Now Even Photo CAPTCHAs Have Been Cracked
MoonUnit writes "Technology Review has an interesting article about the way CAPTCHAS are fueling AI research. Following recent news about various textual CAPTCHAs being cracked, the article notes that a researcher at Palo Alto Research Center has now found a way crack photo-based CAPTCHAs too. Most approaches are based on statistical learning, however, so Luis von Ahn (one of the inventors of the CAPTCHA) says it is usually possible to make a CAPTCHA more difficult to break by making a few simple changes."
They're already hard to read. Why do I feel that soon I wont be able to read ANY of them!?
PS: I don't reply to ACs.
Instead of asking someone to type in the letters, numbers or how many cats there are in the photo, just randomly generate some scenario:
"Jim and Sue go to the park on Sunday. Billy the dog goes too."
Then you can ask random questions like:
"What is the name of the dog?"
"What day did they go to the park?"
"Where did they go?"
That might work OK for a while...
Summation 2
Or better yet, after a dozen tries at the captcha allow entry into the site because obviously if it was a script trying to break the captcha it would have been successful by then.
try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
CAPTCHA is not a security feature. It's a way to help avoid robots pretending to be humans. Anyone using it as a security feature is just giving more reasons for people to find ways to break them. All in all, it's time to get rid of CAPTCHA and move on to some more logical system that would be more difficult, such as a system where users are asked to answer a simple question that contains the answer, such as: If you were born in 1973 and JFK was shot in 1961, were you alive when he was shot? How many liters of water fit into a five-liter bottle?
It sounds like a great idea, but I've met plenty of people who wouldn't be able to answer either of your questions. To steal a random quote from the internet:
"Back in the 1980s, Yosemite National Park was having a serious problem with bears: They would wander into campgrounds and break into the garbage bins. This put both bears and people at risk. So the Park Service started installing armored garbage cans that were tricky to open -- you had to swing a latch, align two bits of handle, that sort of thing. But it turns out it's actually quite tricky to get the design of these cans just right. Make it too complex and people can't get them open to put away their garbage in the first place. Said one park ranger, "There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists."
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
> If you were born in 1973 and JFK was shot in 1961, were you alive when he was shot?
I have developed a device that answers random yes/no questions correctly 50% of the time. Me and my flip-a-coin-bot will take over the world!
You can even take this approach one step further and use CSS to move the field outside the viewable range of the page or set its visible property to false so the user won't even see it.
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
Well, I think we have a capcha to prove someone is a lawyer.
you're pitting a machine generating questions and answers against a machine designed to answer questions.
You make it sound like that's hard. Here's a question that a machine could generate that another machine could not answer:
"What number am I thinking of?"
It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.