Slashdot Mirror


FCC Unanimously Approves White Space Wi-Fi

Smelly Jeffrey writes "With the release of this whitepaper, the FCC unanimously approved plans for a new technology with strong supporters and even stronger detractors. White Space Wi-Fi effectively allows manufacturers of wireless devices to incorporate transceivers that operate on unused DTV channels. Although the deregulation is new, the idea seems to have caught Google's interest recently as well. It seems that this has been rather rushed through the normally stagnant channels at the FCC. While some view it as interference in the already crowded spectrum, it seems the FCC Chairman really likes the idea of re-purposing dark parts of the newly allocated DTV bands once more." Update: 11/06 18:15 GMT by T : You may want to look at Tuesday's mention of the decision as well, but the additional links here are interesting.

4 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Good grief by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'll deregulate use of the spectrum, but if you say "blow job" on television, they'll fine you into oblivion. Sounds like they've got their priorities straight.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  2. Re:CmdrTaco, read before you post by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is rather offtopic, but I'd like to say it anyways...

    It used to be that the Slashdot frontpage was riddled with dupes. We complained every time that the editors were idiots, that they should have a system in place to recognize dupes. Many people even said that they emailed regarding the dupes while they were in the mysterious future, and yet the still hit the front page. Thus was born the Slashdot meme about every story being eventually duped.

    But, I have to say that over the last while, the number of dupes is way, way down. The firehose and tagging seem to have alot to do with it--dupes are flagged earlier in the process, giving the editors the feedback they need.

    Dupes are not entirely eliminated, but the frequency is down. So I'd like to say: thanks to the Slashdot staff for fixing the issue that we complained about. We are a whiny bunch, and it's too easy for us to complain but then forget to appreciate the things that are fixed (or have always been good). So, again, good work on the dupe reduction.

  3. Re:Yeah by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Odd how your position conflicts with your sig.

    I have young children, and I have a simple method for determining what they see. I hold the remote, and I change the channel if something fails to meet my approval. If a show or channel repeatedly crosses a line, we just don't watch it.

    This way, I can make sure my kids don't see really graphic violence, but are allowed to see healthy expressions of affection, within reason.

    I even have a name for this method: parenting. :)

    --

    You are not the customer.

  4. Re:Yeah by Golddess · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You do realize that there are other activities that one can partake of aside from watching TV, right?

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-