Slashdot Mirror


Election Dirty Tricks About To Begin

An anonymous reader writes "ABC is warning that dirty election tricks are about to start. In the past, they've ranged from late-night robo-calls to voter intimidation. ABC has a pretty good list of what to watch out for as told by Allen Raymond, a former Republican operative, who was reformed after spending three months in prison in 2006 for pulling some of the stunts he now helps to prevent." To make this story timely, last week someone broke into a McCain campaign office in Missouri and stole a laptop computer containing "strategic information" about the local campaign.

9 of 942 comments (clear)

  1. "almost no questions asked" by Bearpaw · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... except for:

    1) citizenship
    2) name
    3) birthdate
    4) state driver's license or SSN (required)

    But hey, they're poor, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to vote. Especially since they so often vote the wrong way, and thus prove how unAmerican they are.

  2. Plague, not pox by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 4, Informative

    "A plague on both your houses" is the correct line (from Romeo and Juliet)

    --
    "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
  3. Re:I'm already a victim of these tactics by GaryPatterson · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is a horrifyingly accurate post. The real victors in war are the people who sell the bullets. Everyone else only plays along to use their products.

  4. Solutions [Re:No, the real trick] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The pointlessness of a two-party system based on false antagonisms and dichotomies. Sadly, there seems to be no hope in sight.

    Either approval voting or range voting (aka score votingwould break the forced two-valued dichotomy of the current system.

    (In fact, approval voting is just one version of range voting-- in games theory, they are identical).

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  5. Re:Already started by Ioldanach · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, reminding people that voter fraud is a felony is voter intimidation? Wrong.

    It is when you're trying to convince a voter who's voting in the right state that he's registered in a different state.

  6. Re:dirty tricks by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

    You do realize that one of the Republican party's strategy for the last hundred years or so was to claim voter fraud wherever imaginable and then claim to be victimized by fictitious fraud, right? It's something that they started doing because they didn't want to count black votes.

    In fact it was on a down swing during much of the 90s because they lost a few key legal decisions and were barred from doing so.

    To suggest that there's anything improper or illegal going on there is suggesting far more than the facts dictate. What was going on is that the Republican party doesn't want the poor and homeless to be able to vote and so they throw up these spurious fraud complaints hoping to keep some legitimate votes from being counted.

  7. Re:I've seen dirty tricks firsthand by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    And, just in case anyone thinks I'm making this up, or that this doesn't happen in the 21st century, just go to this link (it's a search result page for the "The State," South Carolina's biggest newspaper). The sixth entry on the page is a full article detailing what happened at Benedict the last time they tried this (you can pay to read the whole thing if you like, but the summary should give you a good idea).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. Re:dirty tricks by onecheapgeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    From: http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/elections/voterInformation/regToVote.aspx

    What are the qualifications to register and to vote in Ohio?

    You are qualified to register to vote in Ohio if you meet all the following requirements:

          1. You are a citizen of the United States;
          2. You will be at least 18 years old on or before the day of the general election. (If you will be 18 on or before November 4, you may vote in the primary election for candidates, but you cannot vote on issues until you are 18);
          3. You will be a resident of Ohio for at least 30 days immediately before the election in which you want to vote;
          4. You are not incarcerated (in prison or jail) for a felony conviction under the laws of this state, another state or the United States;
          5. You have not been declared incompetent for voting purposes by a probate court; and
          6. You have not been permanently disenfranchised for violations of the election laws.

    You are eligible to vote in elections held in your voting precinct more than 30 consecutive days after you are duly registered to vote in this state.

    I see nothing about paying taxes. Nothing about owning land. Nothing about having families. Basically, you're talking out your ass with no factual basis for doing so. Because your points are all 100% wrong and 100% foul of Ohio election laws.

    Why isn't owning land allowed to let a vote count more? Because it violates the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. Section 1. "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Equal protection. As in all citizens count the same for voting.

    Furthermore, any use of taxes to determine voting rights or status falls foul of the 24th amendment. "The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reasons of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."

    If a homeless person can prove citizenship, there is no legal basis to deny or devalue their vote.

  9. Re:No, the real trick by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I suppose the Democratic majority congress had no hand in American politics these past several years then?

    Well, yes, they have. If for one, you call 18 months "several years" (nice spin, pal), and if for two you ignore at least twelve instances of Republican filibustering, and if for three you ignore the impact of a President who has used more presidential vetos than every other President in US history COMBINED, not to mention signing statement.

    Then I guess we could say that they've played a hand or two.

    Yes, I'm aware that they've also handled some of the things they have done horribly, but still. Nonetheless, nice try, Dittohead.