Slashdot Mirror


Is There a Linux Client Solution for Exchange 2007?

CrazedSanity writes "I have been working at my state job for about 7 months now, using the Exchange plugin for Evolution to check my email. Very recently the higher-ups decided to migrate to Exchange 2007, which effectively destroyed my ability to check my email through any method other than webmail (which means I have to constantly refresh/reload the webmail window). I'm sure somebody else has encountered the problem, but I'm wondering if anybody has come up with a working solution?" Note: CrazedSanity's looking for a client that will work with Exchange in a situation where replacing the Exchange install with an open-source equivalent isn't an option.

24 of 385 comments (clear)

  1. Quick and dirty by cixelsyd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Virtualize a Windows box with Outlook.

    --
    Take a dollar, divide it by 100, take two and call me in the morning.
    1. Re:Quick and dirty by Etrias · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not a great solution. Yeah you could do this, but then you have to get the VM up and running (VirtualBox is good for this), make sure you have some sort of Windows license, install Outlook (again, with a license that works), join the VM to the domain (if you want seamless access) and set up your profile. Hey, now that's done, every day when you boot up, you boot up your VM, log in (if you joined it to the domain), fire up Outlook and watch as your VM chews up a good chunk of your processing power running a VM to run one app.

      There's not a silver bullet here unfortunately. A VM, while handy and possible, isn't an elegant solution and it sounds like he's been working off of Evolution, so we're pretty much looking at just getting mail running. Easiest way: ask the local techs to make sure IMAP is running and install Thunderbird. Like I said, not ideal, but that's when you get when Microsoft decides not to play nicely with others.

    2. Re:Quick and dirty by Intron · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555851

      If Office 2003 worked, then Evolution would work.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    3. Re:Quick and dirty by c_g_hills · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try and get your hands on a copy of TinyXP Rev05. It is the smallest XP re-spin I have found. It uses no more than 45MB RAM after boot-up, leaving plenty of space for your applications.

    4. Re:Quick and dirty by darkpixel2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555851

      If Office 2003 worked, then Evolution would work.

      Nice KB Microsoft: "The eliminate of the creation of Public Folder store and the connection from this Public Folder store to the mailbox store."

      Apparently working with Exchange 2007 also causes brain damage...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  2. Duh by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just telnet in and use SMTP commands.

    1. Re:Duh by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd imagine most folk that have administered a mail server have sent mail with telnet. It's not difficult and if your new server is doing something weird it can be very useful for diagnosis.

      You just do something like:


      telnet mail.example.com 25
      EHLO me.example.com
      MAIL FROM: <me@me.example.com>
      RCPT TO: <you@mail.example.com>
      DATA
      Subject: Message sent with telnet

      Here's my message body.
      .

    2. Re:Duh by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Informative?

      A guy suggesting, seriously as far as I can work out, that you can replace Outlook with TELNET! is marked "informative?"

    3. Re:Duh by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Informative

      # man uuencode
      uuencode(1)
      NAME
                    uuencode, uudecode - encode a binary file, or decode its representation
      SYNOPSIS
                    uuencode [-m] [ file ] name

                    uudecode [-o outfile] [ file ]...

      DESCRIPTION
                    Uuencode and uudecode are used to transmit binary files over transmission mediums that do not support other than
                    simple ASCII data. ...

    4. Re:Duh by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you mean to tell me you have not written and debugged a sendmail.cf file?

      Anyone who has knows that Sendmail should be boycotted for not properly crediting Lovecraft in the design of sendmail.cf

    5. Re:Duh by nabsltd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why? Does the mail server you are trying to connect to not support the latest SMTP RFC?

      Using "EHLO" can give you extended information that tells you the capabilities of the mail server, and when you're trying to diagnose a problem, that's a good thing. Many times I have figured out a mail server is misconfigured from only the response to "EHLO".

    6. Re:Duh by quenda · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was easier in the old days of acoustic modems, when we just whistled into our telephones.

  3. evolution branch by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you try the work they were doing here? They did mention that it's supposed to work with Exchange 2007.

    --
    "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
    1. Re:evolution branch by pinballer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've spent considerable time trying to get this work and it is still nowhere near being mature enough to be usable.

      Don't get me wrong, it's better than it was a few months ago. It will allow Evolution to make a connection and even download most of the folder information. For us, it has trouble deciphering email addresses in the headers, doesn't display some messages at all and, most annoyingly, continues to consume all available memory until it crashes.

  4. Re:what am I missing here... by timster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, Exchange does support IMAP, but usually Exchange admins disable it for the explicit purpose of preventing people from using clients other than Outlook.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  5. Re:what am I missing here... by bonkeydcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upgrade to thundercougerfalconbird!

  6. What I did... by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just waited until the same higher-ups that forced the upgrade got so fed up with the poor performance of Exchange 2007 that they forced us to switch back.

    Took about 3 weeks.

  7. Re:what am I missing here... by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

    By default, Exchange 2007 has POP3 and IMAP services disabled out of the box. An administrator has to run services.msc and change their states from disabled to automatic, and start them. SMTP to the Internet also is disabled and needs to be explicitly enabled, and a command run to get anti-spam agents enabled and running. However, this is not out of malice, this is just a basic common sense "ship as few possibly hackable features running out of the box as possible, let the customer enable what he/she needs" philosophy.

    Once the services are enabled, Exchange 2007 is as good a POP/IMAP server as anything out there. Thunderbird works well with it. Of course, both the POP and IMAP servers support SSL/TLS.

    Maybe some Windows admins are trained to only allow Outlook to connect, but it takes almost no time at all to allow other E-mail clients such as Thunderbird or mail.app to work without any issues.

  8. OpenChange by KatTran · · Score: 5, Informative

    OpenChange is an open source MAPI client that supports all versions of Exchange up to and including 2007, it is native MAPI and thus does everything you would expect an Exchange client to do, and it does it a reasonable speed.

    http://www.openchange.org/

    There is already an Evolution plug-in that will be mainlined into GNOME 2.24. However, you can currently get it for Fedora 10 and other platforms.

    The current Evolution plug-in uses OWA web page scrapping and is really lame, and it most likely broke from web interface changes in 2007.

  9. Conform by not+already+in+use · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your job requires Windows, perhaps maybe you should, uhh, install Windows.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
  10. Re:what am I missing here... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exchange is more than a mail server.

    It's an Adventure!

  11. Probably IAG by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our email is being moved over to Exchange.. after being moved off Exchange, to something else.

    Previously, the admins dared not place Exchange on the internet, lest it be hacked. So the only way to get your mail was via VPN. Since they configure the concentrator to only allow Windows clients with the firewalling on, you can't access anything on your local network, and yea verily, this did sucketh.

    Presently, there is a public IMAP server (running some variety of not-Exhange). And it's nice to be able to get your email without crippling your network connection, and from the IMAP client of your choice (ie, Thunderbird), installed on the device of your choice.

    Soon, they intend to move us back onto Exchange. Because they still dare not place Exchange onto the internet, it will be secured behind something called Intelligent Application Gateway, which appears to be some kind of SSL proxy server.

    So our options are....

    • Use an IAG client, an MS only payware product, to tunnel IMAP.
    • Use Outlook 2007 which conveniently has the "Outlook Anywhere" feature, which seems to combine an IAG client and use XMLRPC calls, and i probably the same client implementation as....
    • Outlook Web Access, which comes in "functional version for IE" and "crap version for dirty smelly hippyware browsers"

    Given that the current solution works fine, I'm none too happy ; reading the announcement the first question that arose was "Are they idiots?", closely followed by "How fat was the wad of sweaty Billbucks they were given?"

    Your options are ; give money to MS, or use a client that sucks (OWA lite). All the other clients suck LESS than OWA Lite, but to access any of them you must give some money to MS. Minimum spend being "a copy of a MS operating system", for IE, and maximum being Outlook. I'm not sure what the license cost of an IAG tunnel client is, but since you have to run it on Windows, it's a guaranteed winner for MS.

  12. Re:Where's the outrage? by timrichardson · · Score: 4, Informative

    The OWA ("web scraping") Evolution plugin is no longer developed. The new approach is MAPI, which is the connectivity solution for Exchange 2007. Just search for Evolution Exchange MAPI.

  13. Re:Meh. by Kalriath · · Score: 4, Funny

    No. Lotus Notes is disqualified due to the "solution" requirement.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".