Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War

With under a week to go, we're opening up discussions on the US Presidential Election. Yesterday we discussed the economy. Today we take on one of the other major election topics: The War. From the actual wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, to foreign policy issues related to potential threats like North Korea, Russia, and Iran, how do the candidates stack up?

Comments

Comment removed

[account_deleted]

Comment removed based on user account deletion

Re:Iraq

[DougF]

There is no harm talking to them...

There will be serious repercussions from talking with terrorist states without preconditions. The President of the United States of America is the single person recognized as the "leader" of the world. To give credence and authority to leaders of Iran, North Korea, Syria, etc by engaging in one-on-one talks is foolhardy. It sets apart the rest of the team of nations working to contain these rogue states as not worthy of inclusion. One-on-one talks set up the possibility of "end-runs" where these terrorist states can get around international agreements designed to force cooperation or at least claim the U.S. offered concessions when none were proffered. And lastly, these tete-a-tete talks trap the President in multiple meetings that would serve no purpose but that of Iran, Syria, and North Korea when the President should be leading a team of nations at any talks to ensure everyone's interest is protected.

This is precisely why President Bush was absolutely right in insisting that any talks with North Korea occur in a regional framework, where the interests of Russia, China, Japan, and South Korea were all represented, and the North Koreans could not turn the meeting into a monologue of grievances against the U.S. Despite years of stalling and wriggling, the North Koreans finally had to come to the table, deal with their neighbors, and work out an agreement that everyone could live with.

Mark my words, Obama is another JFK, whose inexperience at dealing with other nations will get the U.S. into another crisis comparable to the Cuban Missile Crisis and will probably get us involved in another VietNam. And as Nixon had to clean up JFK/LBJ's mess in VietNam, and Bush '43 had to clean up Clinton's debacle in Iraq, it will take a Republican president to end the mess a President Obama will create.

Military left

[huckamania]

We never should have stayed in Iraq, we should have taken a left turn and over ran Iran. We would have been home by Christmas. Airdrop beer into key areas and the Marines will kill anyone between them and their suds.

Everyone still acts shocked about the war. If you had paid attention you would remember Bush referencing the Axis of Evil. He did exactly what he said he would do. It wasn't a con job. He told everyone from the start what he was gonna do. Iraq, having been under a previous cease fire agreement that they repeatedly violated, was just the easiest to start sumthin wit, after Afghanistan of course. Sadaam was one of if not the largest supporter of terrorism back when he ruled Iraq. Now it's Iran. If Bush had balls, he'd take on Iran before leaving office.

For the slashdot crowd, it's the money spent on the war that matters the most, then it's the reputation of the US in the world (haha), then maybe those poor Iraqi casualties (over-inflated, of course) and to top it off, it was all our fault to begin with. Sad, pathetic, basement dwellers.