Slashdot Mirror


Packs of Robots Will Hunt Down Uncooperative Humans

Ostracus writes "The latest request from the Pentagon jars the senses. At least, it did mine. They are looking for contractors to 'develop a software/hardware suite that would enable a multi-robot team, together with a human operator, to search for and detect a non-cooperative human subject. The main research task will involve determining the movements of the robot team through the environment to maximize the opportunity to find the subject ... Typical robots for this type of activity are expected to weigh less than 100 Kg and the team would have three to five robots.'" To be fair, they plan to use the Multi-Robot Pursuit System for less nefarious-sounding purposes as well. They note that the robots would "have potential commercialization within search and rescue, fire fighting, reconnaissance, and automated biological, chemical and radiation sensing with mobile platforms."

20 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. robots.txt by sveard · · Score: 5, Funny

    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /

  2. I bet this is.... by s0litaire · · Score: 3, Funny

    Co-Funded by the I.R.S.

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:I bet this is.... by s0litaire · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank god I'm British... Oh! wait... The Inland Revenue service.... eek!!

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  3. Running man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds fun, they should make it a game show. Big prize if you can survive a week without capture.

  4. Because it's FINALLY appropriate. by Xaositecte · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, Welcome our new Robotic Overlords.

  5. I have to say it.... by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come with me if you want to live.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  6. Re:Since they're not people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    .... can I just shoot them if they try to hunt me down? What about a nice EMP blast? And will they be armed? Or will they behave more like searchers from the Chronicles of Riddick?

    I'm really not sure if I'm looking forward to that. Either they won't be armed, and they'll be easily disabled, or they will be, and then.... Meh.

    The fun thing about EMP blasts are that, you know, the easiest way to make them is by detonating a nuclear weapon in the air. If you consider that "easily disabled", remind me to not get on your shitlist :)

  7. Note to self: by Narnie · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the way home I need:
    - toothpaste
    - beer
    - cereal
    - aluminum foil (for tin hat)

    Once home:
    - google "conspiracy theories"
    - google "howto electromagnetic pulse"
    - google "group robot porn"

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
  8. Robotic domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldn't make more sense to capture and enslave all the cooperative humans first?
    Then the uncooperative ones can be terminated...

  9. I, For One by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Funny

    welcome our new, robot hunting packs.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  10. what's this plan missing? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, right. Could they manage to fuel the robots off of metabolized human flesh? Oh, and make their heads look like skulls.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  11. Why do I keep hearing... by FlyByPC · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  12. compliance by mrbobjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what if I comply? I was told I had ten seconds to comply!

  13. Re:Three Laws of Robotics by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would never use a gun to shoot an animal or human for any reason.

    But a robot-- there is no hesitation if it came to that. Indeed, one good potshot at an Intel robot deserves a full clip. AMD, I'm not so sure.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  14. Re:Three Laws of Robotics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    [robot voice] I hate your face !

  15. Re:Three Laws of Robotics by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I also purchased a second weapon, realizing the limitations of the one I had when it came to home defense.

    Yeah, man. When those wild boars start coming down the chimney you gotta be ready.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  16. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Plus, he ate everything he ever did shoot. He's old school southern ex-military.

    Hey remember that time he took a shot at a deer and missed and hit a tree? He just shrugged and said "Well shucks! I guess I gots to eat that ole tree now!" And then he cut down that sequoia and ate the whole darn tootin thing.

    His rule of eating everything he ever did shoot got him into a lot of trouble in the military. After the third time that he ate every target on the rifle range, well the dang US Army just got sick of his fat ass and done kicked him right on out of there.

    But he still eats every durn thing he ever shoots. He's just that kind of guy.

  17. Re:I think I see a flaw in their plans... by dacut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Insightful? Insightful? I was being flippant. :-P

    This is why I should never be a manager (or, by extension, evil overlord). I'll make some typically wise-ass remark ("Gee, why don't you just go drop a few random tables from the customer database?"), only to have one of my minions dutifully carry this out.

  18. Re:Three Laws of Robotics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    close, but no Woody Allen. You should have ended with:
    In a culinary sense, it was good. In an existential sense, it was probably the most gut-wrenching meal I have ever had.

  19. Re:Three Laws of Robotics by Thiez · · Score: 3, Funny

    > It may be that the purpose for biological intelligence is to create machine intelligence.

    On what evidence do you base this statement? Please convince me, I'd love to have a purpose.