Slashdot Mirror


EFF Sues To Overturn Telecom Immunity

Mike writes "The title says it all — The EFF is suing to have the unconstitutional telecom immunity overturned. 'In a brief filed in the US District Court [PDF] in San Francisco, the EFF argues that the flawed FISA Amendments Act (FAA) violates the federal government's separation of powers as established in the Constitution and robs innocent telecom customers of their rights without due process of law. [...] "We have overwhelming record evidence that the domestic spying program is operating far outside the bounds of the law," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl. "Intelligence agencies, telecoms, and the Administration want to sweep this case under the rug, but the Constitution won't permit it."'"

3 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Contractual EFF Support Link! by ntk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Help us continue this fight: http://secure.eff.org/wiretapping

    We've just opened a new page for student rates: http://www.eff.org/students

    Third-party details on how EFF compares to other non-profit groups: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=7576

    (Unlike many groups, the vast majority of EFF's funding comes from individual donations: it's directly due to personal contributions that we can fight these and civil liberty cases.)

  2. Re:Good luck with that by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

    This administration does what it wants, without repercussions. They've already done several things that go against the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. They don't care, won't care, and have never cared about trifles like the founding documents of the country.

    Pop Quiz:
    Which Presidential aspirant voted for the FISA Amendments Act:
    A) John McCain
    B) Barack Obama
    C) A & B

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  3. Re:Noob questions by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Informative

    Qwest stood up for our rights and turned down the requests.
    They also paid the price in the form of losing some lucrative government contracts that had previously been a lock.