Slashdot Mirror


Open Office Plans To Party Like It's Version 3.0

penguin_dance writes "The Register reports that 'OpenOffice.org is throwing a launch party in Paris on 13 October' to celebrate eight years, and hopefully announce the release of version 3.0. Some notes: [OpenOffice.org 3.0] will support the OpenDocument Format 1.2 standard, and be able to open files created by MS Office 2007 and Office 2008 for Mac OS X." As maj_id10t notes, though the OO.o site does not yet carry an announcement, "Lifehacker has posted an entry stating the final release of OpenOffice 3.0 is available for download via their distribution mirrors."

27 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Re:3.0? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, I recently tried the release candidate for the OS X Aqua version. It's horribly ugly (just like on other platforms), but it does seem to work.

    Yup. And since Microsoft has dropped the only compelling feature that set Office for Mac apart from other office suites (VBA macros) and STILL hasn't made Entourage into a first-class Exchange client, OpenOffice 3 is now just as good (though not quite as good looking). Grats, OO.o team; adios, billg.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  2. Kerning by default by Noksagt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Doesn't Word have kerning disabled by default? What do you recommend to people now? LaTeX?

    1. Re:Kerning by default by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Informative

      the hell are you talking about? i'm still running OO.org 2.3.1 and it supports kerning just as Word does.

      maybe you should stop using a fixed-width font like Courier/Fixedsys?

    2. Re:Kerning by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Kerning is not just using different widths for different charachteers, it's about using different widths for different pairs of characters, i.e. moving small lower case characters a bit under an uppercase "T" so that the white space between them looks about the same as the space between e.g. an "M" and a "i".

  3. Re:Openoffice? no thanks. by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Informative

    What exactly were you missing? My two major gripes with OpenOffice were poor implementations of comments and tracking changes in Writer, and those are fixed now.

  4. Re:I would like to see a feature list. by Scutter · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would love to see a feature list.

    Took all of three seconds to go to the website and get it.

    http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/featurelistbeta.html

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  5. Re:PowerPC? by drfireman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The PPC version is hidden away with one of the openoffice "Projects" -- click on the projects tab, and then you're on your own, but eventually you get to an ftp site. I've found it to be very stable in light use (I mostly use the Linux version).

  6. Re:3.0? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe they're adding VBA back next version. And if you want something native, Apple has iWork (Pages, Numbers, Keynote)

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. Re:Openoffice? no thanks. by Noksagt · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can use PowerPoint templates from within Impress and you can download many more from oooextras and OO.o does have animations.

    OO.o Calc has had some pitfalls, but version 3 is much improved. With several well-documented numerical errors that have survived in each new version of Excel, I don't know if that is the paragon to strive for.

  8. Re:Sure. by hobdes · · Score: 4, Informative
    Apparently it does autokern:

    Miscellaneous Features

    • Autokerning Enabled by Default
  9. Re:I would like to see a feature list. by settantta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Feature list is available here

    Release notes are here

  10. It was just too slow for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I tried it back in 2004, and the thing that struck me most about it (besides the fact that it was free) was the speed. It took FOREVER to open and save. I was in a phase when I was trying to move over to as much open source software as possible to save money, but OpenOffice just ended up frustrating me. Also, I recall fighting against the program to do simple things in spreadsheets.

    I use and love Gnumeric now for spreadsheets, but I resolved that I'd rather pay for MSOffice. It isn't perfect, but I was willing to pay.

    I was always so confused about it too, because my initial exposure to open source taught me to expect this kind of software to, as a rule, always be leaner, smaller, cleaner and faster than "bloated" MS products, but I walked away from OO feeling IT was more bloated.

  11. Re:Openoffice? no thanks. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

    It sounds like you should have tried Oxygenoffice instead of Openoffice,as it comes with a lot more with regards to templates and such out of the box. Of course it takes them a little while after the latest Open Office release,so why not bookmark tham and check it out in a month or so when version 3 comes out?

    That said I don't really think OO.o is really for the "power users" of MSO,because they get more use out of the little features that a good 85% of the public probably doesn't even know is there. Where I have had luck switching folks is the basic home users,where they are just writing docs,working up some basic spreadsheets,and maybe cooking up a contact list database. They,along with my older users who can't stand the stupid ribbon seem to have no problem making the switch to OO.o.

    I have personally always been a believer in the right tool for the job. Since I have a copy of MSOffice 2K I picked up several years ago for cheap at the shop I worked at that is what I primarily use. But for my home users it would simply be stupid to spend even $100 on the student/home edition of MSOffice when OO.o does everything they'd use an office suite for for free. I also like how I can whip out a copy of OO.o 1.5 for those folks around here that are still using older machines and give them an office suite that doesn't slow their machine to a crawl. Both MSOffice and Open Office seem to be getting a lot more bloated IMHO. But if only MSOffice gets the job done for you please stick with it and enjoy. But even as a MSOffice user I'm sure you'd agree having choice in the matter is a good thing.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  12. KOffice2 will be coming soon by BhaKi · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might want to try out KOffice2 which is going to be released in a few months.

    --
    The largest prime factor of my UID is 263267.
  13. Re:pdf saving and editing by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Version 3 has the ability to edit pdf - that could be a killer feature.

    Why? PDFs are useful for distributing material in a reliable way. They have never been designed to be an easily editable format, other than for forms and the like perhaps, and it would be crazy to start treating them as such.

    Also, in case you didn't realise, PDF export from Word is available as a freebie plug-in from MS in Word 2007, and it doesn't have all the font bugs OO Writer has! (See my earlier posts in this discussion for details.)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  14. Re:Openoffice? no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is the same attitude that's been holding Linux back for years. Blaming the user because something doesn't work like they want it to may make you feel better but it does nothing to improve the adoption rate nor strengthen the user base. I agree with your claims but your attitude does nothing to improve the situation.

  15. Re:pdf saving and editing by EreIamJH · · Score: 2, Informative

    [PDFs] have never been designed to be an easily editable format, other than for forms and the like perhaps, and it would be crazy to start treating them as such.

    Forms are exactly what I had in mind. In the last week I've used Openoffice to fill in a pdf criminal records check form and an thirteen (!!) page professional license application form.

  16. Re:3.0? by Drencrom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Meh. I use Keynote as my main presentation software, but I am thinking of switching back to PPT. It is very easy to use, and looks great, but when you're going to a conference, you end up exporting to PPT anyway, and then you have to edit that PPT in Powerpoint to fix all the things that didn't make the jump. It's wonderful if you're sure that your laptop is going to work perfectly.

    Have you tried exporting to PDF? Unless you have some fancy animations is the best way to have a portable persentation. Almost every pdf viewer has a full screen mode for presentations.

  17. Re:Looking forward to 3.0 by onefriedrice · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've never seen those problems with Office, nor have I ever heard of anyone else having those problems... Weird.

    --
    This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
  18. OpenType Fonts by OverZealous.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a Mac user, I'm excited to finally be dumping NeoOffice. I hate the system-deep installer. With OO.o v3, it's a proper single-directory bundle. Installation is just drag-and-drop. And no more random boat - the OO.o icon is slick and looks great in the dock.

    My biggest complaint with OO.o (and I use it exclusively now, and have moved over my parents from MS Office with no issues) is a frustrating bug with OpenType fonts. They always render fine, but exporting to PDF (something I do often) converts them to some other random font.

    Looks like it will be fixed, but not until 3.2 — which feels like forever, since this has been an issue for a very long time. It's especially frustrating since some of the best free fonts out there are OTF fonts.

    If you to help increase the visibility of this bug, please vote for Bug #43029.

  19. Re:Font Embedding in PDFs by baileydau · · Score: 2, Informative

    I waited for rectangular cut and paste for about 3 years.

    Version 3.2 isn't far away.

    It will happen.

    Do you mean block selection mode?

    In OO 2.4 you can find it under Edit -> Selection Mode -> Block Area
    Or you can use Alt + Shift + F8

    --
    Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
  20. Re:Openoffice? no thanks. by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it's not. Some times, you just have to recognise that some people are full of shit, and fullgandoo is definitely one of them.

  21. Re:3.0? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's like the difference between The Gimp and Pixelmator.

    Both do image editing (and in this case The Gimp is a more powerful tool) but Pixelmator fits in with the look and feel of OS X and works extremely well with other Mac apps. In fact look at the two websites - The Gimp's site looks like crap. Having used both to some degree and not needing the full power of The Gimp, I dumped it for Pixelmator a long time back. The UI is unbelievably far ahead of The Gimp.

    If you're going to use an app for any length of time, it should be as comfortable as possible. This is obvious for cars, for furniture, for workplaces but somehow it's a debated point for software applications. Aesthetics are important, and for some reason Mac users care a lot about the concept.

    That's a long answer to your somewhat troll-y question, but there it is. Mac users can certainly use apps that work on Linux and Windows, we just choose not to if something more usable exists.

  22. Re:3.0? by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Informative

    tables! Now I remember! Tables have driven me nuts with Openoffice. I had a table at the end of my page, and inserted a newline. There was no way to remove the newline without the table. For some reason they got fixed together for ever and always. That and getting the background color of a table cell took me a long time. The old granddaddy of tables is also not perfect: I did have MS Office crash on me last week just removing a table row! The equation editor of OO is excellent however. MS really messed up that one, especially if you are using different office versions at some point, and the equations may or may not show up... Overall, Openoffice is ready for light to normal use at the moment, much more so than two years ago, and will probably surpass MS office in usability and stability in the not to distant future.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  23. Re:Using OpenOffice with no problems?! by linhares · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use British spelling, you insensitive, ignorant, grammar nazi, clod.

  24. Re:3.0? by lordholm · · Score: 2, Informative

    If your CD is damaged, you could install the Keynote Demo (http://www.apple.com/iwork/trial/) and just type in your license key...

    This assumes that you where using the latest Keynote, but it is probably possible to get a demo for an old release somewhere.

    --
    "Civis Europaeus sum!"
  25. Re:Always felt a bit clunky to me oh and a questio by kimvette · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out Scribus -- it's a F/OSS desktop publishing program. From the Scribus web site:

    Scribus is an open-source program that brings award-winning professional page layout to Linux/Unix, MacOS X, OS/2 and Windows desktops with a combination of "press-ready" output and new approaches to page layout. Underneath the modern and user friendly interface, Scribus supports professional publishing features, such as CMYK color, separations, ICC color management and versatile PDF creation.

    However, a major essential feature it's missing is import filters to migrate away from other publishing programs - especially that crap Microsoft Publisher so many people have locked themselves into. However, there are free services to convert the files to free oneself from the grip of Microsoft Publisher.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50