Slashdot Mirror


Google Founders Buy Fighter Jet

Ponca City, We love you writes "The NY Times reports that H211 LLC, a company controlled by Google's top executives, including billionaire founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, appears to have added to its fleet a Dornier Alpha Jet, a light jet attack and advanced trainer aircraft manufactured by Dornier of Germany and Dassault-Breguet of France. The 1982 Alpha-Jet seats two and was originally used by European air forces, but is now being sold relatively cheaply to civilians. The jet has landing rights at Moffett Field, the NASA-operated airfield that is a stone's throw from the Google campus. It is not clear who exactly flies the fighter jet, although Google chief executive Eric Schmidt is an avid pilot. If the top Googlers indeed own the fighter jet, they would be following in the footsteps of Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison, who has owned several aircraft, including fighter jets."

40 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Should it be asked? by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are these guys Yahoos??

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  2. In other news by xs650 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Microsoft is installing anti-aircraft emplacements

    1. Re:In other news by rhyder128k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Command And Conquer 5: Microsoft vs Google.

      Take my tip - don't buy too many shipping crate data centres at the beginning as you're better off upgrading to an IPv6 infrastructure as early as possible.

      Some people build up a massive force of tanks and try to wear MS down (the MS tanks are unreliable, they run their own software) but I prefer to create my own web browser and give away as much free email storage as I can. I don't like using too much lock-in if I'm playing as Google but it's unavoidable if you want to win.

      I hate those "novelty" missions where you've got to get Balmer across the map or something.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
  3. Pot, meet Kettle by Thiez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see you own a computer. Surely you could have sent your money to Africa instead?

    1. Re:Pot, meet Kettle by turtledawn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmm. Using the fighter jet to take out clumps of corrupt African officials may be the single best piece of charity Sergei and Brin could ever offer them, as at least them the money us regular folks send over might have a chance of actually reaching the citizens and being used for its intended purposes. :-)

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    2. Re:Pot, meet Kettle by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wouldn't work. What ever governments replaced the ones wiped out would become corrupt in a few, short years. Just look at Zimbabwe if you need an example.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:Pot, meet Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Zimbabwe has had the same leader since the first post-independence election in 1980. Not sure how that supports your point.

    4. Re:Pot, meet Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Larry and Sergey have shown unquestionably that they are utterly out of touch.

      Lets see... you state a bunch of things going on in a country, then you use that as a basis to criticize how private personal funds are used by private personal people to buy something they want? Really? Who's the one out of touch? Have you bought anything recently... like say a video game, movie, or music? Then you're as much as fault as these guys, who happen to just have more spending power than you and you're jealous about it.

      I won't go into the fact that these guys probably just saved a few people their jobs by spending their money... but oh well.

    5. Re:Pot, meet Kettle by Medievalist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wouldn't work. What ever governments replaced the ones wiped out would become corrupt in a few, short years. Just look at Zimbabwe if you need an example.

      Zimbabwe has had the same leader since the first post-independence election in 1980. Not sure how that supports your point.

      Um, because said leader went from freedom fighter to corrupt entrenched establishment in a few, short years. Doesn't seem hard to understand... maybe you should ask Joshua Nkomo how he feels about it.

    6. Re:Pot, meet Kettle by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That just means you need to bomb them again. Many military theologians interpret the smitings in the Old Testament as an airpower-centric and profoundly interventionist foreign policy on the part of the Almighty.

      Seriously I read an article in a left of centre British paper interviewing people from an Afghan village that was peaceful until the Taliban arrived and set up shop. The Taliban terrorised people, mostly women, but they also beat a few of the men to death until the villagers stopped doing anything they objected to. Which was pretty munch anything. At the start of the US invasion the house the Taliban had commandeered was suddenly blown to bits by a 2000lb laser guided bomb from a US fighter. The Taliban were all either killed or left, no one knew for sure, but in any case the village was free of their alien influence one morning and minus one house.

      The coolest part was at the end when one of the Afghans pointed to the contrails from a B52 flying overhead and said that so long as they were on the prowl, the Taliban would not come back and life would be good.

      If it carried on for long enough, maybe people would regard the aircraft overhead a bit like an awesomly powerful deity with an inexplicable fondness for womens rights. Come to think of it, the Old Testament God had inexplicable preferences too. Perhaps Gods need to be both ultra powerful and hard to understand to make people worship them and not their competitors.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. hint by kulakovich · · Score: 4, Funny

    > It is not clear who exactly flies the fighter jet,

    Hint: The Google AI

  5. Re:So? by gclef · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, Red Bull is definitely evil. You can tell by the taste.

  6. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    When fighter jets, tanks, etc. are sold to civilians, most of the fun stuff is ripped out.

    This is basically the rich fuck's version of buying a sports car when you're 50 to stroke your ego.

  7. Re:So? by arudloff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, Red Bull is definitely evil. You can tell by the taste.

    Or by it's association with Jagermeister.

  8. Re:So? by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Red Bull: The Taste of Evil.

    It gives you wings, but they don't say the wings are featherless...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  9. Funny thing to have around by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't it hard to live up to "do no evil" when you have a strike-capable air force? This is a slippery slope, indeed. I think the next time the Yahoo! talks escalate, things just might go a little differently.

  10. Re:Not that unusual. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Governator owns a number of tanks. Including the one he drove when he was in the military.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  11. Far out thought by svendsen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is beyond the realm of reality so cut me some slack...

    Corporations (or their top execs) are starting to buy military hardware. Do you think we will ever see a corporation declare war on another corporation?

    Gives a whole new meaning to hostile takeover...

    1. Re:Far out thought by BlowHole666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is beyond the realm of reality so cut me some slack... Corporations (or their top execs) are starting to buy military hardware. Do you think we will ever see a corporation declare war on another corporation? Gives a whole new meaning to hostile takeover...

      You mean like the East India Company?

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    2. Re:Far out thought by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Corporations (or their top execs) are starting to buy military hardware. Do you think we will ever see a corporation declare war on another corporation?

      Corporations have, relatively recently, declared war on other countries, not just other companies.

      The British & Dutch East India Trading Company is the first one that comes to mind which had an army, navy, minted money, warred with countries & companies and setup & administered governments.

      We talk about corporate influence in government, but what exists now pales in comparison to the overt control and militarism of years gone past.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  12. Space Weapons must be next? by NobodyExpects · · Score: 4, Funny

    So... Google has added an "airforce" to complement their navy...

  13. When spear meets shield... by Vexler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fighter jet, which has been in "Beta" for years.

    AA guns, with targeting system running Vista.

    Ought to be a good show.

    1. Re:When spear meets shield... by Columcille · · Score: 4, Funny

      The classic problem: What happens if you put Star Wars Stormtroopers - who can't hit the broadside of a planet - up against Star Trek red shirts - who get killed the moment they do anything? The question here is, which side is the storm troopers and which side the red shirts?

      --
      I love my sig.
  14. Just wait till Obama gets elected... by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll have to offer free rides to people who could never afford a plane of their own.

  15. Re:That's right, mods by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So everyone with more money than you should give it all to charity?

    You think those starving children in Africa wouldn't go out for a meal at a fancy restaurant if they were given a billion pounds? Then perhaps buy some nice shoes? They could just use it to buy everyone in their country just the right amount of food to make sure they're not classed as 'starving' for a while, but I highly suspect they might want to enjoy themselves a little too. They might even buy a bike or a car. You know, some people like to have fun occasionally, when it is within their means?

    I'm very sure Larry and Sergey have caused more money to go to charity than you ever will. Just because they also want to use their money - money that they have earned by creating an excellent business - to have a bit of fun doesn't make them evil. It's easy to point the finger, but I bet you'd buy a nice car and house if you were a billionaire, rather than live in a slum. Any of us slashdotters could survive on a lot less than what we have. Why do you even have a slashdot account and access to a computer? Why aren't you out there earning as much money as you can so that you can redistribute the wealth?

    The problem is not with our "consumerist culture", it's with corrupt and moronic governments who run their countries into the ground and treat their citizens like shit. No amount of charity is going to turn a country like that around if its leaders are corrupt.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  16. Mig-21 on Ebay a couple weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a former Czech air force MIG-21 for sale on Ebay a couple weeks ago with a "buy it now" price of only $45K. The aircraft was located in Ohio and was in ready-to-fly restored condition, and is actively flown in air shows. While the purchase price was cheap, it is hideously expensive to operate a MIG-21. A half-hour flight consumes almost $2000 worth of Jet-A fuel. Also a MIG-21 can only carry about two hour's worth of fuel onboard anyway. The engine in it has to be overhauled at a cost of over $100K about every 250 hours of flight time too, since Russian jet engines are built with such loose mechanical tolerances in the moving parts.

  17. It's a trainer by confused+one · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's an advanced trainer. It's a toy. (albeit a rich man's toy). What's the big deal -- he already owns several aircraft. This isn't even uncommon.

    Now, if you told me he bought a couple of fully armed F22's, THAT would be news. (you may, of course, substitute your plane of choice for the F22)

  18. Finally Google shifts to Iceland by ghoul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well they have the cheap geothermal power and the free cooling for the datacenters. The only hitch was how out of the way iceland is. But it does have an abandoned NATO airfield so now that the top execs can jet in and out in an hour or so at supersonic speeds goodbye Silicon Valley Hello Reykjavik. Solves all the turnover problem too as in "You want to leave Google and join Microsoft. Fine as soon as you get security clearance from the Icelandic government you can leave (never that is)" With Iceland being bankrupt they would sell their souls and change their national anthem to "Do no evil" if Google comes calling.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  19. Re:That's right, mods by Shade+of+Pyrrhus · · Score: 4, Informative
    So what is the jet really for, though? For fun? According to another article...

    Science, of course! H211 LLC uses many of its jets for NASA-sponsored experiments, since they operate primarily out of Moffett field, a NASA-controlled airstrip that's conveniently located right next to Google's Mountain View HQ. The jet was acquired to carry scientific instruments that could not be rigged up to Boeing 757/767 and Gulfstream jets the company already operates, some of which were used to monitor the re-entry of the ESA's Jules Verne satellite.

  20. Re:Not that unusual. by sorak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most likely they purchased it through a privately held company because companies have lessened license restrictions for purchasing any class of weapon (ie, if you want to own an RPG legally, just start a corporation and you can buy whatever you want). I'm not sure if licensure is necessary for military aircraft (even decommissioned) but who knows, maybe that's the reason? Plus if they'd bought it through google maybe they'd be concerned about a shareholder backlash? These are just guesses btw, but its what I would surmise.

    But if they used Google Checkout, they could have gotten $10 dollars off.

  21. Re:That's right, mods by mr_mischief · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sam Walton is dead. It's difficult to drive a pickup while afflicted with such a condition.

  22. Re:That's right, mods by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmmmm. And Sarah Palin's $150,000 was also good fiscal prudence, too?

    I'm not voting for her either way, but I fail to see why people pounce on her for this. She's a public figure that is engaging in the mother of all popularity contests. Like it or not, appearance makes a HUGE difference to the American people. That $150,000 is an investment in her campaign plain and simple. If she stood up there in K-mart clothes people would have perceived her as less sophisticated.

    Essentially, consider it part of the advertising budget. When you're trying to sell yourself to a nation packaging is important.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  23. Re:That's right, mods by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    When they start doing practice runs over Microsoft, the mission will be obvious.

  24. Re:Not that unusual. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Informative

    Purchasing through an LLC isn't that big of a deal. It just gives an easier way to split ownership, liability, maintenance, etc.

    Bob Lutz has owned two Czech built L-39's. One was damaged in a landing accident and donated to the Yankee Air Museum. It was destroyed by fire in 2004. His current L-39 is in Marine corps livery. I don't believe he's ever owned a Mig, though the original L-39 was in Czech colors.

    Jack Roush currently owns two P-51's. "Gentleman Jim" a P-51D that is for lack of a better term, his 'daily driver.' He flies this aircraft to some of the Nascar races, when he's got time. His 2nd P-51 is a gorgeous, freshly restored B model "Old Crow." At one point he had three mustangs, the other being another D Model P-51 semi-incorrectly painted as "Old Crow", formerly "Rascal." This has since been sold to the founder of Scotts lawn care. Roush also owns a T-6, and several other non-military jets.

    These are all housed at, or are frequent visitors to, Willow Run Airport in Ypsilanti / Belleville, MI. In addition, there are a Mig-17, Mig-21, and Alpha Jet (in luftwaffe markings), and a Stinson L-2 that are based out of Willow Run, where we house our B-25, B-17, and C-47.

    Suffice to say, being the admin for Yankee Air Museum (check the homepage) affords the opportunity to see some pretty interesting day-to-day air traffic.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  25. Re:That's right, mods by florescent_beige · · Score: 5, Informative

    The construction and maintenance of a fighter jet is one of the more labour intensive things you can buy. So I look at this as a large transfer of money from the rich guys to working people.

    Our little company has done engineering work for the Canadian Forces Alpha Jets but mostly we convert super expensive large business jets. We charge a lot.

    Flying toys are one of the worlds best wealth re-distributors. Small numbers of ridiculously wealthy middle eastern princes and other "principles" keep our team of engineers and techies employed, not to mention a whole raft of suppliers. And then you have to include all the people who work for airframe OEMs.

    After they buy something from us they are quite a bit less wealthy than they were before.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  26. Re:That's right, mods by rhsanborn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks, now I have images of Steve Ballmer on the roof of MS HQ with a chair in one hand screaming, "Bring it on!" at Larry and Sergey strafing.

  27. These are newbies compared to the Kirlin Air Force by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Kirlin family runs one of the world's the largest chains of Hallmark cards and gifts franchises (Kirlin's Hallmark stores, based out of Quincy, Illinois). Two sons of founder Dale Kirlin Sr. (Dale Jr. and Gary) went into the family business.

    The other son, Don Kirlin, pursued an aviation career with the US Navy and Us Airways before he started Red Air which is a company also based out of Quincy, IL. Don has lived in Quincy, in Boulder, Colorado, and also in Kyrgyzstan while working on acquiring a former Soviet fighter.

    Red Air operates a fleet of Mig, Alpha, and Vodochody fighter aircraft in training maneuvers with US and Canadian fighter groups. Their former USAF and US Navy flight instructors flying foreign-built fighters make for a much more realistic training scenario than simulators or flying US aircraft against other US aircraft.

    If you have the cash, the licenses, and the desire then check out his foreign fighter and trainer sales business, Air USA. Weapons systems are not included, of course.

    Don's also the man behind the World Free Fall Convention, which brought visitors from every state and 70 foreign countries to Quincy, IL and Rantoul, IL for 17 years and featured during that time over 600,000 jumps. Jump platforms included everything from a B-17 bomber to the Family Channel blimp. Even a Super Constellation and a Boeing 727 have been featured.

    So if you really want to talk about privately held air power, Oracle and Google take a back seat to the black sheep son of a greeting card and gift store magnate.

  28. New toys for the wealthy by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were going to buy a Hummer, but the fighter jet gets better gas mileage.

  29. Re:That's right, mods by Lars+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft's next patent: the anti aircraft chair

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  30. Re:That's right, mods by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

    Advertising budget, yes. Personal expenditures, no. They are forbidden by the campaign laws that John McCain pushed through Congress. Clothing qualifies as personal expenditures. It appears that the RNC bought them so these purchases are exempt from those rules. However, given the state of the economy and the campaign's attempt to portray her as a "hockey mom", the amount of the purchases appear to be unwise.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.