Slashdot Mirror
OpenOffice.org 3.0 Is Officially Here
SNate writes "After a grinding three-year development cycle, the OpenOffice.org team has finally squeezed out a new release. New features include support for the controversial Microsoft OOXML file format, multi-page views in Writer, and PDF import via an extension. Linux Format has an overview of the new release, asking the question: is it really worth the 3.0 label?"
You obviously don't know anything about the 60's. At the time, people under 40 mostly supported the Weathermen, because they knew then that their government did not represent them and was in the employ of the military industrial complex. And he was not a "terrorist" -- he was a revolutionary. There is a difference. Washington was a revolutionary. The difference between them is that Washington won. As for your analysis as proof. Are your really that stupid? Yes, yes, you are.
You're all crazy, and clearly high on 'herbal' products and noodle sauce. Keep it up!
Help feed homeless animals - Free! www.theanimalrescuesite.com
yes there are times, where you use your foot, to move the foot shaped ball.
It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
America was founded by terrorist. If you hate terrorists then you should be fighting for control of the US to go back to Britain.
Okay, hang on. I love Obama, not just for his politics but for the kind of person he is, and I think slandering his character due to his association with Bill Ayers is a joke at best, but he was a terrorist. He blew up buildings, statues, whatever, in an attempt to use terror to get attention to his message. That does not compare against Washington, who led armies against armies. We were in the midst of a formally declared war between nations fought by armies.
If it makes you feel better to call Ayers a "revolutionary", then fine. His only casualties, from what I've read, were members of his own group through an accident while building bombs. Having said that, in my book, he was a domestic terrorist, just an atypically innocuous one.
*** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
Most people under 40 did NOT support the Weathermen! Your statement is monumentally wrong. You could say that most people in Berkeley, or Bloomington, or Ann Arbor supported the SDS, maybe . . . .
But the Weathermen? Never. The Weathermen were plain violent hypocrites.
And that's why they was rioting in the streets and massive demonstrations against the government. http://uktv.co.uk/history/item/aid/570636 How were they "hypocrites"?
I am holding on. I guess we differ on the definition. The British considered Washington a 'rebel' and today would call him a "terrorist" for sure, you cannot argue with that.
I could, but I'd rather argue against this:
Here is the CIA definition: Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f(d): * The term 'terrorism' means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents. *
Washington did not attack "noncombatant targets," nor did he employ, "the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion." (Merriam-Webster). Ayers did.
To keep this short (got work to do), Ayers doesn't fit the CIA definition, but he does fit the Merriam-Webster one. As for the U.S. being a terrorist state... that's a whole 'nother discussion, and one I'm not inclined to agree with you on, for the most part. (Iraq, on the other hand...)
Gary, it was nice chatting with you.
*** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***