Slashdot Mirror


Simple Device Claimed To Boost Fuel Efficiency By Up To 20%

Ponca City, We love you writes "Temple University physics professor Rongjia Tao has developed a simple device that could dramatically improve fuel efficiency in automobiles by as much as 20 percent. The device, attached to the fuel line of a car's engine near the fuel injector, creates an electric field that thins fuel, reducing its viscosity so that smaller droplets are injected into the engine. Because combustion starts at the droplet surface, smaller droplets lead to cleaner and more efficient combustion. Six months of road testing in a diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz automobile showed an increase from 32 miles per gallon to 38 mpg, a 20 percent boost, and a 12-15 percent gain in city driving. 'We expect the device will have wide applications on all types of internal combustion engines, present ones and future ones,' Tao wrote in the study published in Energy & Fuels. 'This discovery promises to significantly improve fuel efficiency in all types of internal combustion engine powered vehicles and at the same time will have far-reaching effects in reducing pollution of our environment,' says Larry F. Lemanski, Senior Vice President for Research and Strategic Initiatives at Temple."

16 of 674 comments (clear)

  1. I've got one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got one of these and together with the fuel line magnets, electric turbocharger and hydrogen generator I have fitted I find the gas tank actually fills as I drive!

  2. Re:Next stop, infomercial and/or MLM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    No you idiot, the car companies threatened to kill them if htye sold it when the last people came up with this inventionn! Magnets do some INCREDIBLE things with science and people's energy fields. But I don't care what you think; I know the truth! Ever since I started wearing my magnet wrist watch I haven't needed birth control!

    So there, suck on that--ha HA!

  3. Awesome, doing it myself right now by unassimilatible · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, going to increase my mileage by doing it myself, I'll just hook up some battery cables to my fuel lines to charge the gas. Alrighty then, black lead to ground, other end to fuel line. Check. Red lead to positive terminal, check. Now, I'll complete the circuit, just let me affix the read lead to the fuel l

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  4. Re:This is... by LaskoVortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    these "devices you attach to the fuel line" have been around being sold by con-artists for at least TEN YEARS

    TFA says he's getting a patent. The US patent office wouldn't be so clueless as to issue a patent if there were prior art, now would it? ;o)

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  5. Re:Typical slashdot vaporware by wfberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Long term option? Not at all. The oil in Alaska and offshore doesn't last forever. It is a mid term solution at best.

    Snakes on the other hand can simply be bred, making snakeoil a renewable and CO2 neutral resource.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  6. Re:This is... by ScreamingCactus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't Mythbusters bust this one last year?

    --
    The path to enlightenment is truly through homemade drugs!
  7. you forgot to add 250lb adults by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    add 2 x 250lb adults and a fat kid or three, and theres an extra 1000 to haul.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  8. Re:Next stop, infomercial and/or MLM by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Funny

    [...]devices that perform sexually acts on you,[...]

    This is a bad example in your list, as they are nothing new.

    They are still available these days, as they were in the 70s. Usually not for sale. Typical monikers for these devices that do not charge directly for their operations are "girlfriend", "boyfriend", "mistress", "husband" or "wife". If in need you can always try to rent them, this version is often called "prostitute" or "hooker", though in many countries sold under euphemisms as "escort" or "masseuse".

    This post is not a recommendation of their use, particularly not while driving. While their use may have a bad effect on your fuel usage, the main concern is safety.

  9. Re:Next stop, infomercial and/or MLM by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you need is a high enough electric field and your typo injection efficiency will go up.

    --
  10. Re:This is... by The+Dobber · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll believe it when I see Billie Mays selling it.

  11. Re:Blind testing needed by WSQuant · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The proper blind testing of course would be to install it in say ten cars"

    Well, I really don't think we should let blind people drive. Anyway, I am pretty sure it is illegal in every state, except New Jersey.

  12. Re:Blind testing needed by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1, Funny

    As a lifelong resident of New Jersey, I can say that the only blind drivers are from Pennsylvania.

    --
    If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
  13. What *I* heard... by autophile · · Score: 3, Funny

    What *I* heard about it is that if you put a Time Cube in it, and install it on your water pipes, you'll get instant health!

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  14. Re:This is... by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Funny

    People keep buying cheap gas

    Really? Where?!

  15. Re:This is... by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Engineers could design the best nozzle that's possible within the realm of physics, getting perfect misting, and if the owner doesn't take care of it then that gunk is still going to build up, and economy is still going to suffer over time.

    When my printer manufacturer manages to provide automatic nozzle cleaning, I would think that car manufacturers would be able to do the same.

  16. With thanks and apologies to Cory Doctorow . . . by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your post proposes a

    ( ) mechanical (X) thermal ( ) gravitational (X) electrical (X) voodoo

    approach to create infinite/cheap energy. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws.

    ( ) You made a math error
    (X) You have made a faulty assumption
    (X) You don't understand physics
    ( ) You keep saying "greater than unity"
    (X) You're relying on self-reported data
    (X) You're relying on an uncontrolled experiment

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    (X) Mechanical Friction
    (X) Physical constants
    ( ) Laws of motion
    (X) Laws of thermodynamics
    ( ) Asshats
    ( ) Gravity
    (X) Turbulence
    ( ) Division by zero yielding undefined result
    ( ) Unit conversions
    ( ) Unavailability of infinately strong materials
    ( ) Unavailability of a perfect vacuum
    ( ) Solar heating
    ( ) Stuff that's lighter than air still having mass
    ( ) Translation losses

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    (X) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
    (X) Smarter people than you have tried to do this before

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    (X) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    (X) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.