Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Agrees To Take $200-Per-File In Texas Case

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In a San Antonio, Texas case, Maverick v. Harper, in which a young woman was accused of having committed copyright infringement at the age of 16, the Judge denied the RIAA's summary judgment motion this summer, saying there were factual issues as to whether the defendant qualified for the 'innocent infringement' defense. He offered the record companies a way out, however, saying he would grant them a judgment if they agreed to take only $200 — as opposed to the $9,250 they sought from Jammie Thomas or the $750 they usually seek — per infringed recording. We have recently learned that, after the Judge denied the RIAA's reconsideration motion and scheduled a trial date, the RIAA filed papers agreeing to take the $200-per-recording amount. While $200 is still about 600 times the amount of the actual damages, it's better than paying 26,000 times the actual damages, which is what the RIAA tried to squeeze out of Ms. Thomas." This is a reversal of the RIAA's rejection of the $200 award per song last month.

12 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. Woohoo! by guyminuslife · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a Texan, and this is great news. I only owe them 2 million dollars!

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  2. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anonymous Coward Agrees To Take 5 Cents-Per-Blowjob To Suck CmdrTaco's Two-Inch Dick

    That's all, AC? You must really be a fan!

  3. How generous by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! Now you're only cutting off one of my balls? You're so charitable!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  4. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're forced to work as a discwasher.

  5. Re:That's still too high. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Okay, tagged "thievingcunts" because of the people stealing music. They are bastards.

  6. Re:It's still not really reasonable by BakaHoushi · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is a poor analogy.
    I mean, the mobsters at least won't break your store if you pay (As compared to losing service for a DRM-enabled music file). Members of the mafia work hard, and don't appreciate such an insulting comparison.

  7. Re:Judge can reason evidence, can he administer? by AngryLlama · · Score: 5, Funny

    Home of the rave? I would assume that is in Europe some place.

  8. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They can have all my stuff. We'll start with the bullets.

  9. Re:She'll be fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's a really talented and well-written article.

    It's got a voice like an angel and legs like Ginger Rogers.

  10. Re:It's still not really reasonable by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    No. I think that the RIAA employs soul-eating undead in the literal sense, and has satellite offices in R'Lyeh and other convenient locations.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  11. Re:It's still not really reasonable by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think that the RIAA employs soul-eating undead

    I can confirm.

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
  12. The New Math? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 3, Funny

    600 x $0 = $200? Gee, math is hard...

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.