Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.6.27 Out

diegocgteleline.es writes "Linux 2.6.27 has been released. It adds a new filesystem (UBIFS) for 'pure' flash-based storage, the page-cache is now lockless, much improved Direct I/O scalability and performance, delayed allocation support for ext4, multiqueue networking, data integrity support in the block layer, a function tracer, a mmio tracer, sysprof support, improved webcam support, support for the Intel wifi 5000 series and RTL8187B network cards, a new ath9k driver for the Atheros AR5008 and AR9001 chipsets, more new drivers, and many other improvements and fixes. Full list of changes can be found here."

43 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. Linux 2.6.27 Out by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Linux 2.6.27 is out, OpenBSD 4.4 is in!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by AJWM · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've got some, what do you want moderated?

      Oh, wait...

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by baeksu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to worry, I can help!

      No, wait...crap.

      --
      Gnome: A never ending quest to make unix friendly to people who don't want unix and excruciating for those that do.
    3. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Okay, he can use my mod points because I'm posting AC. Now if only I had a Slashdot account...

    4. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of these days, the admins should give Anonymous Coward some mod points.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by fpophoto · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of these days, the admins should give Anonymous Coward some mod points.

      Mod parent up!

      If nothing else, it would just totally blow the AC's mind when he cruised by here. "WTF? Mod points?"

    6. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of these days, I'm going to chop you into little pieces.

    7. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by RLiegh · · Score: 4, Funny

      One of these days, Coward -POW, right in the kisser!

    8. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by ModernGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      sad part is i just pre-ordered the openbsd 4.4 cd set... hah. im not sure if i should be proud or ashamed.

      then again, i sometimes think im the last of the right-os-for-the-job heretics... openbsd on my firewall. solaris (with zfs) on my fileserver... mac os x on my main desktop... (i dabble in photoshop and video.. mostly failed fark contests. ha) and windows vista on my macbook pro (along side of os x of course)... because i do a lot of autocad/solidworks stuff on the side. my webserver runs gentoo..

      i guess you could call me a glutton for punishment.

      I am very impressed, your defenses on why you use what you do for your computing needs have foiled my plan to call you a fanboy/newb. It is like you already saw the attacks coming, and preemptively shot them down. You sir, have won three internets.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    9. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by hdparm · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, that would be Sun Microsystems.

    10. Re:Linux 2.6.27 Out by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Masturbating monkey" is what comes to mind.

      Which, coincidentally, is the name of an upcoming Ubuntu release.

  2. Barely on v.2.6.27? Sheesh, Windows way past that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Last I saw they were on version Windows 2000. The Linux is never gonna catch up!

  3. Re:Barely on v.2.6.27? Sheesh, Windows way past th by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Funny

    what number is Vista?

    666

  4. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Funny

    may I suggest Ubuntu 8.10?

    You have my permission.

  5. Huh??? by twistah · · Score: 2, Funny

    LOL, 2.6?? We already have 9.0 here in the office.

    1. Re:Huh??? by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your office is in the Panoptican Library on Gallifrey? Wasn't that destroyed in the Time War?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Huh??? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 4, Funny

      We already have 9.0 here in the office.

      That's pretty old now, and was crappy at the time. You really should look at upgrading to OSX. The discussion at hand is about Linux kernels though.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    3. Re:Huh??? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wasn't that destroyed in the Time War?

      That is will been destroyed in the time war. So nothing is stopped him from about to post that.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    4. Re:Huh??? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
      That is will been destroyed in the time war. So nothing is stopped him from about to post that.

      Dr. Dan Streetmentioner would like to interview you for a book on tense formations which he wioll haven been writing.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  6. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not so fast. Has he signed form WQ-37 and initialed C12-B first?

  7. Re:Change naming scheme by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, they can't release a 2.7, as SCO has already declared that that's the kernel that has the proprietary code in it. (Y'see, the Master, who cunningly disguised his alien identity by calling himself Darl, made an error in the time calculations and ended up traveling back in time too many years. Now's our chance to really screw up the space/time continuum.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  8. Re:Current Limiting? by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's a thought. If they're using Gentoo on a 386SX, using the -git kernel tree, and having it auto-rebuild whenever there's a change, they'd never actually get far enough in recompiling to ever be able to boot up a new kernel.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  9. Re:Did Bill Gates pay Shuttleworth to create Ubunt by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    If there were viruses on VMS (well, other than via DCL scripting in e-mail subject lines), I guess we'd be calling them SYS$kits.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  10. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by WK2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although, I guess they [Debian] made the decision for 2.6.26 before they realised that a September release would be an impossible target.

    Yeah. Nobody could have predicted that a Debian release would be late.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  11. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by martinw89 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, he's only filed a TPS report. He also missed that memo we all got.

  12. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe you have my stapler?

  13. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Debian never paid much attention to desktop features, may I suggest Ubuntu 8.10?

    No you may not. We are aware of that distro and have rejected it. We like Debian and use Debian. It is the best desktop system as far as I am concerned.

  14. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he is referring to the lack of polish that Ubuntu has.

    s/Ubuntu/Debian/g

  15. Re:Thank you Linus. by __aardcx5948 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much of the code is from Linus himself nowadays? I thought he mostly reviewed/rejected patches, and occasionally, once every to or so years, accepted a patch or two. ;-)

  16. MOD GP DOWN by Almahtar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because I wrote the comment for heaven's sake, and it was meant to be funny not insightful.

    Hell I can't figure out why it could be seen as insightful.

  17. Re:This is a huge amount of work by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

    But you can only waste time on Slashdot if you *both* agree to cover for each other. This is an unacceptable solution.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  18. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by kv9 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So? Download and build your own kernel..

    Or get Windows or Mac and never have to hear that.

    I bet you buy your LEGO preassembled too.

  19. atheros is in, excellent by paniq · · Score: 2, Funny

    i've been running my girlfriends new laptop on ndiswrapper drivers for the past year because so far they have been the most painless. it's great to see the new atheros drivers integrated.

    it seems these days it doesn't take long until a new driver finds its way into the kernel, and i'm not being sarcastic. one year between obscure hardware release and driver in kernel is fine.

    --
    Do not trust this signature.
  20. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he is referring to the lack of polish that Ubuntu has.

    If you're *that* hung up about a polish language version of Ubuntu, you can do it yourself you know :-)

  21. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by alexhs · · Score: 3, Funny

    s/Ubuntu/Debian/g

    gives

    I think he is referring to the lack of polish that Debian has. I find Debian's default Gnome desktop atrocious. I prefer their KDE or their base install. Debian, on the other hand, does a very good job with Gnome while Kubuntu lags.

    I think you meant s/Ubuntu/Debian/ , only first occurence replaced, not all. Using v to only select

    I think he is referring to the lack of polish that Ubuntu has.

    is cheating, no real hacker uses vim-specific features ;)

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  22. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    He got the memo, he just forgot.

  23. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How do I install this 'kernal' with Synaptic?

  24. I out source by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet you buy your LEGO preassembled too.

    I actually pay a LCSE(Lego Certified Systems Engineer) $150 per hour to assemble mine for me, its the only way to be sure.

  25. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Score:4, Informative?

    Christ.

  26. Re:Thank you Linus. by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

    I reckon I could reject hundreds of patches a day. Probably even more, if I wrote a script.

  27. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Funny

    a nice splash screen when I didn't feel like reading the boot log

    You could try using the "off switch" hardware feature present in most monitors for the duration of the boot. It's been supported since kernel 1.0.3, so no recimpile is needed.

    As a workaround if there is a bug, you could try rotating yourself 180 degrees about a vertical axis temporarily.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  28. Re:Building your own kernel these days ain't easy by Godji · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're looking for an attractive single woman that is also an OpenBSD core developer and would be willing to mate with a Gentoo core developer. And you're looking for her on Slashdot.

    Good luck with that. :)

  29. Re:Not in upcoming Debian by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1, Funny

    I always found it annoying, under Windows, to have to hunt down drivers.

    When's the last version of Windows you used?

    I've never bothered to hunt down a driver in XP or Vista, except for upgrading video card drivers. (Windows will do that automatically, but only to stripped-down versions without gaming features.) Joysticks, webcams, scanners, USB keys... everything's automatic and has been for awhile.