Russian Police Know Who Wrote Gpcode Virus
rifles only writes "Russian police
almost certainly know the identity of the programmer responsible for the frightening 'ransomware' crypto virus, Gpcode, which has hit the Internet several times since 2006, says a story at Techworld, which has tapped a Kaspersky Lab researcher. Gpcode used 1024-bit RSA/128-bit RC4 to lock up victims' data, an uncrackable combination that left the world with only one solution: find the virus author to get the master key. So why don't the cops do anything? Good question, but this is Russia we're talking about."
"Good question, but this is Russia we're talking about." ?? Someone care to enlighten me what that was about?
And when the cops assigned a whole army to stop Jimmy, what did he do?
He made them partners.
-Peter
"According to Kaspersky, stopping ransomware-based malware in the future will require more effective law enforcement, the use of forensic software analysis to tie suspects to their malevolent creations, and possibly building restrictions into the Windows cryptographic software libraries used to create Gpcode itself."
This concerns me more than what the cops do as pointed out in the story there's the difficulty of getting the money back to the ransomware author.
Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
Theres a world of difference between knowing who did something, and having enough proof to be able to arrest them, charge them and convict them.
That's a good point someone brought up. In the situation of ransom, how
will it ever work?
If large amount of funds are transferred by bank, they can
find and freeze the bank account.
If large amount of funds are transferred in cash,
the money can be traced so you would be caught if you use it.
So What is the the point in ransoming in the current era? There must be
something I am missing.
It is implied that in Russia there are no rights, if the government wants something or someone it doesn't think twice about getting it regardless of the ramifications.
Of course that is not much different from Western Countries, we just like to pretend otherwise.
* Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
The picture this arcticle paints leads me to believe that proof is optional in the arrest, charge, convict process.
Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
Yet again the summary misleads, but it's no secret the Russian authorities don't have the resources to investigate anything of importance, and that problem leads to the iconic corruption that brings it full-circle.'
-Billco, Fnarg.com
you mean not everything bad that happens is a communist plot?
on a more interesting note, TFA states that yahoo has refused to cooperate with law-enforcement on this case on "privacy grounds." but didn't they hand over the user info on several Chinese dissidents, which led to an American national being falsely imprisoned?
i guess Yahoo will protect a user's privacy as long as they're a malicious criminal, but not if they're a prisoner of conscience. i guess it's time for me to close up my Yahoo! mail account for good.
If RC4 is broken and "badly so", where is the recovery tool to find the keys?
You know, whenever someone starts a sentence with "it's no secret that" or "everybody knows that" or something similar, whatever follows will be a lie.