Slashdot Mirror


No IPv6 For UK Broadband Users

BT (the incumbent telephone company in the United Kingdom) are in the process of spending millions of pounds on upgrading their network to an all-IP core. However, they have failed to consider 21st Century protocol support, preferring to insist that IPv4 is enough for everyone. Haven't they noticed the IPv4 exhaustion report yet?

5 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. The border routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well I'm sure that we can address at border routers with the UK. Since they have to switch all of the bits from the left side to the right side of the tubes, they might as well do 6to4 as well.

    1. Re:The border routers by AndrewNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, if everyone but the UK moved to IPv6, wouldn't there be plenty of room in the IPv4 space just for them?

  2. What BT Stands For by manlygeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't you know that "BT" stands for "Behind the Times?" OTOH, If you insist on IPv6 you get to do lots of tunneling since almost no one else is on it either. Just goes to show you what happens to innovation in the presence of a large userbase and expensive infrastructure.

    --
    Be More, Be Manly, The Manly Geek Ubergeek Extraordinaire Blogger: www.manlygeek.com/blog Podcaster: podcast.man
  3. Re:Not all users though by EdZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    The parent clearly fails to realise that Virgin are a terrible provider (unreliable, capped transfers, packet shaping, unusually awful customer service, etc), the only users of which are those without a BT line who cannot afford to have one put in. As for their 'fibre optic' cable: It's plain and simple BS. They may use fibre between exchanges, but SO DOES EVERYONE ELSE. It's not even fibre to the kerb, let alone fibre to the home.

  4. Re:Internet in the UK will fall over... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But aside from that, what did the Romans ever do for them?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson