IMHO the specialization has got ridiculous. It's no longer enough to be a C++ Programmer for example, if they're hiring a C++ Programmer for Embedded Systems. They can afford to be that fussy. A lot of tech that was popular a few years ago has died out. Don't waste time applying for jobs unless your resume is a perfect match. Instead think about taking some time off to retrain. Java is still in demand for example. Or start your own company. Or switch to something else. IT is fun, I guess, but if you want to make money there are much more lucrative businesses.

    1. Re:Australia sucks too by Shados · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember in 2006 an ad for a senior .NET developer job... The catch is, that ad was obviously written by HR, not IT...so they used their canned senior developer ad...

      Senior developer often means 6-8 years experience. So they asked for someone with 6-8 years experience with the .NET framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005.

      Think about it for a sec. in 2006, 6-8 years experience with VS2005... whoops much? .NET in general came out in 2002, so even if someone used the beta 1-2 years before general release, worked at Microsoft or something, you could at best brush the requirement at 6 year... 8 year was plain and simple impossible.

      Funny stuff.

  2. Re:Move to Chicago by BVis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's no shortage of IT workers. There's a shortage of IT workers able/willing to work for the salaries/benefits companies are offering.

    I wonder how many workers in the Valley are unemployed because of the incompetence of said recruiters? I think it's quite possible that there's jobs out there that are a match with an unemployed worker, but the recruiters (who you have to deal with if you want a job) are too stupid/ignorant/incompetent/lazy to do their jobs properly.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  3. Re:IT Workers Cushioned From US Economic Downturn by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This article doesn't say that SV IT workers are experiencing high unemployment. It says that the region has high unemployment.

    Hopefully, the mortgage hustlers are the ones out of jobs, instead of the people who actually do productive work.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  4. Check out the U6 by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now at 10.7 pct for August. Counts part-timers looking for full-time work, the discouraged etc. at 10.7 for the US.

    I couldn't find numbers for silly valley, but my gut feeling is that it is above the national average there.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  5. Re:One question by jacquesm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know quite a few people that have moved back from the US and actually run pretty impressive IT outfits.

    They all got their education states side and they moved back as soon as their finances allowed them to.

    They live a pretty good life in India and I don't think there is any amount of money that would entice them to go back.

  6. Re:Recession vs depression by John+Jamieson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You said.
    "Everything will shake out as it ALWAYS has - even right after the Great Depression, which gets more and more overrated as the years go by"

    I would argue the opposite. We seem to minimize the great depression.
    1. In all the charts for stock market performance, I NEVER see one that goes back to 1929. Hmmm
    2. If you are talking about corrections, you cannot say "everything will shake out... even right after the great depression".
    First, the correction was the 1929 stock market crash. Second, everything did not shake out, there were people who lived with hunger and poverty for 10+ years.
    Third, many people lost everything. My grandfather lost about $250,000 when the financial institutions collapsed. He never recovered a cent.
    Forth, it may have taken another decade to overcome if it hadn't been for the horrible war.

    You KNOW the great depression was a CATASTROPHIC event. How can you tell? Look at the effect it had on the people who lived through it. They still waste NOTHING, and have a hard time throwing things out. Anything that has that effect on people 70 years later is serious.