Slashdot Mirror


Secondlight, Microsoft's New Surface Prototype

Barence writes "Microsoft has literally added another dimension to its touchscreen table technology Surface. The new table projects an image through the table itself, so that any translucent material (such as tracing paper or perspex) held above the Surface screen displays a different image to what you see on the table's display. This means you can have a satellite image of a town on the table, and have the street names projected on to a piece of paper that the user holds above the map. Or you could have a photo of a car, with the tracing paper displaying images of its innards."

43 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Re:How long by Divebus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any 3D viruses for it yet?

    --

    Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
  2. Re:How long by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they're presenting it then you can be assured that it is already patent pending.

    Which means its been in the lab for about 2 years already.. so in another 8 it might be on the market - but it'll be (more) boring by then, so it won't.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. Right... by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... it can display a second image that is completely invisible unless I hold a piece of paper in front of it.

    Is it just me or does that sound kind of silly?

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    1. Re:Right... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Seriously. I like the idea of doing research for the sake of research, and I would probably respect this more, except Microsoft keeps representing it as
      1. The coolest thing they have ever come up with.
      2. The future of computing.

      and it is neither, it is just cool research. It's so cute the way Microsoft has gotten all senile and out of touch in its old age.

      OK, off to do laundry now. When will they make a robot that does my laundry for me? Now THAT will be progress.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Right... by Perseid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was what I thought when I first saw a computer mouse. Do I expect this will revolutionize computing? Maybe, but probably not. Does that mean it's not cool? Naw, it's cool and my inner geek wants one. It's good to see Microsoft is indeed trying to make new stuff. That's more than we can say about them a lot of the time.

    3. Re:Right... by Swizec · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, off to do laundry now. When will they make a robot that does my laundry for me? Now THAT will be progress.

      It's called a washing machine.

    4. Re:Right... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe it could be profoundly useful.

      Expand the size to that of a conference table or put it up as a white board(as shown in the episode of SNL with the fake Sarah palin skit) and grab a team of engineers to brainstorm and manipulate UML and other diagrams in real time in front of a live studio audience(shareholders: "ooooh! ahhhhh!")

      Sure beats dry-erase markers or e-mailing small-ass graphic files back and forth.

    5. Re:Right... by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's talking about a folding machine, and it would truly be a great invention. Just dump in the laundry and out comes a folded pile. Bonus if it sorts socks!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    6. Re:Right... by Swizec · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called a wife.

    7. Re:Right... by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, come on. The potholes aren't THAT deep!

    8. Re:Right... by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you considered the Total Cost of Ownership?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Right... by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would suspect it can handle an image with a great number of layers, where the user could pick any one to be the layer that is projected through the first surface onto the upper surface. As quickly as a Photoshop type programs can manipulate layers, there are some real organizational uses for this. Any time you have a large group of people who need to schedule something complex together, being able to piecemeal copy many bits of information onto someone's basic instructions is handy, and that could certainly include paper.
            For example, if you run a business, you are probably going to print employee schedules at least now and then. Imagine if a trainee employee wants to know who the most experienced fellow employee available is if he runs into something above his training. You could flick through the other schedule layers while they are projected onto his schedule, letting him make a few notes on his copy.
              If there's already some printing on his copy, then what he adds by tracing will end up lined up with it if the rest is still lined up, so this prevents a lot of minor mistakes, such as copying a schedule change into the wrong box. In the same way, just about any minor change could be made swiftly, and with a reduced error rate, IF that change only needs to be copied by a few people. Obviously, if the same change or info needs to be added to 50 people's notes, it's faster in most cases to just tear up the old copies and reprint, but in a complex business the typical weekly meeting results mostly in changes that are simple and/or needed by only a few employees, so for a well organized business, where major changes don't often come up in short range planning, this will be useful. For less well organized business which buy it expecting it to help, when they make massive readjustments to policies and schedules just a few days out, this system won't help after all, and they are likely to be disappointed.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    10. Re:Right... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this particular instance.. it's called a maid.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:Right... by MrMr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bonus if it sorts socks!
      Fixed that years ago: choose the kind of socks you like best and standardize. I can now even throw away a single sock without looking for the other one...

  4. Hooray! by Centurix · · Score: 5, Funny

    A bigger ass table!

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Hooray! by dwarg · · Score: 2, Funny
  5. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been blocking video projectors with objects to annoy my teachers for years. I claim prior art!

  6. Re:How long by Fourier404 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...since when did companies routinely invest in research and then give the results away for free, unless there was some other way to make money off it?

  7. Re:I dont mean to be rude, or anti progress.. but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone on Slashdot except for you.

  8. My company by Datamonstar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is actually laying off people as a result of the supposed economic crisis and yet still wasting away resources on Surface. We're wasting money on this crap because our new manager wants to be all "trendy" and make us look like some sort of cutting age IT outfit. I'd rather us keep on doing what we already do and have been highly profitable at instead of wasting time and money on this type of toy product and ruining people's lives in the process. There were some people who found out they were loosing their job by watching the evening news, but we still have enough money to buy and maintain electronic tables. Horrible.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:My company by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every good employee you have is an already selected and prescreened applicant for other jobs you might need done. He or she is already familiar with the company, knows many of the other employees, and you've already completed a bunch of paperwork on them. If he or she were lazy or inefficient or crooked, presumably you would have fired them, not waited until there was an excuse to lay them off. When you lay them off, they go elsewhere, and then when you need another job done, you have to pick from a bunch of unscreened applicants, fill out new paperwork, train somebody in the basics of your corporate culture, and re-incur a lot of costs you already paid once. Doing a lot of layoffs is basically committing to shrink for months after the cause of the layoffs ends, months in which a smart competitor may grow. Something like increases in efficiency should mean your company will grow, and therefore need more people in the long run. Layoffs there are the same as betting your increased efficiency won't, by itself, improve your bottom line.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  9. What's the advantage over doing it in software? by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems pointless to me.

    If this functionality is useful, why couldn't you just have the software display a rectangle that you can drag across the screen that affects what is displayed within the rectangle?

    Then it's always available regardless of whether you happen to have a nearby supply of tracing paper with the proper translucency characteristics.

    And then it's equally visible with the main image, from all angle and lighting conditions, because it is in fact the main image.

    Actually I don't understand why you'd only want street names displayed only with a small rectangular area, rather than toggling them on and off across the entire image.

    1. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by blankinthefill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA: "Using an infrared camera, the secondary "display" can also be used as a multitouch surface. What's more, it can display video." In conjunction with the part where you can use the TRANSLUCENT MATERIAL (doesn't HAVE to be PAPER)to see inside of something who's outsides are displayed on the main screen (ala their car example) I could actually see this being pretty damn useful. Besides, many many many things are invented that don't seem useful until someone thinks outside the box with them, then wallah, magic shit happens! Honestly, I could see this being useful for a number of things right now, and I'll be the first to admit that I am not really a very good innovator.

  10. new warning stickers by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Do not stare into table with remaining eye."

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  11. Re:How long by MiKM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure some of the technology they developed for this is deserving of a patent (I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to patent some trivial/frivolous stuff, though). Patents aren't always bad, even for big corporations.

  12. Glyph Tracking by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like pretty standard form of glyph tracking, similar to those outlandish "magic boards" the news networks seem to like playing around with to beguile the audience with more of the shiny.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  13. Re:I dont mean to be rude, or anti progress.. but. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's bitter beacuse he's dyslexic, and to add insult to injury he name himself "moniker" when he meant to type "monkier".

  14. HOW FRIGGING COOL!!! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now, I can display one image on the large-format table, while I struggle to manually hold a 36" x 48" piece of frigging tracing paper a few inches over it, thereby rendering the tracing-paper image impractical, and the other image invisible!

    Damn! Why didn't I think of that?? I would be RICH!!!

    Rich, I tell you!

    1. Re:HOW FRIGGING COOL!!! by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you can set the paper directly onto the table.

      And use a transparency, allowing you to see the bottom image as well. Not that this seems incredibly useful to me in the described application, but it could become an interesting capability.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  15. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's what I want to know.

    Clearly I'm missing something obvious, but other than looking cool, is there any practical advantage to this?

    It would seem that the very thing that makes it look cool -- that "added dimension" -- is also going to mean that the way in which the images are superimposed varies depending on where you're standing. The only way the roads in that "road map" idea would be in the right place is if you were hovering directly over the table -- except you'd be blocking the projector, and it still wouldn't be right towards the edges of the table.

    I mean, I get the point of Surface itself. I do. What I don't get is what value this other layer has over doing the same thing in software.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  16. Re:How long by capnkr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look at the pic with TFA. There, behind the pretty flowers, revealed only by use of the Magic Translucent Paper, are what appear to be....
     
    Frickin' sharks with frickin' lasers on their frickin' heads!
     
    Apparently, Dr. Evil Ballmer has some type of plan to make MILLIONS off of this new technology...

    --
    "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
  17. I know this! by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is Unix!

  18. Come on guys.... by Idiomatick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its fucking cool technology. Don't let fanboyism ruin this. Its a big table, its expensive. But its still fucking cool. Have you forgotten you are nerds? Who gives a shit how useful it is? Aren't people always arguing pro research that isn't about making a buck. Now when 'evil' microsoft does something all nerds like (making cool shit without having purely profit in mind) what happens? You bash it? I expect better :S

  19. Re:How long by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dunno, the actual technology seems really simple. But on the other hand it is rather innovative and I'ce never seen it before. Anyways it's a hell of alot more deserving then alot of the other patents that get handed out these days.

    --
    I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  20. what about tent surface prototypes by heroine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making computer screens out of $10,000 coffee tables for $2,000,000 home refinancers is so 2006. It's time for tent screen prototypes for the renters.

  21. Re:How long by JoCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, but there are some pop-ups.

  22. Re:How long by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    did you even RTFA? oh wait this is quantumG....

    this is pretty cool stuff, it allows the user to display an image on the table of say a building, and different people (say engineers working on different sections like plumbing and electrical) can throw on their own parts of the plans to see if they are going to conflict and to easily show others. having actually worked on large projects where one of the biggest hurdles is inter discipline co operation i can see a real use for this.

    if this was apple developing it i'm guessing you'd all be masturbating over it by now.....

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  23. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only way the roads in that "road map" idea would be in the right place is if you were hovering directly over the table -- except you'd be blocking the projector, and it still wouldn't be right towards the edges of the table.

    The projector projects from under the table using alternate frames on the surface. By applying current or not, the surface is either translucent or transparent, thus the second image projects through while the first remains on the table surface itself. If you're standing directly over it, you're in a perfect spot to see it and nothing gets blocked.

    The cool thing about not doing it in software is that you can have the extra layer be a piece of translucent plastic on top of the surface... or you can hold it a few feet up. The second projector can then focus on where you're holding it to project a sharp image. If you do this in software, you'll end up holding a blank, unlit object while the second image is superimposed on the surface, obscuring the main image and negating the benefits of a third dimension. Because of the alternating frames and the second projector, you see an unimpeded original image on the surface and an unimpeded second image on the object you're holding.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  24. Re:Alternate Site? by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was thinking that this pulls computing out of the display. It even pulls computing out of the touch part. You could have a chip in your pocket that the system reads and transforms any room you walk into a themed 60s room. You could have it detect people in a theatre so when they stand up the movie display correctly on them so they don't block your view. You could eliminate flexible screens and flexible paper by displaying on a recognizable material, recognized by the manner in which it is held. I could get on the subway and read the New York Times on a napkin because my thumb and forefinger are positioned correctly. Board meetings would never be the same. No more projectors, no more passing out stapled reports. Although very rudimentary, this is a step towards developing a holodeck. I was most impressed by the ability to track gestures at a distance. This is a giant leap towards eliminating the mouse and keyboard. Screw the touch screen. I want the computer to interpret anything I touch. Did you watch the demonstration?

    http://research.microsoft.com/sendev/video/SecondLight.wmv

    I'll get modded into oblivion. It is taboo to speak imaginatively and positively about a Microsoft product on Slashdot.

  25. Re:Alternate Site? by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Funny
    What intelligent ideas do you want?

    Any would be a good start.

    Basically most people are saying what they think about the thing, or telling what they think through humor

    Which I find overly predictable. Although the topics may be news for nerds or stuff that matters, the discussions are only karma whoring, Microsoft bashing, and +5 funny. I'm frustrated because Slashdot used to be filled with posts from engineers. Slashdot used to be the Scientific American of discussion groups. Now it's like Digg only geared towards Microsoft bashing rather than the Apple fan site that is iDigg. I understand that people don't like Microsoft, I just find it more difficult each day searching though the +5 funny or the M$ posts trying to find the intelligent content of days past.

    Linux Rocks! There... Mod me up.

  26. Re:How long by MrMr · · Score: 2, Informative

    My guess: since the dawn of time
    Apparently they only stopped doing so in 1623.

  27. Re:How long by durnurd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except, of course, every time you come in, you have to enunciate "honey Mustard, not honey Roasted", and she still can't find the Honey Mustard Chicken button on the cash register, even though you're staring right at it, and you've ordered it before, and you've seen her press it before.

    I'll take the table.

    --
    --Edward Dassmesser
  28. IR Sensors make the paper irrelevant by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is cool technology, but if it can sense the location of IR-reflective objects on the table it doesn't need to actually project anything onto the paper. You could simply lay a frame on the table so it could sense the corners of the frame, then composite the image onto the display as if the frame was a sheet of paper. Then the transparency of the paper can be handled in software, you don't need the special surface, and you can have as many "sheets of paper" as you want.

    Projecting onto objects above the table is cool, but not super practical. The "IR Mouse" is really more interesting.