Slashdot Mirror


NASA Orbiter Reveals Details of a Moister Mars

Matt_dk writes "NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has observed a new category of minerals spread across large regions of Mars. This discovery suggests that liquid water remained on the planet's surface a billion years later than scientists believed, and it played an important role in shaping the planet's surface and possibly hosting life."

94 comments

  1. Moister Mars by tpheiska · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moister Mars.... mmm.... sweet...

    --
    "wahts woring iwth my tyoping?"
    1. Re:Moister Mars by Pikiwedia.net · · Score: 4, Funny

      This means that there is water on Mars, which means that you can grow grain, which .. When can we expect the first bottle of martian whisky?

    2. Re:Moister Mars by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why candy bars stored at a temperature where their oils begin to leak out is particularly Mmmm inducing...

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    3. Re:Moister Mars by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      As soon as Duck Dodgers negotiates the deal with the queen.

    4. Re:Moister Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, with antioxidants

    5. Re:Moister Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to my Triton-vania Twist?
      It's now the Mars
      It's now the Moister Mars
      The Moister Mars...

  2. mmm... moist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    and delicious! Reminds me of that time I accidentally left a mars candy bar in my shirt pocket on laundry day. OK, it was not delicious, it was pretty gross. It also involved a lot of coins and a lot more detergent.

  3. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your not worth my mod points.

  4. Moist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Due to probing?

    1. Re:Moist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine it was moist before the probes got there.

      That is to say, it was moist in anticipation of probing.

      Venus, on the other hand, got all hot and bothered in anticipation.

      The moon's a harsh mistress, so it just stayed cold. Which just proves the moon is less adventurous than mars.

      Jupiter's got that big red spot, which implies it was probed even before Galileo saw action.

    2. Re:Moist by HardCase · · Score: 1

      I thought the headline was talking about "molester Mars", so I was really looking forward to some startling research.

    3. Re:Moist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it worked on your wife last night.

  5. Mars: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mars: What The Earth Will Look Like If We Fuck Up Too Much

    1. Re:Mars: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean Mars is the ultimate Red State?

    2. Re:Mars: by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Venus: What The Earth Will Look Like If We Fuck Up Too Much In The Other Direction

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:Mars: by paniq · · Score: 1

      Is that a threat or a promise?

      --
      Do not trust this signature.
    4. Re:Mars: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mercury. What The Earth Will Look Like If Giant Alien Spaceships Strip Mine The Mantle.

    5. Re:Mars: by confused+one · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mercury: What the Earth is eventually going to look like, no matter what we do.

    6. Re:Mars: by E++99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mercury: What the Earth is eventually going to look like, no matter what we do.

      You mean, unless Barack Obama is elected president.

    7. Re:Mars: by Kagura · · Score: 1

      The sun: What the Earth would look like if its mass were 332,918 times larger.

    8. Re:Mars: by alexj33 · · Score: 1

      The earth: What Arrakis will look like if we let Atreides and those $%#@! Fremen have their way.

    9. Re:Mars: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pluto: what the Earth would look like if it wasn't a planet.

      (Posting anonymously to avoid getting karma-bombed by the "Pluto is a planet!" mujaheddin.)

    10. Re:Mars: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infidel! Tell me more of this 'Pluto' you speak of?

    11. Re:Mars: by WindShadow · · Score: 1

      Global warming - execute game over sequence

  6. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wars increase economic activity

    And why not? It sure worked wonders for Deep Space Nine and Voyager's ratings!

  7. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by simaolation · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wars increase economic activity

    And why not? It sure worked wonders for Deep Space Nine and Voyager's ratings!

    mod +2 Star Trek Reference!

  8. Stop it. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time someone claims ANYTHING about water on mars, it always trails with "There could have been/should/would been life!". Find me a fossil and then we'll talk.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fossil. Check. And it is already on Earth.

    2. Re:Stop it. by megamerican · · Score: 2, Informative

      Find me a fossil and then we'll talk.

      Leave John McCain alone!

      But in all seriousness, there is a reason why they use the word possibility. That means there may or may not be life. A fossil would mean there is proof of life. They say possiblity because it interests most people. Just saying they found more water than expected is boring. We already know there is water there. How much water there is doesn't mean much to most people.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    3. Re:Stop it. by ChienAndalu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean by fossil? Life on earth was consisting of creatures less complex than bacteria for a billion years, if earth dried out at that time, I doubt that you would find "fossils" very easily.

    4. Re:Stop it. by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      meh, then you'll claim god put the fossil there to fool us, I'm not playing your games.

    5. Re:Stop it. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Find me a fossil and then we'll talk.

      Fossil?!?!

      My privately funded Mars mission plans to bring back real, live, dead Martian Roadkill in a freezer!

      Watch for it on CNN.

      Seriously, you might have missed the "Scientific Hoax" thread, a while back. This latest water-on-Mars news opens up broader horizons for hoaxers.

      But, how do you convince folks that you have actually been to Mars?

      Nah, people will believe anything they want to.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:Stop it. by jollyreaper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Every time someone claims ANYTHING about water on mars, it always trails with "There could have been/should/would been life!". Find me a fossil and then we'll talk.

      McCain?

      *gasps of outrage*

      What, too soon?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    7. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave John McCain alone!

      I, for one, am looking forward to a week from now, when all these overdone McCain/Obama references can end.

    8. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Aren't you the idiot who claimed the Apple store didn't fully refund opened software, and when proven wrong about that, then claimed they didn't sell games, and when proven wrong about THAT, started whining to the mods that the proof of you being wrong was "off topic".

      And the whole time you were quoting from the very document that proved you were full of shit but you were too stupid to scroll down to see it?

      You really are pathetic, and you calling someone else a dick after that?

      God damn you're not trolling, you really are that stupid.

    9. Re:Stop it. by confused+one · · Score: 1

      OK, but I'm gonna need about 1/2 trillion dollars to get the job done.

    10. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately for all of us, there will likely be plenty of law suits about the result of the campaign. This should result in a new crop of references no matter who the voting machines decide is the winner.

    11. Re:Stop it. by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Find me a fossil and then we'll talk.

      Finding a moist, chocolaty nougat, is the same as finding life.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    12. Re:Stop it. by E++99 · · Score: 1

      "That means there may or may not be life. A fossil would mean there is proof of life."

      A fossil would be a long way from "proof." Since we have no idea what Mars life should look like, unless it happens to look a whole lot like earth life, it would probably be 95% speculation as to whether the fossilized thing had been a form of life.

    13. Re:Stop it. by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the feeling that someone at NASA suffered a traumatic incident as a child, like Adam Sandler in The Water Boy?

      "Hey, these rock formations look pretty interesting"

      "They could be formed by water!"

      "Well, there are number of processes that could leave a similar..."

      "Water! I bet it's water! I'll start writing the press release."

      "It could have been formed by water, but we can't go around telling everyone that..."

      "Water! It was probably the floor of an ancient ocean that was probably teaming with life. Some of that water is probably still there! I'll start writing the press release."

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    14. Re:Stop it. by Paltin · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's sounds nice. However, finding fossils is not going to be easy. First, the relevant rocks on Mars are going to be rare, assuming that life was much more prevalent in the past. Geologic processes work at the surface to grind that surface into dust, meaning that we need to find a lucky outcrop.

      Then, we need to identify something conclusively as a fossil. Single celled organisms don't preserve very well, and the odds of something being preserved is really bad. On the earth, it has taken a long time and a lot of work to find good evidence of early single cellular life. And there are still debates about whether certain morphologies are organic or mineralogic in source. A lot of these questions are solved by pointing to modern microbes that look the same. Of course, with no modern Martian microbes, this line of reasoning is shut down w/o the additional assumption that life on Mars would resemble life on Earth.

      Also, remember that our tools for identifying anything on Mars are absolutely horrible. The rovers are great, but have you tried looking at some of the pictures that come out of them with the intention of identifying things? It's tough. Some recent work has been put into figuring out how good the information collecting of the rovers is by replicating them on the Earth. And uh, the results are not promising.

      Getting a fossil back from mars would be super, duper, mega expensive. It would be dumb as hell to just spend the money. We need to continue looking for small signs that point us in the direction of that possibility, which is exactly what has been going on and exactly what will continue to go on.

    15. Re:Stop it. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I can guarntee that if the earth dried out at that time, that the other poster would not be able to find anything, much less fossils.

      I kid... I kid... I know that wasn't what you meant.

    16. Re:Stop it. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Geologic processes work at the surface to grind that surface into dust, meaning that we need to find a lucky outcrop.

      Geological processes are a lot slower on Mars than they are on Earth. If there was widespread life with hard features that can be fossilized (like bone or a shell), then there will probably be a lot of fossils.

    17. Re:Stop it. by Paltin · · Score: 1

      Three things:

      No one really suspects that life on Mars ever consisted of organisms with hard parts. Remember, on Earth, 4billion years passed with only soft parted organisms before hard parts burst on the scene at the beginning of the Cambrian 543 million years ago.

      Soft parts can be "fossilized".

      These fossilized soft parts, of single celled organisms, can be found on earth. To find them, scientists guess what rocks are likely to contain what they want in the field, take them back to the lab, and look. It's difficult work with a good bit of risk involved. Even if the same kind of fossils exist on Mars, they are likely to be in strata that have been buried and eroded for millions of years, with millions of years of new deposition on top of them. This is not going to be easy.

    18. Re:Stop it. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Find me a fossil and then we'll talk.

      Do you have any idea how long people scoured the Earth before finding and identifying the first fossils there? Finding them here on Mars is not going to be easy, especially using robotic rovers controlled from millions of kilometers away, a method that has yet to find a single fossil on Earth where they are known to exist and humans know what they look like.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  9. Always "possible life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...and possibly life."

    Can't leave that out. Life is so easy to get started that it must have been everywhere there was water.

  10. Mmmmm... by certain+death · · Score: 0

    Nothing like a moist planet to get me going! But really...Why does water signify life? I have seen lakes that were so saline or full of some organism that they could not support life. Like the person up there said...show me some fossils or little green men, or I am not going to fall for it.

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
    1. Re:Mmmmm... by CraftyJack · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have seen lakes that were so saline or full of some organism that they could not support life.

      They were so full of some organism that they could not support life? Yogi Berra, is that you?

    2. Re:Mmmmm... by certain+death · · Score: 1

      Damn...how did you know?!? Sorry...I guess I did a 13th floor on myself there :o)

      --
      "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
    3. Re:Mmmmm... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      or full of some organism that they could not support life.

            Whaaa? Who modded this "informative"? If the lake is "full of an organism", it is supporting life. It might not be the kind of life you'd like to hang out with, but it's life nonetheless.

            As for lakes that are so saline they don't support life, please let me know where they are. Some bacteria THRIVE in ultra-saline conditions and these lakes are full of them. Yeah ok maybe there are no ducks.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Mmmmm... by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      They didn't say *intelligent* life, merely life.

    5. Re:Mmmmm... by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1
      I have seen lakes that were so saline or full of some organism that they could not support life.

      Ummm... organisms are living things, by definition. Utah's Great Salt Lake also has lots of brine shrimp & algae; it's far from lifeless. Just because there aren't creatures scurrying about the martian surface on their 12 tiny green legs is no reason to think that there was never life there.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:Mmmmm... by whatme · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was full of lawyers. Many would claim them to be organisms...but not life. Then again, the same might be said of politicians!

    7. Re:Mmmmm... by smaddox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sea is called "dead" because its high salinity prevents macroscopic aquatic organisms, such as fish and aquatic plants, from living in it, though minuscule quantities of bacteria and microbial fungi are present.

      In times of flood, the salt content of the Dead Sea can drop from its usual 35% salinity to 30% or lower. The Dead Sea temporarily comes to life in the wake of rainy winters. In 1980, after one such rainy winter, the normally dark blue Dead Sea turned red. Researchers from Hebrew University found the Dead Sea to be teeming with a type of algae called Dunaliella. The Dunaliella in turn nourished carotenoid-containing (red-pigmented) halobacteria whose presence is responsible for the color change. Since 1980, the Dead Sea basin has been dry and the algae and the bacteria have not returned in measurable numbers.
      Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea

  11. Re TFA by Smivs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, quite. Now regarding the actual article, what they seem to be saying is that there might have been a longer window for life to develop on Mars. Frankly this was always an unlikely event...Mars is and probably always has been dead. Sad, but true.
    Interesting bit of geology though, and it's amazing what we can find out from these probes.

    1. Re:Re TFA by E++99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now regarding the actual article, what they seem to be saying is that there might have been a longer window for life to develop on Mars. Frankly this was always an unlikely event...Mars is and probably always has been dead.

      Based on what? We have no idea. For all we know it may be virtually impossible for a planet to go 1,000 years with liquid water on its surface without acquiring life.

  12. wonderful by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

    So just send an inflatable biosphere and some bacteria/moss/whatever, at let's see if that rock can still support life if it's given a little help.

    Why wait? A stable biosphere outside of earth orbit would be a monument to humanity. Let's do it.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They want to make absolutely sure there's no native life there, before we transplant our own.

    2. Re:wonderful by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      I don't think taking stuff off our planet is such a good idea, I need that oxygen to breath.

    3. Re:wonderful by chebucto · · Score: 1

      I agree, but I also honestly think there are a lot of people who would be strongly opposed to the idea, for two reasons.

      If life is subsequently found on the planet, it would be much harder to prove that life evolved independently on Mars. The planet would effectively be contaminated. Many people seem to use superlatives like 'most important discovery in history' when discussing finding life (even bacterial life) somewhere else in the universe. Given that there would be no way to go back once life was introduced to mars, I think many people would prefer to wait until more investigation was done.

      I think environmentalists would probably object, too, based on the idea that life may exist there and human meddling may harm it. I don't think this argument caries much weight at all, but our culture seems to have developed an instinctive pessimism about any deliberate large-scale changes to the environment, a feeling that would probably carry over to mars.

      All of this may be moot, however; there's no saying we haven't already introduced life to Mars: although NASA tries their best to keep the rovers clean of bacteria etc. before launch, life tends to find a way (to quote Ian Malcom). There's already speculation that some microbes can survive deep space and reentry, so, who knows?

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    4. Re:wonderful by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If life developed completely independently on Mars, it would be drastically different (on the cellular level) than anything we have here. If life is found on Mars which is cellularly similar to ours, we must conclude that one planet was the source and the other was "contaminated" via rocks or spacecraft or somesuch.

      In short, sending a biosphere to Mars would not do anything to hamper our ability to prove or disprove that life developed independently on Earth and Mars.

      And I doubt "environmentalists" (whatever that means) have the collective will and political power to interfere in NASA missions which don't directly harm particularly-cute animals. Outside of a few parts of California, fanatical environmentalist culture is pretty rare.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:wonderful by camperdave · · Score: 1

      If life developed completely independently on Mars, it would be drastically different (on the cellular level) than anything we have here.

      That is an assumption.

      It may well be a reasonable, and perfectly logical assumption, and it may even be one that I agree with, but until we know under what conditions life starts and what possible forms it could take during its initial stages, it will remain an assumption. For all we know, all life might start out with the radically similar cellular structure.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:wonderful by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      A monument to humanity's stupidity, is more like it. Let's wait and see first if Mars has its own life, and maybe we can study it and learn from it, before we fuck it up and exploit it for all it's worth.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:wonderful by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Considering mitochondria (IIRC) was a separate, self-sufficient single-celled organism before it developed its symbiotic relationship with cells, it seems fantastically unlikely that just such a structure would have developed independent off-world. And that's just one example. [IANAB]

      And at any rate, the practical advantages of having more than one biosphere in the universe far outweigh any intellectual curiosity. One biosphere == a single point of failure for LIFE AS WE KNOW IT!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:wonderful by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      There is clearly no intelligent or even complex life on Mars. Even if it has some subterranean pond-scum, what is there to "fuck up?"

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    9. Re:wonderful by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      If we contaminate Mars before we can ascertain what is there, we may never be able to determine whether any microbial life that may be there originated there, or came from us. We've barely begun to explore, and while we haven't found life yet on the surface, there's plenty of places where it could yet be found.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    10. Re:wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or we can just give Nergal enough funding to go over there and terraform it.

    11. Re:wonderful by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Didn't seem to give a damn about that when they were colonizing the USA. Anyhow, I think there is evidently less and/or less sophisticated life on Mars than there was in the USA a few hundred years ago. Whilst finding it, if it does exist, could be fun, I don't think we should be denying ourselves the expansion that Mars colonies would give us, because of it.

  13. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Wars increase economic activity

    Wars increase economic activity ... needed to wage wars. After a war is over, the economy usually goes to Hell in a Hand-basket, because waging a war has distracted everyone, and other aspects of the economy have been neglected. "Yeah, we built a lot of tanks, and won the war!" ... "But our infrastructure is a shambles."

    And why not? It sure worked wonders for Deep Space Nine and Voyager's ratings!

    After the war was won on Deep Space Nine, the series ended. They never showed what happened afterward: soldiers returning home, demanding jobs, etc.

    But, of course, this "getting-distracted-by-a-war-and-leading-your-economy-to-Hell" can't happen this day and age.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  14. is it ... by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Chewy?

    --
    "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
  15. dyslexia by R2.0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was really excited until I realized it was "moister", not "monster".

    Bummer.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  16. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

    He was being sarcastic... He goes on to talk explicitly about window repairmen and window smashers. I'm certain he understands the fallacy quite well.

  17. Spirit saw this first by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1
    It's an important result that MRO is mapping the global location of hydrated silica across Mars, but it is worth noting that we saw it first with the Spirit Rover, in the site informally tagged "Silica Valley."

    It's been discussed at several recent conferences (AGU, LPSC) and was the main focus of Spirit's scientific research all through the last (Martian) summer.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  18. So, i wonder, if like the Nutty Professor... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    The Moon gets MOIST over Mike Douglas...

    Maybe we can make more, nuttier Mars Bars?

    And, for slogans, we can add to out-of-space ones:

    "A world without fences: Windoze"

    and

    "*I* will use less energy; Human Power"

    or just

    "I will eat less mars"

    "I will sex less"

    and so on... and so on...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  19. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I think you may have forgot the worst case of this: Star Trek: Enterprise.

  20. A fossil would be nice by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

    Then we could put to rest all of the hysteria associated with religion. Life happened twice in this solar system, why didn't your god tell you guys about his other try? I can just imagine the hand wringing and apologetics.

    1. Re:A fossil would be nice by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Only a few religions have the one-true-world concept. Not all of them have the god concept, either.

  21. A Mars Monster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG! Everyone run! The Mars Monsters are real!

    A what? Oh. A Moister Mars. Never mind.

  22. Moist?? by CaptSaltyJack · · Score: 1

    "Moist" is just one of those words that is automatically associated with one other particular word, usually sexual in nature. "Pert" is another.

    I just had to make that comment. It was either that, or "mmm, a moister, chewier Mars."

  23. Fixed :Stop it. by Paltin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fixed version:

    What do you mean by fossil? Life on earth was consisting of creatures equally complex to bacteria for approximately 4 billion years, and these organisms are tough to find and difficult to identity

  24. Commericial viabile minerals? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Researchers examining data from the orbiter's Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars have found evidence of hydrated silica, commonly known as opal.

    Hydrated silica doesn't sound like much, but I think most people understand what opal is. Granted, you're not going to fund a Mars mission with opals. Wikipedia says the largest uncut opal on *this* planet, the size of a fist, is worth "just" $1.2 million. You'd have to haul back several thousand of them, and pretend you didn't just turn supply-and-demand on its ear.

    But surely there's going to be more than just pretty rocks out there. A big vein of gold, with no environmental concerns, might be a boon for semiconductor manufacturers (even if it does put a bunch of commodities traders out on the street). Better yet, finding a big patch of tantalum would put some particularly nasty dictators out of business.

    Of course, those elements would be much easier to mine from a passing asteroid. But you've got to go to Mars for the opals.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Commericial viabile minerals? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Even if you do it bulk, the cost per ounce to fly gold from Mars to Earth is much, much, much higher than the value of gold. Or any other mineral.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  25. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he got it to outerspace, albeit a fictitious version thereof.

  26. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by camperdave · · Score: 1

    In the minds of many people Enterprise doesn't count as Star Trek.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  27. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Which Star Trek?
    Enterprise was the pick of the new litter IMHO.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  28. Everybody into the pool! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Last one's a rotten martian egg!

  29. Holes and Juices. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    Does mars also have holes and juices?

    And has not nasa now added probes to the holes and juices?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  30. Lifeless and Wet is Better by fartrader · · Score: 1

    The evidence is mounting that early mars from the Noachian period and perhaps later (3.8 billion years ago give or take) was extremely wet - you only have to look at the MOLA data set to draw *a* conclusion that the Northern polar regions were a single vast ocean, either that or the 4km+ deep depression was caused by a huge impact. Evidence of the "coastline" can be interpreted as a receding shoreline or something more cataclysmic - depends on who you read and believe.

    Clearly later periods with channels that show large water outflows demonstrate that water is still there, perhaps in considerable quantities just below the surface as permafrost.

    The bottom line, an awesome boon to us all-colonizing all-conquering humans. Finding evidence of life, even fossilized, would just complicate the picture. Life, especially the microscopic kind, can thrive in really cold environments for extremely long periods as Antarctica demonstrates. I'd really just like my descendants to have the water, the possibilities it opens up, and not have to worry about wiping out some tenacious, unique alien lifeform.

  31. Tough choice by Katatsumuri · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Let me see... Historical interest... Or better chance of survival for life as we know it... Interest... Or life... Argh, I hate tough choices like that!

    In all seriousness, we can build colonies first, and analyze historical evidence later. It's not as if we couldn't tell ancient material from current life here on Earth.

  32. A fossil? by gillbates · · Score: 1

    As if a fossil would prove anything. First you'll ask for a fossil, then you'll demand that there be no gaps in the fossil record... Honestly, where will your skepticism end?!

    I hate to say it, but you're not following the blind faith of science. Are you sure you're feeling okay? Next thing you know, you could be denying the theory of evolution based on the lack of evidence, and other crazy things.

    Are you sure you're feeling okay?

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  33. Re:Here's how it's going to play out by tibman · · Score: 1

    I truely enjoyed Enterprise. A storyline that actually progressed from episode to episode *gasp*

    DS9 developed a good storyline, but wow it took a few seasons. Voyager felt like a continuous story because at the end of the episode Janeway would say, "Tom, set a course for home." But rarely did a plot stretch more than a few episodes. But seriously, DS9's dominion war and Voyager's whole borg thing saved those shows.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman