Artists Strive To Wrest Rights From Music Industry

eldavojohn writes "The funny thing about the RIAA & BPI is that the artists are just as tired as the fans with how online music is being handled. So they're trying something new called the Featured Artists' Coalition. FAC's site states in their charter: 'We believe that all music artistes should control their destiny because ultimately it is their art and endeavors that create the pleasure and emotion enjoyed by so many.' As digital releases are increasing, the artists aren't seeing any more money. With the advent of online distribution, are the traditional music industry functions of promotion, samples, radio, and marketing now nothing but costly overhead for the artists? From Iron Maiden to Kate Nash to Radiohead, some big names are backing this new organization."

Comments

Death to labels, long live music

[Anonymous Coward]

If there is any way that you can help (adding a banner to link to their website, putting flyers up where appropriate, etc), please do.

Well.

[Creepy Crawler]

Here it is. The start of the final fall of the RIAA and its ilk.

The musicians and songwriters are revolting and refusing to be put in their place.

The only question remains: Will they re-do what the RIAA has done? Will they seek an iron-fist of control?

Re:Well.

[HiVizDiver]

I do firmly believe that the RIAA (and, by extension, the MPAA) are FAR from out of tricks. They didn't get to the positions they are by being stupid, just greedy.

I fervently hope that I'm wrong, but we've been hearing the "This is it! The death of the RIAA!" announcements for YEARS.

Sorry if this is offtopic but...

[fiannaFailMan]

... actually it's not offtopic since it refers to a tag on this story - but why are all the stories now being tagged 'story?' What's it going to be next? Tagging them with 'words?'

We need market to decide the price of any album

[unity100]

I dont want MBA types deciding what price should an album from a particular artist should be sold. they naturally decide on how much they can get out of the pockets of the consumer.

and since, artist is bound by contract to the label, it is another form of monopoly - you wont be able to get records of that artist from any other label.

lets not fool ourselves. this is no competition. just like in the fields of patenting, it hurts our society.

we need market decide what they want to pay for any music piece. or, the artist even.

So does this mean people will stop pirating?

[bonch]

One of the justifications I often hear for piracy is that you're revolting against record labels. Are people now saying that they will in fact stop pirating music if the RIAA isn't a factor?

Why do I have a hard time believing that?

Re:So does this mean people will stop pirating?

[FridgeFreezer]

This is my rationale too - If an artist only gets 25% of my money currently, I'll happily pay them that amount directly (or a little more) as it is cutting out a huge swathe of arseholes all taking a cut and contributing nothing of value.

With the current system, buying music legitimately is a bit like funding terrorism - the vast majority of your money goes to the people who are responsible for all the stuff that's wrong with the industry.