Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Firefox Alpha 1 Released

An anonymous reader writes "Today Mozilla released development builds of its next mobile browser, Fennec 1.0 Alpha 1. 'The last eight milestones were building up to getting a stable browser with an easy to use interface. We really want to get Fennec in front of as many people as possible and get feedback.' To that end, Fennec has been made available for the desktop on Windows, Mac and Linux."

148 comments

  1. OS X Intel Only by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Informative

    The OS X version is Intel only. This probably won't affect most of you, but it does kinda suck for those of us still on PPC machines.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:OS X Intel Only by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It especially sucks if you're waiting for the Mac mini update. It's been over a year now, and the last update was a simple CPU speed bump.

    2. Re:OS X Intel Only by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It especially sucks if you're waiting for the Mac mini update. It's been over a year now, and the last update was a simple CPU speed bump.

      The white Macbook is $50 more than the faster Mini. Not bad for a screen and UPS.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:OS X Intel Only by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      White MacBook: 1149$ CAD
      2GHz Mac mini: 849$ CAD

      Looks more like a 300$ difference to me.

    4. Re:OS X Intel Only by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Why would you think I was talking about Canadian pricing?

      2GHZ Mini with a keyboard and mouse is $897.00. I had selected the larger hard drive before, but I see now that's not applicable to the white Macbook. So it's really $100 more (USD).

      Easily worth it for the built-in UPS unless you're heavily space constrained.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:OS X Intel Only by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If I was a Intel only Mac users, I would still watch companies and gigantic open source organisations release system requirements.

      Do they claim to race with Adobe Flash like MS does but ship Intel only Mac products like Silverlight 2? Pass. They aren't serious. Is the game Intel only while it doesn't need that CPU speed in fact? It is a Windows game, pass.

      The reason I bought Graphic Converter and Vuescan to my G5 Apple back in 2003 was basically seeing those single coders were still supporting OS 9 and not abandoning their users. Not like I could even boot to OS 9 even if I wanted to.

  2. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by Dolda2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed, that's exactly what the summary said. They made it "available for the desktop", "to get Fennec in front of as many people as possible".

  3. Re:I'm impressed by Dolda2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, I take that back. My bad. I read that "Mozilla Firefox", rather that "Mobile Firefox", as it actually said. It might still be arguable that "Mobile Gecko" would be a lot more accurate, though.

  4. Re:Apple users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I honestly expected the anti-Firefox trolls to crawl out from under their bridges, but who woke you?

  5. Re:I'm impressed by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'Fennec' is a small fox with big ears. For extra geek cred it's nocturnal. It's not cute enough for a mascot by a long ways, but it does sort of fit.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  6. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, those aren't mobile platforms. But if you'd read the page, you'd see that they're making these available to help get the widest number of users to provide feedback re: the interface, as well as making it available for people to begin developing plugins for it. Of course, that will probably also lower the S/N ratio re: valid feedback.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  7. Mobile browser for desktop OS?! by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm really interested in trying Fennec on my actual mobile device. Oh well, I'm glad to see they're making progress.

    1. Re:Mobile browser for desktop OS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fennec A1 is available for the Nokia N800/N810 internet tablet. The desktop versions are merely for those people who don't have a targeted mobile device, but want to see the browser

    2. Re:Mobile browser for desktop OS?! by felipekk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or developers. From the blog entry:

      "That's right, you can install Fennec on your Windows, OS X or Linux desktop too! We want you to be able to experiment, provide feedback, write add-ons and generally get involved with the Mozilla Mobile project, even if you don't have a device."

  8. Re:I'm impressed by humina · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Classic Slashdot: You did not read the article. The webpage is plastered with the word fennec because...that's what it's called. And you got modded up to 4 which means the moderators did not read the article.

    --
    check out the best blog ever:
    http://oehlberg.com
  9. iphone by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a version for the iPhone, although I'm sure Apple would never let it see the light of day.

    1. Re:iphone by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about a version that only works at night then?

    2. Re:iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke's on you: software can't even "see."

    3. Re:iphone by Tiles · · Score: 1

      Well, the fennec is nocturnal...

    4. Re:iphone by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      That's an understatement, Apple could do with the competition. Whilst Safari is the best mobile browser at the moment it is extremely crash happy. More so on the 2.1 update.

      I average 2 Safari crashes a day on my iphone.

    5. Re:iphone by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a version for the iPhone, although I'm sure Apple would never let it see the light of day.

      It's expressly forbidden by the terms of the iPhone SDK license.

      Here's a nickel, kid, get a real platform.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:iphone by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      my PSP has got you beat. i get out of memory errors every 10-15 minutes. and you have to restart the entire PSP to continue browsing normally. if you go to a resource intensive site it runs out of memory even faster.

      i don't know if they fixed this problem on the PSP slim with the memory upgrade, but even a PSP fat ought to be able to surf the web adequately by paging memory to the memory stick. but Sony seems to care more about shutting down PSP homebrew than fixing the PSP's software or actually putting out firmware updates that add value to the PSP. ironically, if there's any chance of a decent browser being developed for the PSP fat, it'll be from the homebrew community.

      it would be awesome to be able to run Fennec on the PSP, but seeing as it's being targeted at a system with 4 times the RAM that the PSP-1000 has (the Nokia N800 has 128MB of RAM), it's probably not likely to happen.

    7. Re:iphone by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Why does something need to see to only work at night? Never heard of a clock huh...

    8. Re:iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The joke's on you: software can't even "see.""

      Sure it can, all it needs is a photoresistor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoresistor).

    9. Re:iphone by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How about a version that only works at night then?

      Geez guys, just put tape over the ambient light sensor.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:iphone by fr4nk · · Score: 1

      I live on the north pole, you insensitive clod!

    11. Re:iphone by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      By buying iPhone you agreed that you will only use Apple browser and Apple approved software on device.

      Even on poor orphan Symbian UIQ3, I have 4 browsers to select from.

      What we don't need is Mozilla or Opera people spending that time to that locked device (I reject to call it smartphone) while Symbian and Windows mobile, Linux certainly needs a better browser.

  10. slashdot brings down another blog by shareme · · Score: 0

    Slashdot traffic again brings down another blog.. For our next trick can we try the whitehouse.gov website?

    --
    Fred Grott(aka shareme) http://mobilebytes.wordpress.com
    1. Re:slashdot brings down another blog by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

      Full Fennec details here : http://www.whitehouse.gov/

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  11. Dead by Mehetabelo · · Score: 2, Informative

    And, in classic slashdot style, the site is dead before I make it there.

    1. Re:Dead by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

      WFM

      --
      Reply to That ||
  12. Re:I'm impressed by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot | Mobile Firefox Alpha 1 Released - Mozilla Firefox

    Dude... the " - Mozilla Firefox" at the end is because that's what you're using... :P

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  13. Re:Apple users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They sleep under the same bridge. Give him a break. He's a little groggy and couldn't bother to read the headline.

  14. More Standard compliant? by Skifreemonster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fennec scores higher on the Acid3 test than Firefox 3.0.3. Well at least running on a windows PC

    1. Re:More Standard compliant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does score 89/100 because it's using the gecko 1.9.1 trunk builds, while Firefox 3.0.x is on teh 1.9.0 branch.
      The Firefox trunk nightly builds currently score 93/100 by the way.

    2. Re:More Standard compliant? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 5, Informative

      And Firefox 3.1 nightlies score better than that, around 93/94 if I recall correctly. Fennec is running nightly versions of Gecko.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    3. Re:More Standard compliant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also uses 50mb of ram. Not suitable for a phone.

    4. Re:More Standard compliant? by nneonneo · · Score: 1

      There is a development build scoring 97/100 using patches that are now available on Bugzilla; AFAIK the 3 remaining problems are for missing SVG font support. See this comment for more information.

  15. Do or will plugins eventually work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are the firefox plugins going to work for fennec ?

    It would be great if adblock plus would work !

    1. Re:Do or will plugins eventually work ? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      No, what would be really great would be a browser with Flash. Yes, ad-block is great, but most modern OSes (and mobile ones if you hack them enough) have a hosts file that can be configured to block ads. But without Flash you take a way a good portion of the web.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Do or will plugins eventually work ? by DarthJohn · · Score: 1

      No, what would be really great would be a browser with Flash. Yes, ad-block is great, but most modern OSes (and mobile ones if you hack them enough) have a hosts file that can be configured to block ads. But without Flash you take a way a good portion of the web.

      No, what would be unfortunately necessary would be a browser with Flash. Yes, ad-block is great and I want it too, but am not sure about it downloading updates for filters. Without Flash you take away an evil portion of the web.

  16. Re:I'm impressed by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not cute enough for a mascot by a long ways, but it does sort of fit.

    How is this NOT adorable?

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  17. Firefennec? by argent · · Score: 1

    Or is Fennec solar powered? That would explain the ears.

    1. Re:Firefennec? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, Fennec is a (small) species of fox that has large ears

    2. Re:Firefennec? by argent · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know. Obviously being too indirect today. My Andres Serrano reference in the Little Big Planet missed too.

  18. Slow as balls on the N800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Installed Fennec onto my N800 (OS2008). Slow as hell. I didn't think anything could be slower than MicroB, but they've done it. Plus you can't trigger the text input fields, I'm assuming they think everyone has an N810 with the built in keyboard.

    Can't load gmail (which they even do in their example video). Sits and spins, and pops up a warning saying that a script is making Fennec unresponsive. Oh well.

    Having said that, if you can get it to actually load and render a page, it does it really fast.

  19. Re:I'm impressed by Firehed · · Score: 4, Funny

    A sleeping mascot? Goes great with the speed of mobile data connections I guess.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  20. One problem - selecting page name. by argent · · Score: 1

    Switching between the name and title when you edit the name/title widget is nice, but it means if you want to copy the name of the page you won't be able to select it.

  21. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Linux is a kernel, retard.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  22. Second problem - no proxy settings? by argent · · Score: 1

    At least I couldn't find them in the preferences page.

    1. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      This is rather important. Sure, phones don't often use proxies, but netbooks and wifi-enabled PDAs might.

    2. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by argent · · Score: 1

      Oh yes... when I had an iPaq with wifi, I definitely needed proxy support. And some phones use wifi for cheaper access or higher speeds.

    3. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by guest · · Score: 1

      There are proxy settings but they're hidden in about:config.

      Set network.proxy.type to 1 and then set network.proxy.http to whatever IP address you prefer and set network.proxy.http_port to the port number. They may choose to keep these settings hidden, as most people probably won't need them, so long as they keep these settings available in about:config, those users that need them will be able to use them.

      --
      pw:secret
    4. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by argent · · Score: 1

      And if that's not good enough you can just edit user.js directly, right?

    5. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or change the source code and compile. Your sarcasm is misplaced here, unless you are an iphone user.

    6. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by guest · · Score: 1

      I know, I know. In Mozilla's defense, though, they do provide you with an interface to make the change (even if it's not quite user friendly), and because of limited real estate they have to keep the number of preferences to a minimum. I'm not a fanboy (see my criticism below of their removal of the forward/back buttons from the interface), I just understand their reasoning in this case. It's not too onerous to open up "about:config" type "proxy" and googling the results if it's not obvoius.

      --
      pw:secret
    7. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by argent · · Score: 1

      My sarcasm is never misplaced. Misunderstood, perhaps, but not misplaced.

    8. Re:Second problem - no proxy settings? by argent · · Score: 1

      It's not too onerous to open up "about:config" type "proxy" and googling the results if it's not obvoius.

      Yeh, it is.

      It's almost too onerous to have to change the proxy settings through a preferences tab. For a mobile device, you should be able to have proxy settings (and possibly other settings) based on SSID or network address, so it just works.

  23. Minimo2 by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm curious to see how this performs on a real mobile device compared to Minimo. Wikipedia seems to indicate it's being pushed by the same developer, Doug Turner. I was never able to get even runnable performance out of Minimo, but there's definitely a market for a better mobile browser. I just updated my Q9m to WM 6.1 and Pocket IE is still garbage. The other alternatives like Skyfire & Iris show potential, but they are not there yet.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Minimo2 by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm curious to see how this performs on a real mobile device compared to Minimo. Wikipedia seems to indicate it's being pushed by the same developer, Doug Turner. I was never able to get even runnable performance out of Minimo, but there's definitely a market for a better mobile browser. I just updated my Q9m to WM 6.1 and Pocket IE is still garbage. The other alternatives like Skyfire & Iris show potential, but they are not there yet.

      Opera Mobile's not a bad browser at all.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Minimo2 by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      On my old HP iPaq Minimo crashed a lot. On my Samsung Blackjack it crashed a lot. I haven't tried it on WM6 yet, but I have a feeling Minimo will go in the same pattern.

      Not like I use it for anything heavy, all I do is read /. on it and bash quotes.

      However, I'll be sure to try Fennec.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    3. Re:Minimo2 by repvik · · Score: 1

      Opera Mobile is pretty nice (albeit not entirely free).
      Safari on the iPhone is also pretty good, except it crashes at random points all over.

    4. Re:Minimo2 by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      entirely free ?
      It's not free at all, in any way.

    5. Re:Minimo2 by Microlith · · Score: 1

      It's not free at all, in any way.

      Indeed, but it's best in class. Sometimes good things are worth the money.

    6. Re:Minimo2 by afidel · · Score: 1

      Have you tried opera mini? On the Blackberry it's definitely better than the OS4 browser.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Minimo2 by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Don't forget microb (mozilla build for maemo).

    8. Re:Minimo2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The webkit based browser that comes with some Nokia phones (N95/96 at least) isn't bad either, not as fast as Opera Mobile, but some pages render better. Does anyone know if it has a name?

    9. Re:Minimo2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't tried Opera on Palm...

    10. Re:Minimo2 by mj01nir · · Score: 1

      Opera Mini is free-as-in-beer. Gratis, but not libre.

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    11. Re:Minimo2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera Mobile's not a bad browser at all.

      Opera mobile 8 is not bad at all. Opera mobile 9 is a huge step backward. Still beats the crap out of IE, but it just doesn't render the pages as readable as 8 used to. At least it doesn't in my ipaq.

    12. Re:Minimo2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skyfire has YouTube video support. You can also watch live streaming NFL football ... pretty slick.

    13. Re:Minimo2 by thetartanavenger · · Score: 1

      I liked opera mobile back when I gave it a test and I would use it if it weren't for one thing, no mouse cursor. Because of this I frequently found links that I just could not get at no matter what combination of directions I tried to get at them.

      I didn't think I'd like having a mouse cursor on my mobile, but the integrated browser has one and it actually makes life so much easier when trying to get at some links. The scrolling around does get a little repetitive with having to click constantly to get the cursor to move, or press and hold and overshoot, but it's a big step up from not being able to get at links.

      --
      Who need's speling and grammar?
    14. Re:Minimo2 by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      I'll have to say that I think Opera rocks on Windows Mobile devices. Unfortunately, the only problem I hit frequently is a lack of memory when loading desktop web pages.

      That's a flaw of my device, not of Opera... but still, it's annoying :)

      I plan to tackle this just as soon as AT&T gets their finger out and releases the Fuze... :D

    15. Re:Minimo2 by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Opera Mobile 9.5 is free of charge.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    16. Re:Minimo2 by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Opera Mobile 9.5 is so much better than v8 it's ridiculous. It renders pages much better. No wonder, since 9.5 is using the latest engine with lots of compatibility fixes since the outdated v8.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  24. The usual problem with Linux binaries by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    And of course a RHEL4 desktop won't run it, wrong glibc version. When will people learn, either package it properly for a small set of distros or static link everything like netscape used to do.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:The usual problem with Linux binaries by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      When will people learn, either package it properly for a small set of distros or static link everything like netscape used to do.

      There probably aren't many people running an outdated desktop linux disto who want to try out new alpha web browsers.

      One would assume you could recompile it, no?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:The usual problem with Linux binaries by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > There probably aren't many people running an outdated desktop linux disto
      > who want to try out new alpha web browsers.

      Not a good assumption. There are good arguments for a STABLE load on a machine you depend on. For example, I have tried updating that machine to Fedora 9 but I get subtle file corruption when reading files on the RAID array.

      But the bigger point is I'm sure I;m not alone in tiring of this attitude that if you aren't running sid or rawhide you can't be a developer. You should only be running those if you are developing packages destined for inclusion in a distro downstream from one of those.

      And this Windows Treadmill attitude is widespread. Flash 10 just came out. So of course Flash 9 disappeared from Adobe's yum repo. So now if you are running RHEL3 or RHEL4 you are SOL, everything has to be upgraded all the time. When the hell does any actual work get done during this continual update, debug, repeat cycle?

      And debug is the word here. Has anyone actually done a distro upgrade on a heavily used and customized (lots of out of distro source packages carefully ported in, built and installed, stuff just installed via make install, etc), machine that didn't lose a few days productivity? Not to mention learning to cope with the ever higher levels of braindamage in GNOME an upgrade brings.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:The usual problem with Linux binaries by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Has anyone actually done a distro upgrade on a heavily used and customized (lots of out of distro source packages carefully ported in, built and installed, stuff just installed via make install, etc), machine that didn't lose a few days productivity?

      Updating debian has always been smooth as silk for me.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:The usual problem with Linux binaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're running RHEL4 on your iPhone? You know this browser isn't for desktops right?

    5. Re:The usual problem with Linux binaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, yes it is. At least, that's what's been released - desktop versions for testing purposes

    6. Re:The usual problem with Linux binaries by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Not a good assumption. There are good arguments for a STABLE load on a machine you depend on. For example, I have tried updating that machine to Fedora 9 but I get subtle file corruption when reading files on the RAID array.

      Hrm, that's definitely a bug to file. But that aside, you're on RHEL4 but RHEL5 as been out for a year and a half - that's a stable load as well.

      But the bigger point is I'm sure I;m not alone in tiring of this attitude that if you aren't running sid or rawhide you can't be a developer. You should only be running those if you are developing packages destined for inclusion in a distro downstream from one of those.

      Yeah, but I think it's a matter of resources. I don't know how they staff their builds, but at an alpha 1 they probably don't have a wide a binary build system as they would at release, and they nearly always include source so folks with more rare distros can contribute builds. I do find many developers running edge releases, or simply source-based releases like gentoo, but I'm ignorant about what the actual distribution is.

      And this Windows Treadmill attitude is widespread. Flash 10 just came out. So of course Flash 9 disappeared from Adobe's yum repo. So now if you are running RHEL3 or RHEL4 you are SOL, everything has to be upgraded all the time. When the hell does any actual work get done during this continual update, debug, repeat cycle?

      That's a good question. I've written on my blog before, after talking to one of the head Fedora guys, is that the package maintainers very rarely write upgrade scripts for their products. PostgreSQL is one that bites me more often than not, as an example. I think they'd really love if all 9000 or whatever packages knew how to do clean upgrades, but as you mention the attitude is pervasive. And the sad part is the total work required of the community is much higher if everybody has to do manual upgrades and conversions than if the package developers provided an upgrade script. But again, they chose between adding features and writing upgrade scripts and rarely fall on the side of such scripts. My gut says, though, that if they did the scripts their communities would grow to the point where they'd have both.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  25. Article already Slashdotted by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    The linked article is already Slashdotted due to "exceeding bandwidth" or some such thing. No surprise there as it's a blog.

    Going to the official Firefox site and searching for "fennec" matched nothing. Yea! With it being so easy to get, I'll be trying it "real soon now".

    1. Re:Article already Slashdotted by jDeepbeep · · Score: 3, Informative

      Going to the official Firefox site and searching for "fennec" matched nothing. Yea! With it being so easy to get, I'll be trying it "real soon now".

      https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/FennecVision

      --
      Reply to That ||
    2. Re:Article already Slashdotted by jDeepbeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      Going to the official Firefox site and searching for "fennec" matched nothing. Yea! With it being so easy to get, I'll be trying it "real soon now".

      https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/FennecVision

      Here's the actual FTP links http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mobile/fennec-1.0a1.en-US.win32.zip http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mobile/fennec-1.0a1.en-US.mac.dmg http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mobile/fennec-1.0a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2

      --
      Reply to That ||
    3. Re:Article already Slashdotted by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Informative

      After some poking around and a bit of google-fu I found this: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/ which has all the builds. There's also instructions in installing it on a Nokia N810 here.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  26. Re:I'm impressed by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Ohhhhh, okay. That explains it. I was wondering why all the stories around here seem to be talking about Mozilla Firefox.

  27. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An African fox with large ears... Sort of like Obama, eh?

  28. Re:I'm impressed by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points for ya buddy. ROFL

    --
    Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  29. Re:I'm impressed by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    He wasn't talking about Fennec in the webpage, he was talking about Firefox in the title. The title should have been "Mozilla releases Fennec 1.0 Alpha 1", or alternatively "Mozilla releases mobile browser based on Firefox". Also, it's impossible to RTFA now, the site has been slashdotted.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  30. Fennec, Chrome, Desktop, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So let me get this straight. I'd like Chrome (beta) for the desktop on Linux and OSX and can't get it, but I can get Fennec (alpha), a mobile browser, running on my desktop w/ Linux and OSX.

  31. Posting from Fennec in Windows by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So far it seems pretty interesting, although there's definitely bugs (eg. my text disappears when I'm not typing a character), but hey it's an alpha. I'm looking forward to seeing where this goes, although the interface is not geared towards Windows Mobile Smartphone, it seems to be best suited for a touchscreen at the moment.

    On a side note, I didn't see any interface to specify a proxy, but I was able to set one through about:config. I have to go through an auto proxy so I just set the autoconfig_url to the URL of my proxy and the network.proxy.type to 2.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  32. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The little shits are very fast and quiet when moving. I have one in my house that belongs to my girlfriend. I don't play with her much because she is too aggressive with me but she plays fairly nice with my girlfriend. Because of her very sharp teeth and her tendency to communicate with me using her mouth, I nicknamed her "the piranha". FYI, the fennec fox is the only fox the may be legally kept as a pet in the US.

  33. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadian, eh?

  34. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really want to be able to run adblock, flashblock, and no script to keep my screen from being overtaken with adds on sites that don't have a mobile version... or even on those that do.

  35. Re:I'm impressed (NOT) by gmezero · · Score: 1

    Of course, how can this be considered mobile without Palm listed. Pffft!

  36. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not really digging it ... "Targeted at Nokia N800/810 devices, with Windows Mobile a gleam in a developers eye, no plans to develop for Symbian, and iPhone not mentioned" ... nice big market share there.

  37. Re:I'm impressed by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have one in my house that belongs to my girlfriend. I don't play with her much because she is too aggressive with me

    And this, boys and girls, is an example of the fact that pronouns do not always enhance readability.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  38. Link to mozilla's page: by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1
    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  39. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by J05H · · Score: 2, Informative

    especially stupid considering Symbian S60 makes up well over half of the smartphone market worldwide - 64% last time I checked. Not that you'll notice this if you live in the States, land of Blackberry and iPhone, but it dominates the EMEA and APAC markets - I've been using several S60 phones from Samsung and Nokia for a few months for testing and they frankly blow everything else away in terms of usability (holy crap it's a PHONE FIRST), interface design (clean and extensible) and as convergence devices.

    One problem with a Firefox browser for S60 is that it's playing catch-up to the likes of Skyfire and the integrated browser. It would be nice to see Firefox on smartphones though.

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  40. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing - Good show sir!

  41. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    While this is true,by putting the browser out for desktops it gives users a chance to "try before they buy" and decide if Fennec is right for them. It also gives them a chance to report problem areas in the controls as well as ask for features. Besides there isn't anything wrong with having a lightweight browser for your desktop. For those that are curious I just download the Fennec for Windows and it is as simple as unzip and use.

    Oh and for those that hate to RTFA(this is slashdot,after all) the link for the Windows version is here Linux here and Mac here.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  42. This is really very interesting. by Millennium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The minimal UI would be perfect not just for mobile phones, but for other small-screen devices (I'd use it on my eee, for instance). This is obviously not the core market for Fennec, but I'd love to see an extension which added back just a few "desktop/laptop" conveniences:

    • Keyboard shortcuts, at least for Back, Forward, Reload, Open Location, Find (and Find Again), Print, Cut, Copy, and Paste.
    • Scrolling around in pages, not just vertically but also horizontally.
    • Some means to highlight, cut/copy, and paste.

    Again, I'm not necessarily saying these should be folded into the core Fennec distro; "full" computers aren't its main market. But an extension would be nice.

  43. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, both the fox and the girlfriend can be aggressive ;) I read that post a couple of times before posting and still missed the pronoun issue.

  44. Re:I'm impressed by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot | Mobile Firefox Alpha 1 Released - Mozilla Firefox

    Dude... the " - Mozilla Firefox" at the end is because that's what you're using... :P

    Mine says Vimperator, you insensitive clod!

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  45. Slate usage. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    Neat-o. I'll have to install this on my slate-style Tablet PC; It's a fun toy, but you never realize how much you middle-click-for-new-tab until you can't any more.

    I've sort of worked around it with Tab Mix Plus to open _everything_ in new tabs, but something more touchscreen centric would be nice.

    --saint

  46. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Informative

    ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/
    posted using fennec on aspire one running ubuntu
    untar and click on fennec :)

    it's a little strange scrolling is done by click and drag but its working wit fine on here

  47. Good support by elfguy · · Score: 1

    I'm impressed, my site works in it. While my web site validates and works in every desktop browser, not a single mobile browser so far (Pocket IE, Symbian browser, Opera Mini) supports it, but Fennec does.

    I do have to say I'm not a fan of the back and forward button being hidden however.

    1. Re:Good support by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      What isn't working on your site? BTW, Opera Mini is a proxy based browser. Did you try Opera Mobile 9.5 which is a full browser?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  48. Re:I'm impressed by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    What "- Mozilla Firefox"? It says "- Minefield".

  49. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    eh? Both linux and OSX are used as mobile platforms. There's no way to develop Fennec for mobile OSX, though.

    IIRC WinCE has a subset of the Win32 API.

    So probably the platform glue layer for each of these desktop releases isn't astonishingly different than its mobile version.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  50. N810 users beware. by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've tried installing this a couple times on an N810 (last week) and both times it completely messed up xulrunner. Couldn't remove it, update it, reinstall it, nothin'. If you are planning on testing it on an N810, make sure you are prepared to backup and flash if necessary (I was still able to use the device after xulrunner died, but my other browser, microb stopped working).

    1. Re:N810 users beware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've tried installing this a couple times on an N810 (last week) and both times it completely messed up xulrunner. Couldn't remove it, update it, reinstall it, nothin'. If you are planning on testing it on an N810, make sure you are prepared to backup and flash if necessary (I was still able to use the device after xulrunner died, but my other browser, microb stopped working).

      Try this:
      http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23909&highlight=xulrunner

    2. Re:N810 users beware. by Ptur · · Score: 1

      yes, it did on my N810 too... but the current one now actually installs... spoiler: no need to try, it is dog slow, buggy dragging and typing,... not worth the time (I removed it again)

  51. Big deal? by grimmy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows mobile devices have the largest share of the market, why release it for a few specific nokia models if they want the largest number of users giving them feedback?

    The desktop release don't count, desktop users will install it run it twice, think "ohh that's cute" and never run it again.

    How about those of us stuck with pocketIE and opera's offerings both of which fail miserable on something as simple as a redirect.

    1. Re:Big deal? by luserSPAZ · · Score: 1

      Windows Mobile builds are being worked on:
      http://blog.mozilla.com/blassey/2008/10/11/windows-mobile-update-3-fonts/

      Given Nokia's existing work with Gecko, the N810 platform was an easy place to start. Most of the work so far has focused on the Fennec UI and mobile performance. Ports will happen, the Gecko code is very portable, it just takes some time to finish a port to a new platform. (Or, for WinCE, a platform whose port hasn't worked in a while.)

    2. Re:Big deal? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Stuck" with Opera? Opera Mobile 9.5 is the best mobile browser, period. Yes, it beats Safari.

      What redirect does Opera Mobile fail on?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    3. Re:Big deal? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Believe or not, Symbian has gigantic market share. Even Nokia's dropped (500k) S60 sales are 16 million last year.

      I am not saying they shouldn't ship to WinMO, they should also release Symbian version same time. They shouldn't make mistake of Opera ASA which costed them entire Symbian userbase (they aren't aware yet!).

    4. Re:Big deal? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Opera has the entire UIQ user base. They don't need the S60 user base since they are making money like crazy from their Windows Mobile version. S60 already has a decent browser anyway, so if anything "costed[sic] them[sic] entire Symbian userbase", that's it.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  52. Great by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 0

    My long-developed XUL application is completely screwed, the functionality in Fenek is at 30% maybe. For example, main menu doesn't work, image onclick event can't popup menu (or popup menu doesn't work at all?), all comboboxes are missing (but textboxes are there), mouse scroll button in tree doesn't work (cause it zoom the whole page), and now it completely crashed. While considering my last bugreport with MINIMAL TEST CASE was submited and completely ignored for 5 months, I think it's time to move on.

  53. Just installed it on my n800 by dbc001 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The one-click install didn't work, but the step-by-step instructions worked fine.

    It seems to run pretty slow. Can't seem to enter any text into the address bar.

    Disabled Javascript and now I can enter a URL - not sure if that's related.

    It needs a lot of work (it is an alpha) but it's exciting that they've gotten this far.

    1. Re:Just installed it on my n800 by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      You can enter text if you press the square button in the dpad. This will open the whole screen keyboard. I've been using this workaround to load Slashdot and test how the scrolling works. Try it, and file some bugs for the worse offenders in the interface (I've already done that for some text input and title bar problems).

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  54. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

    You can, in fact, develop Fennec for mobile OSX. Any version released through the iphone app store could not include Javascript capabilities, though -- people could write their applications in js and release them through other channels in that case.

  55. Back and forward buttons hidden, why? by guest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems like a big mistake to hide the back and forward buttons, the buttons that users are frequently going to want to use. I'd much prefer that they hide the Bookmarks button and put the forward and back buttons on the main screen so I can get to them without having to move the screen to the left first.

    --
    pw:secret
  56. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Any version released through the iphone app store could not include Javascript capabilities

    Fennec uses JavaScript and XUL to render itself.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  57. Re:Opera mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opera Mobile's not a bad browser at all.

    Yes it is, try any extended use on symbian S60v3 platform like Nokia E90 communicator and you'll see why. Frequent crashes (even the whole phone reboots), pages loaded only after n times of clicking the link, wrong keyboard maps, incorrect rendering of web pages (yes, that includes slashdot).
    It's only good in one way: quite fast.

  58. Re:I'm impressed by mickwd · · Score: 1

    I have one in my house that belongs to my girlfriend. I don't play with her much because she is too aggressive with me

    And this, boys and girls, is an example of the fact that pronouns do not always enhance readability.

    Yes, but she's a fox.

  59. acid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90/100

    acid3.acidtests.org

  60. This is going nowhwere by Eil · · Score: 1

    All I want for xmas is a WebKit browser.

    The standard web browser for the N800/N10 devices is MicroB, which is based on Gecko and it's a royal piece of crap. It's VERY slow, buggy, non-intuitive, and lacking most of the standard features of any modern desktop browser. The only redeeming quality is that it does Javascript and Flash just as well as Firefox but of course orders of magnitude slower. With Nokia acquiring Trolltech, I figured we'd see a good WebKit-based browser around the corner, but the Nokia developers still seem married to Gecko. Nokia needs to completely rework Maemo from the ground with Qt and Wekbit if they ever want to create a decent user experience.

    I downloaded Fennec onto my 2.6GHz deskop and my 320MHz MIPS N800. On the desktop, performance seemed to be about on par with Firefox (that is to say, decent but not great) and at 9MB, it's even about the same size. On the N800, it was completely unusable. It took almost a full minute to load and going back and forth between tabs and controls was painful. Scrolling pages sucked too.

    I know it's still in alpha, but unless they can trim the size back by at least half and increase performance at least tenfold, it still will not be a viable solution until phones and Internet tablets start shipping with 1GHz processors. Gecko is just not a solution for embedded browsers.

    Nokia needs to take Apple's lead and release a WebKit-based browser for their tablets and phones. WebKit is plenty fast, standards-compliant, stable, and above all, proven. The only thing my N800 does particularly well is download and play podcasts. I'd love to be able to actually use it as an Internet tablet.

    1. Re:This is going nowhwere by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is Nokia and Webkit love/hate relationship. They were all fine with Opera browser and dropped it for Webkit and even their Europe pages doesn't render fine on ANY webkit based browser including the S60 browser which is a huge deal.

      You may have heard the Symbian S60 browser based on Webkit. It only worked for buying 2 years old Opera 8.65 mobile for me at least.

      I am just saying be careful what you wish for regarding Webkit and Nokia. Webkit can be implemented in awfully wrong ways.

      What about Konqueror on that device? Impossible?

    2. Re:This is going nowhwere by Eil · · Score: 1

      What about Konqueror on that device? Impossible?

      People have gotten the entire KDE 3.5 suite to run on the N800 but the UI is obviously not well-optimized for it and loading applications takes a good long while. (Once they're loaded, though, they don't perform too poorly.) As well, I'm sure there are a bunch of libraries being loaded that aren't strictly needed on a tablet. Some googling lead me to the following page which implies that KDE 4.x is being actively developed for the tablets as it shows a good number of applications running with modified tablet-style UI:

      http://kde.garage.maemo.org/screenshots_kdebase.html

      Maybe I'll have a go at getting konqueror running on mine soon.

  61. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by luserSPAZ · · Score: 1

    Windows Mobile builds are fairly close:
    http://blog.mozilla.com/blassey/2008/10/11/windows-mobile-update-3-fonts/

    I know there has been interest in a Symbian port, but I don't know if anyone is looking into it. As opposed to something like the N810 (Linux) or Windows Mobile, porting to an entirely new platform is a bit more work, so it can take a significant effort. The iPhone port wouldn't be a huge amount of work, but the distribution would be a non-starter, so it hardly seems worth the effort.

  62. Anybody with EeePCs or netbooks, ... by onitzuka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... could use Fennec right now. :-)

  63. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about firefox? omg, I cant keep firefox at home!

  64. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    Just odd that the single biggest platform is the lowest priority on the dev list. N800/810 is "cooler", but hardly a notable marketshare.

  65. Re:Windows Linux Mac. by Yer+Mum · · Score: 1

    They can't put it out on the iPhone because it would duplicate the functionality of Apple's Safari.

    But if it's not on Symbian, it's simply not going to compete against Opera Mobile.

  66. Dear developers at Mozilla and Opera by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    "Converged mobile device shipments (S60 phones) were 15.5 million (down from 16 million in Q3 2007) including 9 million Nseries and 3 million Eseries devices."

    This comes from Nokia only. There are many other vendors producing Symbian handsets. When Symbian becomes open source and free, you may even see it on current J2ME "dumb" cheap phones.

    As Opera did the unimaginable by not releasing Opera 9 beta for Symbian and now enjoying Windows Mobile bug reports rather than their own issues and as I remember Mozilla released a Windows Mobile version one time, I am just saying... Don't do same mistake again.

    Unless Apple tells you privately that they will make it possible to release a full feature browser on iPhone, don't spare a byte of coding to it too.

    Point is: Don't ignore Symbian. Especially for currently unrealistic iPhone or MS controlled Windows Mobile.

    1. Re:Dear developers at Mozilla and Opera by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      S60 already has a decent browser presintalled. There's probably not business for Opera there. On the other hand, HTC's Windows Mobile phones are selling like crazy. Opera didn't do "the unimaginable". They did a very clever thing since they got onto high-volume handsets because mobile IE sucks. They are now making "unimaginable" amounts of money because they put their resources on WM rather than S60.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  67. Re:Opera mobile by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    Just because Opera doesn't run on your favorite platform doesn't make it a bad browser. If it does run on a platform, it's excellent. Obviously there's a problem with your platform of choice which causes Opera to bug out. It works fine on other platforms.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.