Canadian Court Rules "Hyperlink" Is Not Defamation
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In a landmark ruling, a Canadian court has ruled that a web site's publication of hyperlinks to an allegedly defamatory web site is not in and of itself a 'publication,' and therefore cannot in and of itself constitute defamation. In a 10-page decision [PDF], Crookes v. Wikimedia, Sup. Ct., British Columbia, Judge Keller dismissed the libel case against Jon Newton, the publisher of p2pnet.net, which was based on the fact that his article contained links to the allegedly defamatory site, since hyperlinks, the Court reasoned, are analogous to footnotes, rather than constituting a 'republication.' Mr. Newton was represented in the case by famous libel, slander, and civil liberties lawyer Dan Burnett of Vancouver, British Columbia."
The entire text of this post was lifted from here!
I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
CowboyNeal resumes breathing, and takes his finger off the main power switch.
I didn't know Yoda was canadian!
THE SCOOP IS IN!
Hyperlinks are more like references rather than footnotes.
Well, they're really like a lot of tube entrances...
A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
Pssst: While you were posting, there were some kids on your lawn. Possibly trampling your azaleas.
I wish all of my decisions were ten paged!
You don't have to be such a Nazi about it.
Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
Not just defamatory; it would be Bible-libel.
"They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
"Your honour I would like to prove my point with this simple demonstration. The link you see on my screen appears harmless enough, but when I click it...."
"Jesus H Christ! What the fuck is that?! Turn it off! Turn it off! Case dismissed! Clear the court room!"
Genesis 1:32 And God typed