Slashdot Mirror


X-Rays Emitted From Ordinary Scotch Tape

Maximum Prophet writes "When I was in High School, I built an X-Ray machine that (probably) didn't produce any X-Rays. I used an old vacuum tube and high voltage. Little did I know that simple triboluminescence would have enough energy to do useful work." The catch: you'll need to peel your tape in a vacuum, and have the x-ray film at the ready.

6 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I paid $75 for an x-ray machine at Goodwill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um, X-rays don't hurt. Stupid-rays do, though. That's probably what you were feeling.

  2. Re:Hmmmm .... by treeves · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article suggests Bremsstrahlung (note the 3rd paragraph of the linked article) of the electrons jumping from the non-sticky surface to the sticky surface of the tape - I guess the air present in a non-vacuum situation lets the electrons slow gradually or maybe have lower initial velocity - that part is unclear from the article.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  3. not bloody likely by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Typical X-ray machines use 50 to 200 kilovolts and milliamps of electrons slamming into a tungsten target. Nothing less will do.

    It's kinda unlikely Scotch (brand) tape can bypass all the bottlenecks and emit copious X-rays.

    It's much more likely they're getting electrostatic discharges in the film. The New Age loonballs call it "Kirlian Photography".

    I'll be glad to eat a hat if this pans out. Until then I'll just wear it.

  4. Re:Can the article example serve as prior art? by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Informative

    the first should result in the second failing to get a patent

    No, it really shouldn't. There's a difference between describing a physical phenomenon and coming up with an application for it. Just because tape produces x-rays does not mean that it is intuitivly obvious how to create a portable x-ray machine out of it. Ask yourself if you could knock one together in your garage this weekend, knowing only that x causes y.

  5. Re:In other news... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...EVERYTHING in the universe is radioactive to some degree. Except for iron.

    To be radioactive you have to have nuclei. 96% of the Universe is Dark Matter and Dark Energy that does not contain any nuclei. Of the remaining 4% the vast majority is in stable isotopes of hydrogen and helium and so is not radioactive. Additionally there are radioactive isotopes of iron. Iron-56 may be the most stable atomic nucleus but there are many other isotopes of iron some of which are radioactive.

  6. Video by Peter+Lake · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's an informative video in Nature about the phenomenom and the experiment: http://www.nature.com/nature/videoarchive/x-rays/

    They even show how to take x-rays using scotch tape.

    --

    All Rights Reversed.