Slashdot Mirror


Starcraft 2 To Be a Trilogy

The Starcraft 2 gameplay panel was an eventful one at Blizzcon today. The developers faced an obstacle when designing the game; the plans they had were just too massive to implement in a single game on anything approaching a reasonable timeline. Their solution was to divide the game up into three separate, stand-alone titles: Terran: Wings of Libery, Zerg: Heart of the Swarm, and Protoss: Legacy of the Void. Read on for further details. Each campaign will have on the order of 26-30 missions. The path players take through the missions can vary — the storyline branches frequently — but they will end in the same place. The games will run alongside each other; there will not be cliffhanger endings leading from one to another, and each game will focus on a different part of the story. The Terran campaign will focus on Jim Raynor, and the Zerg campaign will be all about Kerrigan. Multiplayer functionality will be in place for all three races from the start.

6 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Allow me to translate... by lowlymarine · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We at Blizzard Entertainment value you, the wallet mounted on the back of an entranced magpie. As such, we wanted to ensure that StarCraft 2 was the highest quality money sink possible, while still extracting money from you soon. As such, it will be released in installments for the low, low price of $59.99 each. Naturally, each new installment will break multiplayer with previous ones. We hope you enjoy playing our games as much as we enjoy taking your money!"

  2. Effing brilliant by rk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those jackholes are going to make me shell out 150 to 200 dollars for this game, aren't they?

    God, Blizzard is evil!

  3. Re:Am I the only one? by Toonol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps you should have taken a moment to confirm that indeed, every other post in the thread says the exact same thing.

    Including this one; their stated reason is untrue, this is a marketing ploy to sell more units.

  4. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by Gewalt · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've gone from RTFA to RTFS, now.

    Do people on /. actually read anything?

    I read your comment. I can has cookie?

    --
    Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
  5. Victim of WoW's success by Stickerboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the conversation now at Blizzard's headquarters:

    Bean counter: "Hey, we're making money hand over fist with World of Warcraft! How can you justify diverting money into an expensive new project without subscriptions?"
    Developer: "We could put subscriptions into multiplayer."
    Bean counter: "No, that could take away from our golden cash cow."
    Developer: "We... could split the single player into three map packs and charge for all three?"
    Bean counter: "Won't consumers feel gipped? Could that cut into sales?"
    Developer: "We'll add more 'mine X resource, build Y units and rush the enemy base' missions to fluff it out. Total gameplay hours will be 3 times as long!"
    Bean counter: "Brilliant!"

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  6. Re:Speaking of Multiplayer by Walkingshark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow. I'm lazy, I just blindly click the page and mash the keyboard now and then. I don't even speak English, I'm just very, very improbable.

    --
    The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.