Slashdot Mirror


Universal Surface Scanner Detected

mcgrew writes to tell us that scientists at the University of California, San Diego, have created a new system that can test any surface for just about anything. "Their idea uses a thin layer of metal drilled with nanoscale holes, laid onto the surface being tested. When the perforated plate is zapped with laser light, the surface plasmons that form emit light with a frequency related to the materials touching the plate. A sensitive light detector is needed to measure the frequency of light given off. The team says devices using this approach can be small and portable, will work on very low power, and could detect everything from explosives to bacteria. All that needs to be done now is build a system able to decode the light signatures."

19 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Summary by Umuri · · Score: 5, Funny

    R&D: We have this awesome device! And it can tell you everything about anything!

    Boss: That sounds great, so what does it say about, say, this test material?

    R&D: ....

    R&D: We don't know yet. We don't know how to read it yet.

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    1. Re:Summary by fotbr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like a good way to obtain more funding.

      Write up another grant proposal or three, have another round of graduate students write their thesis/dissertations on the project, etc.

    2. Re:Summary by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Reminded me of Dilbert:

      Co-worker: I've not slept for a whole week trying to write this report. I thought I'd never make it, but last night I caught a lucky break, and got a visit from some Monkey Gods who wrote the entire thing for me.

      Dilbert: Wow. Lucky break.

      Co-worker: Now all I need is someone who can translate his simple yet beautiful language...

  2. Finally! by Bicx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe now we will be able to determine what can be found McDonald's hamburger patty.

    1. Re:Finally! by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, you need to use the Preview feature.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Finally! by xerxesVII · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you can help me. I accidentally a whole McDonald's hamburger patty.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
  3. Bacteria? by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would this type of detector be able to differentiate between species of bacteria?

  4. I happen to be an expert in SPR by seeker_1us · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Using nanoholes is just a variation on the grating method, and these people are combining it with SPR polarization work trailblazed by a Russian scientist that I had the good fortune to meet several years go. Nice gadget, but it's evolutionary, not revolutionary.

    And the optical sensor, while being non-trivial, doens't just sense magically everything from explosives to bacteria. You have to chemically engineer receptors . That's also very non-trivial.

  5. Let's invent our own amazing devices! by Robert1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll start.

    It's called a transporter, it dematerializes and re-materializes anything placed on a raised platform. I have built the platform, all that needs to be done now is to figure out how to de/re-materialize objects.

    I've also invented a portable fusion reactor. The concept is that I can fuse everyday objects - garbage - to make unlimited energy. I've got a bunch of garbage, all that needs to be done is figure out how to fuse at room temperatures.

    Ok, now you guys come up with amazing inventions. You know, just like the guy in the article did.

  6. Could be useful even when limited by Bicx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It does seem humorous that the scientist claimed he built a multi-surface detector which actually doesn't detect anything in particular. However, even if a few surfaces can be detected, this invention could be extremely useful in several fields. For instance, you might be able to use it to differentiate between very similar minerals or metals, or possibly even determine what combination of materials exist in a single surface. This could save a significant amount of time in testing and traditional analysis.

  7. Awesome headline by cortesoft · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Universal Surface Scanner Detected? Did it show up on radar suddenly or something?

    Radar Operator: Chief, we have detected something on radar!

    Chief: What is it?

    Radar Operator: It appears to be some sort of Universal Surface Scanner.....

  8. Scanner Detected? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Universal Surface Scanner Detected

    I wasn't aware that a universal surface scanner existed, nor that there was a detector built to detect universal surface scanners. Now that I know that such a detector exists, and that it has detected a universal surface scanner, I am wondering: was there some sort of SETI-like project - a vast array of detectors just searching for signs of a universal surface scanner? I don't recall anything like this coming up on Slashdot before. How do we know that the detectors haven't registered a false positive. Maybe this isn't a universal surface scanner, but merely a universal surface sensor. Maybe it isn't a universal surface scanner, but one of those surface scanners that can scan the surface of most things, but has problems when it comes to surfaces that are shiney.

    Where is this universal surface scanner? Is it something that we can duplicate, now that we know it exists? Is it something that we can retrieve from wherever it is and start scanning surfaces?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  9. yes, but can it detect explosive bacteria? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if it's just down to detecting the frequency of the light emitted, couldn't some sort of photovoltaic or photoelectric sensor be designed so that you wouldn't have to chemically engineer receptors for different kinds of surfaces, but rather just program the software to identify the surface material?

    1. Re:yes, but can it detect explosive bacteria? by seeker_1us · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not about detecting frequency. It's about detecting the conversion of light energy to plasmon-polariton energy. This is typically done by monitoring the change of intensity somehow. The polarization work that I mentioned was a very interesting method of detecting this conversion, because only one polarization (p-polarization) will convert.

      Plasmons are very sensitive to the localized index of refraction at a surface. To put it simply, you change the localized index of refraction by sticking something to the surface, like a chemical or a virus envelope protein or a bacteria. When something sticks, it changes the conversion efficiency of light.

      However, ANYTHING sticking will change the conversion efficiency of light: the amount depends only on the relative index of refraction of the adsorbed material and it's thickness.

      To have a chemical or biological sensor, you have to engineer receptors, so that only certain things stick to certain places. One of the nice things about this gadget is that it is an array sensor, so they can put numerous receptors down (e.g. one for hepatitis-c virus envelope protein in one spot, one for e-coli in another spot).

    2. Re:yes, but can it detect explosive bacteria? by Biff+Stu · · Score: 3, Informative

      if it's just down to detecting the frequency of the light emitted, couldn't some sort of photovoltaic or photoelectric sensor be designed so that you wouldn't have to chemically engineer receptors for different kinds of surfaces, but rather just program the software to identify the surface material?

      This is clearly their intention. However, for a spectroscopic solution to work, they must have clear spectral features for their target species, they must have a laser that can cover all the possible frequencies of interest, and a detector that will detect all the relevant frequencies. So, if they combine a universal laser with a universal spectrometer, their universal surface sensor will be complete.

      For some target materials, the problem of distinct and unique spectral features can be a big one. For things like bacteria, containing a multitude of molecules with similar spectral features but slightly different function, you end up with spectral soup. I believe that there are some spectral features that indicate that you have bacteria, and not some other generic background material, such as pollen. However, you then need to say that you have some nasty material, and not just the usual microbes that are everywhere. I don't know how you do that without chemical receptors. Finally, if the receptors rely on DNA, you need to do a bit of biochemistry to actually get to the DNA.

      Explosives could work, since you're dealing with specific molecules. However, in many scenarios if you need to touch the sample you're too damn close.

  10. There is a Special Place in Hell .... by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right Next to the Hottest Furnace, and it's reserved for people who utter the phrase "All you gotta do now is write the software"

    From the summary - "All that needs to be done now is build a system able to decode the light signatures.""

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  11. Re:It's a tricorder! by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually "Star Trek tricorder invented" is what I had for a headline in the original submission, and it's what the blurb on New Scientist's page said.

    Don't let anybody tell you ScuttleMonkey doesn't edit!

  12. All that needs to be done... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whenever an article about an amazing new breakthrough contains the words all that needs to be done I deflate my expectations and walk quietly away. All that needs to be done here is to actually get it working. Who knows, the scanner plate is small, but it may require a computer the size of a major city's sports arena to handle the results.

    Move along, there's nothing to see here yet.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  13. Food Tricorder by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe now we will be able to determine what can be found McDonald's hamburger patty.

    You laugh, but what I'd like to do with such a thing ain't so far off the mark from that...

    Basically, my wife has Celiac disease - if she eats food that has wheat flour or bread crumbs in it (even in very small quantities) it makes her sick. Long-term consequences from repeated poisonings include a higher risk of intestinal cancer...

    So the problem is, eating out, it's often hard to know what's safe to eat. If I could get some kind of scanner that could detect gluten in food... that would be awesome.

    Of course, from the way this thing works it sounds like the gluten would have to be somewhere near the surface of the food... So I guess it's way too early to get excited...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.