Slashdot Mirror


Linux Supports More Devices Than Any Other OS

Linux Blog recommends an interview up on the O'Reilly site with Greg Kroah-Hartman, long-time Linux kernel hacker and the current Linux kernel maintainer for the USB driver core. He updates the free Linux driver program announced almost two years ago, which has really caught traction now with more than 300 developers volunteering. The interviewer begins by asking about Kroah-Hartman's claim that the Linux kernel now supports more devices than any other operating system ever has. "[One factor is] the ease of writing drivers; Linux drivers are at normally one-third smaller than Windows drivers or other operating system drivers. We have all the examples there, so it's trivial to write a new one if you have new hardware, usually because you can copy the code and go. We maintain them... forever, so the old ones don't disappear and we run on every single processor out there. I mean Linux is 80% of the world's top 500 super computers right now and we're also the number one embedded operating system today. We've got both sides of the market because it's — yeah it's pretty amazing. I don't know why, but we're doing something right."

6 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. LEARN TO SPELL IF YOU TAG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Could someone please tell me what retard keeps tagging with misspelled words? "!suprise", indeed!

  2. Functionality.. by Computershack · · Score: -1, Troll
    "[One factor is] the ease of writing drivers; Linux drivers are at normally one-third smaller than Windows drivers "

    Yeah because they have nowhere near the same level of functionality as the Windows ones.

    --
    I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
  3. partial functionallity doesn't count. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    sure the hardware may work, but only partially.

    eg. i can't get my hp dc5800 (2007 desktop) with a nvidia quadro nv290 (2006 video card) working in dual-head mode with 1 portrait mode monitor in ubuntu 8.10, while i can in windows 2008 "workstation".

  4. Re:No surprise here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's why there's OpenBSD - nothing compares, really. I still use Linux for some things, but wireless, security, innovation, documentation, etc. Linux just doesn't come anywhere near as close to OpenBSD.

  5. netBSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Of course it runs NetBSD!

  6. Re:Just a dumb user . . . by batkiwi · · Score: 0, Troll

    So what do you do when you buy a new printer that Linux doesn't support yet? Update your ENTIRE KERNEL instead of just installing a simple driver? Repatch the changes by hand against your current kernel?