Slashdot Mirror
Good Freeware System Snapshot Tool For Windows?
Khyber writes "I'm doing a little personal research into a project that tracks what changes get made to your system every time you install a program. I know there are ways of checking through Windows Restore Points, but that's not what I'm trying to do. Instead, I'm going to start with an absolutely fresh Windows XP install, take a full snapshot of the entire installation on the hard drive, and burn that to a DVD (somewhat like a backup disc with an entire snapshot of my hard drive's current contents.) With every program I install, I'm going to take another snapshot, burn to DVD, and repeat the process until I have recreated every step taken to get to my current system state (all programs installed on a separate hard drive, all registry entries etc on the OS drive, with only snapshots of the OS drive being recorded.) The purpose for all of this I'm not legally allowed to talk about, due to confidentiality requirements. Does anybody know of such a program, preferably freeware, that will accomplish my objective, and are there tools that can be used to compare the difference in drive images?"
The best tool I have ever used is Prism Deploy.
It isn't free, but they do have a free trial. I've tried a number of programs to package executable programs and manage Windows images, but nothing has come close.
I'm really interested to see if there are any freeware programs that come close.
Sounds like a virtual environment is exactly what you need.
Personally, I use Ghost for imaging and if I want to find out what a program is doing, I run sysinternals File Monitor and Registry Monitor. They're real-time and don't record in a nice format but nothing really beats them on Windows. They've helped me diagnose hundreds of horrible modern and ancient installation programs used in an educational environment to allow network installation (why, exactly, do you need write access to C:\WINDOWS to run a Shockwave-based game for toddlers, etc.?).
Linux/Unix has this much easier because it allows you to monitor EVERYTHING without massive binary blobs having settings stored in them, having settings locked to particular machines, etc. or things generally getting in your way. Windows, it's a pain in the proverbial.
Even a lot of the professional MSI-Builders with their "discovery" modes are absolutely useless at working out what was actually a vital change and what was just the installer playing about, or the user changing their screensaver / explorer view preferences while they installed etc. I spend half my life cleaning MSI's of unnecessary cruft and inserting the entries that they miss. About 50% of automated install captures like this are useless for deployment to a different machine.
Basically, despite the "secrecy" around your particular purpose (why did you have to mention that at all... it makes no difference to what you want and adds nothing to our knowledge), it's probably not worth the hassle. Before and after snapshots, or package the programs and MSI's and you'll find out everything you need along the way, with an actual, practical result at the end. Trying to diff a filesystem/registry image in any way is madness and is only useful if you can get a *perfectly* clean machine, a VERY good automated program to do it brilliantly, where you'll end up with a lot of cruft that isn't related to the program installation at all (e.g. event log entries, temporary files, taskbar icons saving their settings etc.).
I would recommend regshot at sourceforge. GPL'd.
Norton Ghost is fairly cheap and Ghost Explorer will allow you to "browse" the images. I'm not entirely sure on the comparisons angle.
Trying to make an "alternative system rollback/savestate" program are we?
First, Ghost sucks. Not version 8, which was awesome, but the recent versions, which won't let you run ghost off the damn CD you paid for. No, you have to find an old copy and put that on a USB or other HD to run it from. B-tards.
This guy isn't trying to make his own ghost, he's trying to clone registry keys and serial numbers so he can push a software install. So he's tryign to clone Installshield, but in a way that magically provides great MSI compatibility to installers that don't already have MSI functionality.
AKA the windows tech pipe dream. And I say this after my last post was called an anti-apple troll because I suggested a $299 emachine laptop was "good enough" for most people vs a $1500 macbook :p
Oh and thanks to OP for the FOG link. Hadn't heard of it.
Captcha: atheism - the practice of not believing Steve jobs is God
Take that mods :)