Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

EA Hit By Class-Action Suit Over Spore DRM

Posted by Soulskill on from the was-it-worth-the-hassle? dept.

The ever-growing unrest caused by the DRM involved with EA's launch of Spore came to a head on Monday. A woman named Melissa Thomas filed a class-action lawsuit against EA for their inclusion of the SecuROM copy-protection software with Spore. This comes after protests of the game's DRM ranged from a bombardment of poor Amazon reviews to in-game designs decrying EA and its policies. Some of those policies were eased, but EA has also threatened to ban players for even discussing SecuROM on their forums. The court documents (PDF) allege: "What purchasers are not told is that, included in the purchase, installation, and operation of Spore is a second, undisclosed program. The name of the second program is SecuROM ... Consumers are given no control, rights, or options over SecuROM. ... Electronic Arts intentionally did not disclose to any such purchasers that the Spore game disk also possessed a second, hidden program which secretly installed to the command and control center of the computer."

10 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Undisclosed? by scubamage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DINGDINGDING, we have a winner! Sometimes they list that there is, "antipiracy software" included, I hardly think that disclaimer explains away SecuROM.

  2. Re:simply boycott them by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Boycotting doesn't work anymore. I have been boycotting most music for years, yet the music companies just point their finger and blame the drop in sales to pirates. Software companies will do the same thing.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  3. Wrong word by psiphiorg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several times in the PDF, the word "uninstallable" is used. However, it is used incorrectly. If the program actually were "uninstallable", then one of two things would be the case: (1) you would be able to uninstall it, or (2) you would not be able to install it.

    Neither of these is the case. I believe the word the author was looking for was "ununinstallable", meaning that it could not be uninstalled.

    Let's hope the lawsuit is undismissable because of this typo.

    davidh

  4. Re:simply boycott them by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or they could just call 'em "Rentals" as they should and stick on DRM eula(which nobody will read anyway).

  5. Re:simply boycott them by jacquesm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If there are alternatives and those alternatives do well (without the DRM) then I'm sure the message will come across loud and clear.

    And if it doesn't then the market will take care of them eventually. We're really only in the beginnings of this phase of the copyright game and it will take a while for it to play out but I'm pretty confident that eventually all media will be DRM free and will use open standards. It's the vested interests that have the most to lose here, new talent really couldn't care less, they'll take the audience and run with it.

    --
    MP3 Search Engine
  6. Re:simply boycott them by scatters · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out StarDock's Gamers' Bill of Rights. http://www.stardock.com/about/newsitem.asp?id=1095

    Sins of a Solar Empire is an excellent RTS game, with frequent major updates.

    --
    A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
  7. Re:simply boycott them by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I boycott most music as well, but just because it sucks. The best music (IMO of course) was made in the 80's and 90's. The VAST majority of my downloaded music is content that I originally had a CD for, but have lost over the course of several moves.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  8. This doesn't work! by micron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I purchased Spore ( The Galactic edition ) from Amazon on September 8th, for overnight delivery.

    I could not get it installed. After 11 days of going back and forth with EA tech support, EA informed me that they assigned the software key to someone else on September 7th. EA's solution, "return the software to my place of purchase".

    Sounds great, but companies such as EA have told vendors not to take returns on software that is no longer in the shrinkwrap.

    I have pointed out to EA that the only viable solution is for them to issue me a new key.

    I have heard nothing from EA on this since Saturday.

    Maybe it is time to fire up the lawyers. EA took my money, and has not given me a product in exchange.

  9. Re:simply boycott them by Shatrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Steam has a bigger problem.
    When you're tired of one game you can't sell it or give it away without doing the same with ALL of your Steam games, or using a separate account for each game.
    Whenever possible I avoid purchasing games through Steam if they are available otherwise.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  10. Re:simply boycott them by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Keeping in mind that in my, what, 16 years of playing games on a PC I've yet to actually sell a game, that doesn't really concern me much.