Slashdot Mirror


How Social Software Can Improve Democracy

Geek Satire writes "Politics breeds cynicism; politicians seem to pander to contradictory focus groups to get elected, then break their promises to everyone. Mass mailings and faxings overwhelm their staffs, and who knows if you can tell your representatives what you really think? Experienced techie and political consultant Silona Bonewald (creator of the Transparent Federal Budget) believes that simple software solutions can fix these problems and more. O'Reilly News recently discussed with her how social software can improve democracy and leadership."

4 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Anything which threatened the current system by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...would immediately be crushed by Congress in an act of self-preservation.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Re:Improve the Republic .. not the democracy by azgard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand your objection about direct democracy. If you don't think voters are rational or worse as leaders, why have democracy at all? I think people who don't want direct democracy actually don't want democracy at all, they just either don't say it in open or don't realize there is a logical inconsistency in their statements.

    By the way - I am from Europe and believe that the reason why USA was so much advanced is really the fact they had very advanced democracy (in some cases direct) on national and local level. If you had direct democracy on federal level, maybe you wouldn't have any problems you have now with war and debt.

    About your constitution - your founders may have been wrong. They were just people, anyway (they also didn't consider women and other races equal to white males). And at the time, there were no practical results with direct democracy. But they are now, and show very good results (increased happiness, better budget management, higher voter turnout, etc.).

  3. Re:I wish by azgard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, the practical experience with direct democracy (for example from Switzerland) says the exact opposite.

    People are _very_ conservative and don't like the change, even if it's for better.

    It's funny that you are talking about media influence, but at the same time parroting the power elite's propaganda about why the direct democracy cannot work.

  4. Re:Improve, not fix by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a direct democracy either every person needs to devote a lot of time to understanding every issue related to proposed laws, or a lot of uninformed people get to enforce their opinions. The entire point of representative democracy is that most people have better things to do with their time than study all of the issues behind every piece of legislation, so we pick people with a similar world-view to ourselves to do it for us. If you want an idea of how direct democracy would work, go for a ride in a taxi and listen to all of the uninformed opinions the driver has, then remember that his vote on every law would have the same weight as yours.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News