Slashdot Mirror


Poll Finds 23 Percent of Texans Think Obama is Muslim

A University of Texas poll has found that 23 percent of Texans are convinced that Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama is a Muslim. Only 45 percent of the people polled correctly identified Obama as a Protestant Christian. Nationwide, the number of people who believe in the "Secret Muslim Conspiracy" is about the same as those who believe that the moon landing was faked (5-10 percent), which makes the high numbers in Texas unusual.

27 of 562 comments (clear)

  1. Well, as they say... by joggle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Texas is a whole 'nother country.

    They have great ice cream (Blue Bell), great water parks (Schlitterbahn), nice lakes and neat caverns. But they also have a lot of insular communities in the country (I grew up in one...not fun if you disagree with the pack/herd).

  2. And even if he was by typidemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does it matter you bigoted, hateful bastards?

    1. Re:And even if he was by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Catholicism is nutty (I was raised in the Church), but there is nothing in modern-day Catholicism (esp. as practiced in the USA, as it is different than that practiced elsewhere; US catholics tend to ignore things they don't agree with, such as the prohibition on contraception) which requires a theocracy. In fact, I can't think of a single Christian-dominated country which could be called a theocracy, though many, many countries are Christian-dominated. The same is not true for Islam; it is an integral part of that religion that the government be a theocracy, and that infidels pay a tribute.

      As for transforming the US into a Sharia Law state, there is nothing irrational about that at all. Have you been asleep for the past 8 years? Have you ever heard of an Executive Order? The President can make any new law he wants and enforce it. No one can stop him; he's the executive and the commander-in-chief. The Supreme Court could issue a ruling, but who's going to enforce it? Andrew Jackson showed the futility of that.

  3. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by joggle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Boy, that's easy. Let me count the ways:

    Most people agreed with Greenspan that derivatives shouldn't be regulated. Greenspan himself no longer has that view (and he's a staunch libertarian).

    Most people (in America) thought there were WMDs in Iraq before the invasion.

    Most people opposed the $700 billion bailout. I've yet to find a serious economist or capitalist who believes that no action was a valid alternative--we were a hair away from a complete financial halt in the credit/security market which would have quickly halted our entire economy. But, of course, most people haven't taken basic economic courses (much less advanced ones).

    And so on. This is why we don't live in a pure Democracy but elect our peers to lead the rest of us for a number of years--the majority isn't always right.

  4. woah woah woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stop the judgment bus there buddy!

    I don't like Muslim *ideology*.

    I don't like the idea that I must submit to Allah. Does this make me hateful? A bigot?

    The President has the ability to veto and make decisions, and these in turn affect me, you and the world. What is his or her ideology? Are they pro women's rights? A Muslim, holding to Sharia law, sees women as less-than-human.

    I can't support such an ideology.

    1. Re:woah woah woah by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A Muslim, holding to Sharia law, sees women as less-than-human.

      I can't support such an ideology.

      A Christian, holding to the values espoused in the New Testament, sees women similarly.

          Luckily, the FSM has a place for all in his noodly sauce.

    2. Re:woah woah woah by CSMatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I don't like the idea that I must submit to Allah. Does this make me hateful? A bigot?"

      Which is why the Constitution prohibits a state religion. And at any rate, the President does not legitimately have the power to declare law, only enforce it.

      "The President has the ability to veto and make decisions, and these in turn affect me, you and the world. What is his or her ideology? Are they pro women's rights? A Muslim, holding to Sharia law, sees women as less-than-human."

      Is this much different from the fundamentalist Christain view that women belong in the home (a view that itself is far more moderate compared to what the Bible says about women's rights)? Just like everyone doesn't agree with the Christain fundamentalists yet still claims to believe in the religion, not everyone who labels themselves as Muslim necessarily has the same strict interpretation. Not to mention that if this kind of thing does happen, the President risks losing his or her re-election because of the small amount of Muslims in the country, many of which might not even agree with his or her specific ideology.

    3. Re:woah woah woah by MicktheMech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you're reading a different New Testament than I am.

  5. I guess I'm not suprised by iamthelinuxguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The tide is turning. I've been a Texan all my life. Conservative talk radio dominates the AM dial and like they say...garbage in...garbage out. I'm constantly amazed how blindly my neighbors follow the party line. Lies and innuendo are accepted as fact. I hate to admit it, but the Christian Conservative movement has turned the whole fight into an us-against-them battle and it's impossible to make rational arguments when it's gotten to that level. There are those of us here that see the absurdity and will be voting for Obama. I don't agree with everything he stands for. Illegal immigration is a huge issue here. We don't really understand why politicians don't stand up for the American worker. Our jobs are being de-valued by workers who come here and will accept a non-living wage for most Americans. Our federal government hands out money hand over fist for welfare, health benefit and education to people that have no legal right to be here. Other than that, I agree with Obama's plans completely. The myth that the market will take care of itself has finally been debunked and hopefully we will get some sane regulation put back in place. I hope we can bring our troops back home and balance the budget. I hope we can do something about health care. I hope we can do something about our reliance on foreign oil. I hope we can help the unfortunate here at home that have slipped through the cracks due to our own selfishness. I believe that Obama is our best hope for a better future...and as a native Texan...he has my vote.

    1. Re:I guess I'm not suprised by segedunum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I feel for you. Man, those Christian fundamentalists have really screwed up conservative values. I'm a Christian myself, and I think we can all agree that some spiritual grounding and much of the stuff in the Bible are good things.

      The problem I have with the Christian Conservatives is they display little in the way of Christian understanding and compassion, and the way they literally interpret the Bible and think they are good Christians scares the shit out of me. Dare I say it, they sound just as bad, if not worse, than the Islamic fundamentalists they rail against.

    2. Re:I guess I'm not suprised by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dare I say it, they sound just as bad, if not worse, than the Islamic fundamentalists they rail against.

      It's fundementalism / extremism that is the brain fart, it doesn't really matter what religion or ideology they've latched on to.

      It was an epiphany that came when I realized that people who dig up bad shit in the quran are actively looking for bad shit which they can use to justify hating muslims. They are just the other side of the coin of islamic fundamentalists who dig up the same bad shit in the quran so that they can justify hating non-muslims.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:I guess I'm not suprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe if we stopped paying people to not work (welfare), we could put those people to work doing crap jobs like picking cabbage.

  6. Forget black or female president... by thenewguy001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I dream of the day when an atheist/agnostic person can be elected to the presidency; when a candidate's religious orientation does not matter; when we can truly have separation of church and state.

    1. Re:Forget black or female president... by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "when we can truly have separation of church and state."

      Church demands control of state because Deity must rule man (conveniently enough, through his human representatives).

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  7. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quoting the austrian school in serious economic discussions is like quoting creationists or flat-earthers. It's pseudo-science to a degree that real economists are embarrassed by them.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  8. Truth Revealed by Jekler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If nothing else, this year's campaigns have shown me how easily manipulated the general public is. It's not just people in Texas, but close friends of mine. I can't even vocalize how shocked I was to have someone I always believed to be an intelligent person confide in me his belief that Barack Obama is a "secret Muslim".

    I can't believe how often and with how much confidence I see pundits, news anchors, editors, and journalists make claims about one candidate and simultaneously brush off exactly the same claim about their favored candidate. I mean to watch Bill Kristol essentially say, with a smile on his face, "It's only socialist if a Democrat does it." or "They're only radical associates if we're talking about Barack Obama." and then brush off the entire conversation the moment Palin's associations are mentioned.

    It makes me think of one of Dr. Phil's favorite phrases "Right Fighters". They don't want to do what works, they want to be right. 95% of the people in this country wouldn't care if the candidate they've chosen blew up the whole fucking world, they'd never admit to being wrong. They'd just smile as their skin boiled off and say "Yeah, well your guy would have been worse."

    I'm ashamed to even participate in this process. I'm ashamed to be saddled with the burden of even having to share a species with Sean Hannity. I don't want the other species of the world to make the mistake of thinking we've got anything in common. More than anything else, I think this election has just made me feel hugely ashamed. It doesn't matter who wins, humanity already lost.

    The political interests now directly control the media. Journalists aren't even reporting or investigating anymore, they work for lobbyists and politicians while pretending to be informing the people. It's sad that comedians like Jon Stewart are so much closer to reporting reality than Fox News or CNN. As I'm sure everyone has now watched, they discussed Marsha Brady on CNN like she's a real person. That's what this whole thing is about. People who can't differentiate between reality and fantasy. Of course so many people believe Obama is a secret Muslim, anyone who thinks the Brady Bunch is a documentary is prone to believe anything.

    1. Re:Truth Revealed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt you're really interested in expanding your mind but, since I feel like taking a break from work, I'll venture to suggest a slightly less simple-minded world view.

      The difference between Christians, Jews, and Muslims is seen in the differences in the countries in which they're dominant.

      Really? So would you care to elaborate on the difference between the Philippines (dominated by Christians) and Indonesia (dominated by Muslims)?

      ... I don't see anyone trying to force the worst parts of fundamentalist Christianity on everyone by law and succeeding.

      That may depend on your definition of worst.

      Let's start with a well-known, but rather trivial, example: clothes. There are a couple Muslim countries in the world that require women to wear burkas. Pretty bad, right? Clothes are a matter of individual freedom, right? So, try walking around naked in the USA. See how far you get before you're a convicted sex offender facing a lifetime of severe persecution. We talk about the USA and all of a sudden clothes are a matter of community standards (rather than individual freedom). Oh, the problem in the Muslim countries is discrimination: that they have different dress standards for men and women? Well, try walking around topless in the USA as a woman and see how far you get.

      But let's move on to a more serious example: forcing your religion on other people. It turns out that there are young men that live such limited lives that they conclude that their own culture and religion is so superior to other religions and cultures that it must imposed on people in foreign countries by force. So, these young men travel to other countries and kill people in those other countries in an attempt to force them to adopt the "superior" culture and religion. How many simple-minded young men from the USA are currently killing people in the Middle East in an attempt to force people in the Middle East to adopt a more American culture and religion? A couple hundred thousand - quite a few. Now, how many people from the Middle East are killing people in the USA in an attempt to force people in the USA to adopt a more Middle Eastern culture and religion. Not very many. Maybe a few dozen - depending how you count.

      But let's take a step back and look at the specific situation in the Middle East. You've got a bunch of immigrants from Europe and the USA who have moved to the Middle East, driven out most of the locals and set up a country that is explicitly proclaimed to be a country for an ethnic group of people other than most people in the Middle East. At present, this new little country of European and American immigrants has set up a system very similar to South African apartheid to beat up on the locals.

      Why? A lot of it has to do with certain aspects of fundamentalist Christian and Jewish religions. The Jewish fundamentalists believe they were given the land by their god. The fundamentalist Christians believe that they've got to set this little country up to bring about some kind of apocalyptic "end-times" scenario.

      Either way, to people in the Middle East, it looks like they're getting beat up on by people who are drawn to the worst aspects of Christianity and Judaism. Of course, if I've convinced you of the evils of religion generally, you might try going to live in one of the last remaining communist countries that favors atheism: say, North Korea.

  9. Re:Not Muslim, but... by samkass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, he's not Muslim, but his attending a rather radical black theology church with a rather strange pastor combined with other "interesting" seeming Muslim-sympathetic beliefs or actions do seem to point to a non-full disclosure of his beliefs, etc.

    Um, you haven't read his book, have you? The first one, titled "Dreams from my Father", describes in detail how he was referred to Rev. Wright's church and what it meant to him, and described his transition from being Christian only in name to acquiring a belief system. The second one, "The Audacity of Hope", was named after the name of the first sermon he heard at Rev Wright's church and discusses the progression of his thinking and approach to government and belief. He may be accused of a lot of things, but lack of full disclosure CAN NOT be one of them. His entire life is, quite literally, an open book available for all to read.

    Obama is the type of person who can freely discuss ideas with a great variety of people without adopting them. He especially values differing opinions, which I like as something that will help prevent any "failures of imagination" in his administration. Rev. Wright to him was a focal point for many disparate beliefs and influences, and despite some incendiary language helped him see many issues more clearly. In other words, Rev Wright was more of a lens than the source of light for Obama (at least that's my impression from his books).

    I think this is why McCain has rightly shied away from challenging Obama's beliefs. Because they actually are one of Obama's strengths, especially compared to McCain's own.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  10. Real question by SupremoMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many of the 23% think that him being a Muslim would be a problem? There is difference between being uninformed and being a bigot.

  11. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Give me a break. Why is it that any time someone disagrees with someone they call the other person a liar? There is a difference between being wrong and lying you know. This sort of rhetoric is what makes it impossible to have a debate on anything these days. It reminds me of how a child argues.

  12. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by Flavio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Give me a break. Why is it that any time someone disagrees with someone they call the other person a liar? There is a difference between being wrong and lying you know.

    Because his association of austrian economics and flat-earthers was an obvious attempt to deceive. His comment never had an argument based on logic, science or history which could only pass as "wrong", because it wasn't the product of an honest mistake. It was a demonstrably false attempt to ridicule which deserved to be called upon.

    I'm not going to tip toe around this matter just for the sake of being politically correct.

  13. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It reminds me of how a child argues"

    As a person who used to be a child I strongly disagree. Most children argue nonsensically as do most adults. Being nonsensical is not inherently childlike but is just a part of the human condition. Adults merely have the education to make their nonsensical arguments more elaborate.

  14. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by tuxgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obama did refuse to put his hand ofer his heart
    and he did refuse to wear flag lapels when everyone else was doing it

    I really don't know why everybody is making such an issue over this shit.

    Putting your hand over your heart during the PoA isn't a requirement in any manual I've seen. Most of us have just been programmed to do this from when we were young, but if you think about it, it's just a superficial gesture. Some do it, & some don't. Get over it!

    As for the lapel pin, that is a republican thing. They thought it up. It also means absolutely nothing. It is almost sacrilege the way they make such an issue over it too. Considering how badly they have fucked the country up over the past 12 years.
    I don't wear a lapel pin. I'm sure you don't either. Can we let it all go now and just keep moving forward?

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
  15. Houston, we have a problem.... by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    23% of the Texas population are morons.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  16. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by otopico · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps it is time we stop being robots and realize that wearing of a flag or posing in a certain way during a song or some bullshit feel good 'pledge' is nothing more than a motion. If a person not putting their hand over some internal organ makes you wonder about that person's patriotism or 'respect' for traditions, it seems it says more about you than them. Questioning a person's decisions because of that makes you look like a simpleton. But at least you aren't alone. I guess intentional ignorance truly is bliss.

    Questioning anyone's patriotism and deciding it isn't as genuine or as true as yours is one of the foundations of fascism.

    Sorry, but too many people have died to let ignorant people take us down that road.

  17. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hard to call it paranoia, when Whitey rigs a legal system that puts 12 percent of black men in 20s and early 30s behind bars.

    America is a bigger racist prison state than South Africa ever was -It just has better public relations because the bloody Boers are in the majority.

    If all you ever read is WHITE men's opinions of BLACK life and reality, I am sure you will consider yourself informed. But you will never KNOW.

    Signed,
    A LOVE Supreme.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  18. Re:How could 63% of people be wrong? by Darby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And no, it is not jingoism in any way.

    Actually, that's exactly what it is. Patriotism is loving your country. Wearing a flag pin has no bearing on that, and given that it is the Republicans who have been making a big deal about it and pushing the idea that not wearing one makes one less patriotic and the Republicans have been actively engaged in treason the entire time, it's damn obvious that wearing a stupid fucking pin has nothing to do with patriotism. Refusing to wear one on the grounds that it associates you with traitors *is* a patriotic act.

    So, yes, all it is is jingoism. You haven't said anything that would counter that fact.

    If you think wearing stupid pins is patriotism, you're an idiot and I have to ask, why do you hate America so much that you'd try and sell ignorant empty gestures as patriotic?