Slashdot Mirror


Verizon To Charge Content Providers $.03 Per SMS

An anonymous reader writes "It appears that Verizon is going to start double-dipping by charging both consumers AND content providers for SMS text messages. Verizon has informed content partners that it will levy a $.03 charge for messages sent to customers, effective November 1. From RCRWireless: 'Countless companies could be affected by the new fee, from players in the booming SMS-search space (4INFO, Google Inc. and ChaCha) to media companies (CNN, ESPN and local outlets) to mobile-couponing startups (Cellfire) to banks and other institutions that use mobile as an extension of customer services.'"

9 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. They have it all wrong by Bryansix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ONLY the sender should be charged for SMS. You can't choose which ones you receive so why should you pay for them?

  2. Re:email? by spazdor · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they did, I'm charging them to read it.

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  3. Post Office Tax by spikenerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the 90's there was an email circulating around claiming that the US Post Office was going to charge a fifteen cent tax on every email sent. I laughed myself silly about people that were actually stupid enough to believe it. If it ever happened, I was sure we could just encode emails so they wouldn't recognize them. Now, that I see people are actually stupid enough to *PAY* fifteen cents to send a message over the same lines on which they speak for free, it's not quite so funny anymore.

  4. Just crazy... by apathy+maybe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I never understood the "pay to receive" idea in the first place.

    Anyway, in Australia (at least with one of the companies), you have two types of message. The ones that someone sends to you, and they pay for it. Then there are "premium" services (such as weather, news, games whatever), which you pay to request.

    Charging to send AND receive? Greedy bastards should be lined up against the wall and shot.

    Viva le revolution!

    --
    I wank in the shower.
  5. cancel your verizon subscription today by blzb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    so now verizon is charging other people money to *call you*. aren't you alrady paying verizon to have a phone number just so people can call you and send you messages.

    you would have to be a real sucker to let verizon charge your friends and associates money to communicate with you, on top of what they are already paying *their* phone company to send the message in the first place.

  6. Re:email? by madhurms · · Score: 5, Funny

    More importantly, is it 0.03 dollar or 0.03 cents? :)

  7. Re:Timing is suspect by xant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's safe to say that Verizon and its little friends are big fans of the current surveillance-friendly administration, seeing as how the W administration just gave the telcos the world's largest "Get Out Of Jail Free" card with their little "retroactive immunity" bill.

    *sigh* Obama voted for it. (I'm voting for him anyway.)

    Of course, I'm suspicious of the way gas prices suddenly drop in October of years divisible by 4, too. :)

    They drop every October. Every September, too. People drive more in the summer.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  8. I canceled by dj245 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I canceled my Verizon Wireless yesterday (for other reasons). If you want out of your contract with no questions asked, print out This page and take it in with you to the verizon office. Tell them this is a change to your contract and that you would like to cancel. Ask them to waive the cancel fee. Done. You even get to keep your phone (they told me to sell it on Ebay). This assumes that you were a customer back in April.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  9. Re:email? by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 5, Funny

    they're the same thing, sir.