Slashdot Mirror


Adobe Flaw Allows Full Movie Downloads For Free

webax writes with this excerpt from Reuters: "[An Adobe security hole] exposes online video content to the rampant piracy that plagued the music industry during the Napster era and is undermining efforts by retailers, movie studios and television networks to cash in on a huge Web audience. 'It's a fundamental flaw in the Adobe design. This was designed stupidly,' said Bruce Schneier ... The flaw rests in Adobe's Flash video servers that are connected to the company's players installed in nearly all of the world's Web-connected computers. The software doesn't encrypt online content, but only orders sent to a video player such as start and stop play. To boost download speeds, Adobe dropped a stringent security feature that protects the connection between the Adobe software and its players." webax also notes that the article suggests DRM as a potential solution to the problem.

6 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Doublethink by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, so even Bruce Schneier is subject to the DRM double think now? What part of this is hard to understand? You have to give the viewer the key so it can decrypt the video stream and play it to the user.. if the user can see it, the user can record it. Game over. No amount of "encryption" can change the facts.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Doublethink by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The dumb part here is that they send the whole movie to your computer even if you're just watching the free two-minute preview. The two-minute restriction is only enforced in the flash applet.

      Web programming 101.
      Children, repeat after me: When you program for the web, NEVER, EVER trust the client.

    2. Re:Doublethink by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, there are many points to the article, but one of them is that someone can watch the movie for free because Adobe's server software is set up to continue streaming the movies after showing the free "clip". That, indeed, is "stupid", it relies upon trusted client software. DRM is one solution to this problem, but another is not to stream content to people's PCs they haven't paid for.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  2. Ming boggles... by PineGreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...at how fuckin dumb this all is. If you can see it, you can copy it, maybe it is more difficult, but not impossible. Do these idiots never ever learn?

  3. in case you hadn't noticed by drDugan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    sadly, axxo and fxg and their black market friends already figured out years ago how to get movies for free to most anyone willing to look for them. it brings the end of an industry in it's current form.

    There are better models: allow people, if they choose, to take media without paying for it, but give them credit, additional access, and membership benefits when customers do sponsor/pay for the media they consume. It is really not that complicated... find something you can sell because you can no longer technically control the distribution of your product.

    Major media producers cannot change the progression of technology with policy and lawsuits. They would be so much better off to adopt what tech can enable, and build effective business models around providing customers with real value when they do pay for media, instead of using fear and lawsuits to force them to pay when they don't have to.

  4. From the article: by jrockway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem exposes online video content to the rampant piracy that plagued the music industry during the Napster era and is undermining efforts by retailers, movie studios and television networks to cash in on a huge Web audience.

    Uh, the pirates were already uploading the full HD rips to Usenet days before the movies were even released. No pirate would want the shitty version Amazon is offering.

    --
    My other car is first.