Slashdot Mirror


Motorola To Hire 300 Android Developers

ruphus13 writes "Google's Android is starting to see more industry support. Motorola recently announced plans, despite hardships within the company, to hire 300 Android developers. Quoting: 'A quick search of Motorola's job openings suggests that, indeed, Android is set to become a permanent fixture at Motorola, which has long built Linux-based phones but hitherto used MontaVista's Mobilinux. The goal? Move from an internal development pool of 50 Android-savvy developers to 350. Motorola, recognizing that most developers won't have deep experience with Google Android, is looking for a somewhat general skillset ... Java and Google Android programming experience is listed as 'highly desirable,' but not required.'" T-Mobile has already made plans to use Android as well. Xconomy has a related interview with a member of the MIT team that won a $275,000 prize in the Android Developer Challenge by creating an application to automatically modify a phone's settings depending on its location, which they say "wouldn't even be possible on an iPhone." We've previously discussed the Challenge itself and some of the other winning apps.

7 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. First it was outsourcing... by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and now they hire android developers? When will this end?!

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
    1. Re:First it was outsourcing... by florescent_beige · · Score: 4, Funny

      Android developer QQA2504?

      Yes master.

      Compute the value of pi to the final digit.

      Computing...coommmpppuuutttinnggggg...coooooommmmmmmmmmpp...

      *POP*

      (Feet up on desk). And thus once again job security is ensured.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  2. This could be very promising. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Motorola makes some fairly solid hardware; but their cellphone software has been marked by galling suckitude for some time. If they can use android to give their typically solid lower midrange hardware software with higher end features(real browser, email, not sucking, etc.) they could have a very promising product on their hands.

  3. Ahhh... do no evil by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a clear technicality. They're hiring emotionless androids who will do no evil, but also no good. Simply because they won't know the difference.

    From Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five:
    "This, too, was the title of a book by Trout, The Gutless Wonder. It was about a robot who had bad breath, who became popular after his halitosis was cured. But what made the story remarkable, since it was written in 1932, was that it predicted the widespread use of burning jellied gasoline on human beings. It was dropped on them from airplanes. Robots did the dropping. They had no conscience, and no circuits which would allow them to imagine what happens to people on the ground. Trout's leading robot looked like a human being, and could talk and dance and so on, and go out with girls. And nobody held it against him that he dropped jellied gasoline on people. But they found his halitosis unforgivable. But then he cleared that up, and he was welcomed to the human race."

  4. Re:How will Google make money? by operator_error · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google makes money by offering an alternative eco-system conducive to Google's world view; which by the way can differ from Microsoft's. Google *is* web-services for example and MS just discovered the word 'Cloud'.

    From Google's perspective, if they didn't offer mobile and PC clients (i.e. Chrome) the alternatives are limited, and don't necessarily present Google apps in the best light, (especially if the world otherwise coded for Active-X).

  5. Re:How will Google make money? by thammoud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google will make money by having its applications (and thus more chance for advertisement revenue) distributed on as many phones as possible.

  6. Re:Good ol' Motorola by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Informative

    um... i really don't think their membership was motivated by "pure desperation" considering how many major industry players are a part of the Open Handset Alliance:

    • China Mobile - the world's largest mobile phone operator.
    • KDDI - formed in 2000 in a 3-way merger and is already Japan's second-largest cellular operator with 20% market share and growing.
    • NTT DoCoMo - the number one mobile phone operator in Japan.
    • HTC - a premier Taiwanese ODM who designs a large number of popular handsets which are sold rebranded by major carriers like: Orange, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel, O2, Vodafone, AT&T, Alltel, Bell Mobility and Telus Mobility. (the T-Mobile G1 was originally conceived as the HTC Dream.)
    • Telecom Italia - the largest Italian phone company and cellular operator.
    • Telefonica - the dominant phone operator in Spain, and the 3rd largest carrier in the world. (behind China Mobile and Vodafone)
    • Broadcom - one of the top 20 semiconductor/IC suppliers in the world (after companies such as Panasonic, Qualcomm, NEC, etc.)
    • Qualcomm - another top 20 worldwide semiconductor sales leader. they also developed EV-DO and other CDMA-based wireless transmission standards.
    • Marvell Technology Group - producer of storage, communications, and semiconductor products. they designed the first Gigabit all-CMOS read channel, the first Gigabit-capable system-on-a-chip (embedded system), and the first SATA interface solution. their wireless devices are used in the OLPC program.
    • Synaptics - a touchpad OEM provider for most laptop manufacturers, like Asus, Acer, Dell, HP, Sony, Toshiba, Gateway, IBM, Lenovo, Samsung, Packard Bell, etc.

    not to mention the more well-known members, such as: Spring Nextel, T-Mobile, Intel, Nvidia, Texas Instruments, Google, eBay, LG, and Samsung. given the purpose of the Open Handset Alliance, it wouldn't make sense for Motorola not to be a member. Microsoft and Apple are pretty much the only industry leaders for it not to make sense for them to join the OHA.

    if you want to remain a relevant player in the mobile industry, wouldn't it make sense for you to be a part of the organization that is developing the open standards that are going to be used? unless you have an exclusive contract with Microsoft to only use Windows Mobile, or have your own mobile platform like the iPhone, and thus do not require interoperability with any other technologies.