Slashdot Mirror


Starcraft 2 To Be a Trilogy

The Starcraft 2 gameplay panel was an eventful one at Blizzcon today. The developers faced an obstacle when designing the game; the plans they had were just too massive to implement in a single game on anything approaching a reasonable timeline. Their solution was to divide the game up into three separate, stand-alone titles: Terran: Wings of Libery, Zerg: Heart of the Swarm, and Protoss: Legacy of the Void. Read on for further details. Each campaign will have on the order of 26-30 missions. The path players take through the missions can vary — the storyline branches frequently — but they will end in the same place. The games will run alongside each other; there will not be cliffhanger endings leading from one to another, and each game will focus on a different part of the story. The Terran campaign will focus on Jim Raynor, and the Zerg campaign will be all about Kerrigan. Multiplayer functionality will be in place for all three races from the start.

16 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Stand-along Titles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You mean like Sing-along titles?

  2. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by stormguard2099 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just wish I could beat you over the head with the SUMMARY that you didn't even bother to read before blasting off a comment.

    Go back to youtube

    --
    http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  3. Allow me to translate... by lowlymarine · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We at Blizzard Entertainment value you, the wallet mounted on the back of an entranced magpie. As such, we wanted to ensure that StarCraft 2 was the highest quality money sink possible, while still extracting money from you soon. As such, it will be released in installments for the low, low price of $59.99 each. Naturally, each new installment will break multiplayer with previous ones. We hope you enjoy playing our games as much as we enjoy taking your money!"

  4. Effing brilliant by rk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those jackholes are going to make me shell out 150 to 200 dollars for this game, aren't they?

    God, Blizzard is evil!

  5. Re:Am I the only one? by Toonol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps you should have taken a moment to confirm that indeed, every other post in the thread says the exact same thing.

    Including this one; their stated reason is untrue, this is a marketing ploy to sell more units.

  6. pricing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    each installment is yours for $65 or grab the extended super amazing battle.net chest gold version for $200 with a collectors mouse pad and protoss boxers*

    * for a limited time only.

  7. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by DocHoncho · · Score: 2, Funny

    i was going to make some kind of contextual reply to your comment, but i just couldn't bring myself to read it.

    i only read the story tags.

    --
    Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
  8. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by Gewalt · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've gone from RTFA to RTFS, now.

    Do people on /. actually read anything?

    I read your comment. I can has cookie?

    --
    Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
  9. Quite... For all we know... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    They could also be giving them away for free.

    To third world children.

    With their free Blizzard-sponsored OLPC.

    And a lollipop.

    Chery flavor.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Quite... For all we know... by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Funny

      and a pony

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  10. Re:Shenanigans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's a naked grab for cash.

    What a freakin' great idea for a gameshow!

  11. Victim of WoW's success by Stickerboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the conversation now at Blizzard's headquarters:

    Bean counter: "Hey, we're making money hand over fist with World of Warcraft! How can you justify diverting money into an expensive new project without subscriptions?"
    Developer: "We could put subscriptions into multiplayer."
    Bean counter: "No, that could take away from our golden cash cow."
    Developer: "We... could split the single player into three map packs and charge for all three?"
    Bean counter: "Won't consumers feel gipped? Could that cut into sales?"
    Developer: "We'll add more 'mine X resource, build Y units and rush the enemy base' missions to fluff it out. Total gameplay hours will be 3 times as long!"
    Bean counter: "Brilliant!"

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  12. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by Walkingshark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow. I'm lazy, I just blindly click the page and mash the keyboard now and then. I don't even speak English, I'm just very, very improbable.

    --
    The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
  13. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    You and your infinite improbability keyboard!

  14. Re:Shenanigans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    then yeah they're just milking their fan base.

    ...*sigh*

  15. Re:Zeratul by linear+a · · Score: 2, Funny

    C'mon. Get on the rant train dude. We all have an inalienable right to get as much gameplay as Blizzard can come up with for the price of a single game. Sounds like they wrote 3 games worth of entertainment. Those bastards.