Slashdot Mirror


OLPC's "Give 1 Get 1" Comes To Europe

Christoph Derndorfer writes "Last year OLPC's XO-laptop was among the hottest Christmas gadgets thanks to the organization's G1G1 program, where you could donate $399 to give one XO-laptop to a child in the developing world and receive one yourself in return. However in 2007 the program was only available for US and Canadian citizens. This year's program, which takes off November 17, is also available to citizens in the EU member states, Switzerland, Russia, and Turkey. This is certainly awesome news for all the OLPC / Linux / gadget enthusiasts here in Europe! P.S. Before anyone asks, these XOs will come equipped with the child-friendly Sugar platform, which is based on Fedora 9, and not Windows XP."

134 comments

  1. If and when I get a job... by feyhunde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If and when I get a Job after being laid off due to the bum economy I'll really think about this. It's a great program and I'd love to tinker with one.

    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    1. Re:If and when I get a job... by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Funny

      If and when I get a Job after being laid off due to the bum economy I'll really think about this. It's a great program and I'd love to tinker with one.

      Don't worry. The OLPC computer gives you the tools to overcome your low social class, enabling you to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps and find myriad possibilities in today's globalized, technological market.

    2. Re:If and when I get a job... by negRo_slim · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry. The OLPC computer gives you the tools to overcome your low social class, enabling you to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps and find myriad possibilities in today's globalized, technological market.

      Yes with the OLPC's help it will only be a matter of time before the wealth from the world's top 1% trickles down to you! Then with the crumbs that drop from their mouths you can feed your family!

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:If and when I get a job... by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you had one you could be browsing Monster or Dice for a new job right now!

      That's the catch-22 of OLPC.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:If and when I get a job... by horatiocain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry. The OLPC computer gives you the tools to overcome your low social class, enabling you to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps and find myriad possibilities in today's globalized, technological market.

      Yes with the OLPC's help it will only be a matter of time before the wealth from the world's top 1% trickles down to you! Then with the crumbs that drop from their mouths you can feed your family!

      Honestly? This is funny to you? Here we have a project operating in the wealthiest nation on Earth which attempts to balance out the logarithmic income discrepancy between the first and third worlds, and you're reframing its ideal outcome - competing in a global information economy - as 'feasting on crumbs'? What the fuck is funny about this?

      You're a sad person.

    5. Re:If and when I get a job... by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny story,

      I got laid off at the beginning of the year and took the time to come up with this, with my now-copious amounts of spare time:

      www.gentooxo.org

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    6. Re:If and when I get a job... by mewshi_nya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He was talking about the fact that this 'trickle-down' bullshit is completely bunk. And, frankly, we have bad enough income discrepancy in the first world. We need to fix our own problems - however, I have no problem with solving both concurrently.

    7. Re:If and when I get a job... by bXTr · · Score: 1

      Yes with the OLPC's help it will only be a matter of time before the wealth from the world's top 1% trickles down to you! Then with the crumbs that drop from their mouths you can feed your family!

      There maybe something dropping from somewhere, but it will not be, and it will not come from, what you think it will.

      --
      It's a very dark ride.
    8. Re:If and when I get a job... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're a sad person.

      Now this is funny to me - you entirely missed the point of the "joke". The very patheticity (yes, I invented that word just now, fuck off) of your response to the joke demonstrates how "sad" you are - which is hilarious.

      Perhaps you should pull that ivory tower off your ass, and come down here to the real world, where it is acceptable to make such statements about life and existence.

      You're an idiot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. How relevant is it now? by glop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi,

    I don't mean to troll.
    I am not sure how well the device has aged with all the new netbooks that are available.

    A few features that remain unmatched:
      - screen that works in sunlight
      - ebook mode (although I can read a PDF on my EEE and it looks great)
      - more rugged than other computers
      - battery life (?)
      - hand crank (did they provide it this time?)
      - wifi mesh

    Also, is there a guarantee that the OLPC you donate will not be running XP? I would not be too happy about sponsoring Microsoft...

    I am not shopping this year but I am afraid I would not choose the OLPC. Maybe I would get it for my kid though, I wonder.

    1. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Also, is there a guarantee that the OLPC you donate will not be running XP? I would not be too happy about sponsoring Microsoft...

      This needs to be said! There is obviously no such guarantee, as Colombia is getting Windows-XP based OLPCs... And soon others will follow...

      Boycott OLPC!

    2. Re:How relevant is it now? by calmofthestorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you're a kid, it may be a usable computer, but I'd advise against getting one for personal use. The sun screen is incredibly awesome and the hand crank is neat. If I could just pay $600 for an eee that could take variable power source and had the OLPC's sun viewable I'd totally do it (yes overpaying, but it would have incredible utility to me).

      Thing is, it's a cheap computer (for obvious reasons), big, heavy, and has terrible battery life*

      A steal at $200. Not so much at $400. This of course ignores the social impact. Getting one for a kid is not a terrible idea, my cousins seem to get sugar quite intuitively:-)

      * Tested last spring. Software improvements may have changed this. Also no suspend to RAM at that time.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    3. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not be too happy about sponsoring Microsoft...

      Luddite.

    4. Re:How relevant is it now? by LMacG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're buying via the G1G1 program primarily to get yourself a new notebook, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    5. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly will they deliver them? With the netbooks you can get one now, in stores or via mail order. The OLPC debacle last year with money taken and orders never delivered should put anyone off after a bit of research.

    6. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $400 a reasonable price to pay for one of these devices for your own personal use, so technically you're not giving anything: the company is the one giving away its own profits. So no, you won't be given any guarantees, since they're the ones doing this out of the goodness of their own hearts.

      If you want to give a gift, buy one, configure it the way you think it should be configured, and then give it to someone you think needs it.

    7. Re:How relevant is it now? by Threni · · Score: 1

      If they'd made these 1) any good, and 2) available at some point (in the UK) over the last 2 years they've been going on about, I'd have bought one and some profit could have been used to fund giving stuff away elsewhere. In the end I gave up and got an Acer netbook.

    8. Re:How relevant is it now? by blair1q · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No you aren't.

      The G1 still goes to someone who doesn't has, and you still has G1.

      That's exactly right, no matter why you wanted to G1.

    9. Re:How relevant is it now? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am not sure how well the device has aged with all the new netbooks that are available.

      The OLPC XO-1 is not and was never intended as a general-purpose netbook. Yes, it's possible to read Slashdot and play Doom and compile a Linux kernel on it, but that's only a side-effect. The hardware was specifically designed to be low-cost and geared towards primary-school-aged children.

      - hand crank (did they provide it this time?)

      In the developed world, a hand crank is even more a novelty than the XO-1 itself is.

      It will come with an AC adapter suitable to mains power in your country; if you really truly need dynamo power, you can salvage one from an emergency radio.

      - wifi mesh

      Really only useful for collaborating with other OLPC users in your immediate vicinity.

      I am not shopping this year but I am afraid I would not choose the OLPC. Maybe I would get it for my kid though, I wonder.

      Now you're beginning to see things the way OLPC wants you to.

    10. Re:How relevant is it now? by Sir_Kurt · · Score: 5, Informative

      I one (actualy two) for the personal use of me and my family in the original G1G1 program. They arrived on time, are very robust little computers. Great battery life, super screen and with the latest software load, suspend to ram and other goodies work just great. We use them as our travelling computers. I loaded mplayer, opera and midnight commander on the little beast, built a cord so we could run it off the power plug in the car, and we are good to go. I bought a 120 gig usb powered HD for the little beasty, and ripped and loaded our dvd collection on the hard drive. Many hours of driving entertainment for the kids. The wifi is fabulous, and it never met a hotel setup it couldn't connect to instantly. For those hotels with hardwired ethernet, a $10 usb ethernet port does it all.

      We are pleased.

      Kurt

    11. Re:How relevant is it now? by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're buying via the G1G1 program primarily to get yourself a new notebook, you're doing it wrong.

      If you're buying a laptop you don't like and won't use much only for the sake of making the donation, you're also doing it wrong. The environment doesn't need more junk, if you don't want it then buy one you do want and give some other way. I think most here on slashdot use their computers too much to have one they're not happy with, it would get replaced.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:How relevant is it now? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Insightful? No, you could not be further from the truth, my friend. There's nothing wrong with looking to be satisfied through ways which help others. Ever heard the verse, "Jesus, for the joy set before him, endured the cross"? I'm not sure who started it, but somewhere down the line we believed the lie that if we in some way get satisfaction out of helping others (volunteering at the homeless shelter or something) that this, in some way or manner, decreases the value of the kind act we did. Not true.

    13. Re:How relevant is it now? by schwaang · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few features that remain unmatched:
          - screen that works in sunlight
          - ebook mode (although I can read a PDF on my EEE and it looks great)
          - more rugged than other computers
          - battery life (?)
          - hand crank (did they provide it this time?)
          - wifi mesh

      Among those features, some are still not fully realized on the XO, due mostly to software. Sunlight-readable, check. Ruggedness, check.

      But the ebook mode is not nearly as usable as it could be IMO. For one thing, when you rotate the display orientation using the rotate button, the scroll buttons don't rotate to match. Also, it's surprising how little UI activity you can accomplish from the ebook mode. (The XO's ebook mode is when you fold the display to cover the keyboard. You have access to a four-way arrow pad, a rotate-screen button, on/off button, and the four-button game pad which is used to give you page up, page down.) In particular, you can't access any menus, or use arrows to move the mouse, or anything like that.

      On battery life, the vaunted powersaving potential of the XO's micro-sleep ability is only just beginning to be implemented in the latest software. It is considered experimental. After x seconds of inactivity, the display dims and presumably the CPU naps until a key is pressed. This came out in the latest supported release. When the original G1G1 came out, you couldn't even do the normal Linux suspend/resume, which was a bit of a shock. Things have come a long way, and my guess is this will continue to be polished.

      The hand crank concept was replaced with a pull-cord. It isn't provided to G1G1 users, who live amongst reliable electrical infrastructure.

      The wifi mesh isn't useful for G1G1 users, unless maybe you GnGn for n > 1. The mesh is one way that application collaboration is enabled. From my reading, it seems to be problematic in the field, at least for fair sized meshes (> something like 12 users, could be > 30, I forget where this stands now).

      Collaboration is one of the coolest features of the XO in its target environment, but typical G1G1 folks won't get to play much with it.

      Going back to ebook mode, I also found it difficult to adapt to the Sugar journal when it comes to storing my PDF books for later review. Kids not habituated to typical file hierarchies may not have that problem. And of course you can put some variant of a standard Linux distro on it, there are lots of ongoing efforts at making that easier and better.

      In summary - this year's G1G1 donors will be in *way* better shape than last year's, because OLPC is teaming with better order-fulfillment partners and because the OLPC/sugar software has begun to realize more of the XO's potential. But frankly, the software still has a ways to go, and suffers from the herculean strain of making modern software work on very limited computing resources with a development staff that is smart, dedicated, and amazing -- but not very large for the size of the task.

    14. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a eee and give a OLPC!

    15. Re:How relevant is it now? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      while I fully believe that altruism is simply a form of selfishness, this is right; just because you do it for your own happiness doesn't mean you devalue the act. It's still the same act.

    16. Re:How relevant is it now? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      considering how badly put together modern portable dvd players are (unless you buy the ones with out hinges) if the olpc laptop could play dvds (it can't that i'm aware of) it would be worth the money.

      but it can't so since i lack any children. there is no reason for me to buy a 'learning tool' i know i'm not the only slashdotter without a family. i just don't see the g1g1 working for people without kids.

      portable web browser? today's phones do that, and with better coverage.

    17. Re:How relevant is it now? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Selfishness, by definition, is pursuing your own happiness to ends which are a detriment of others. There is nothing wrong with altruistic acts to make yourself happy.

    18. Re:How relevant is it now? by popo · · Score: 1

      The problem is though, that XP would be much, much more useful to teach young kids than the absolute horror story which was the OLPC flavor of Linux.

      Not only was the OLPC OS an atrocity, but frankly -- if you were a poor kid in some Rio favela -- what would you rather know: Some obscure flavor of Linux which looks something like Microsoft BOB, or a global standard?

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    19. Re:How relevant is it now? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      But the global standard is like microsoft bob...

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    20. Re:How relevant is it now? by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Selfishness, by definition, is pursuing your own happiness to ends which are a detriment of others.

      Bullshit. That's honestly the stupidest fucking thing I've heard in months. Show me the definition of "selfish" that requires you to do harm to other people.

      It's not in the definition Merriam Webster uses. And it's not in Wiktionary's definition. And it's not in the definition at reference.com.

      Seriously, how do you people come up with this bullshit? Fucking idiots.

      If you're doing something to make yourself happy, you're being selfish. Whether it's altruistic or not.

    21. Re:How relevant is it now? by conlaw · · Score: 1

      since i lack any children. there is no reason for me to buy a 'learning tool'

      You could buy two and give the second one to a disadvantaged child in this country.

    22. Re:How relevant is it now? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      2/10

    23. Re:How relevant is it now? by uassholes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bullshit.

    24. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're buying via the G1G1 program primarily to get yourself a new notebook, you're doing it wrong.

      If you're buying a laptop you don't like and won't use much only for the sake of making the donation, you're also doing it wrong. The environment doesn't need more junk, if you don't want it then buy one you do want and give some other way. I think most here on slashdot use their computers too much to have one they're not happy with, it would get replaced.

      Yep I replaced using a Windows system for an OLPC XO. Sugar is simpler and easier to use and the underlying Fedora 9 is very useful. I also have Ubuntu running off an SD card and the Open FirmWare makes it simple to multiboot.

    25. Re:How relevant is it now? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The wifi mesh isn't useful for G1G1 users, unless maybe you GnGn for n > 1. The mesh is one way that application collaboration is enabled. From my reading, it seems to be problematic in the field, at least for fair sized meshes ...

      My wife and I got a couple, plus one for a grandkid, and we did a bunch of experimenting. We were never able to find anything that we could call a successful collaboration. We don't consider seeing each others' icons on the screen and "friending" each other to be collaboration, since it doesn't actually accomplish anything. I spent some time poking around in laptops.org to get more info, but that didn't lead to any collaboration. Anyone know where it might be documented?

      The grandkid did find a few games that he liked, but we didn't find any way that the games could be played in a collaborative fashion. We keep thinking that we missed something important.

      OTOH, we were impressed by how much better the OLPCs used any nearby wifi access points than any of our "grownups'" computers. It can see and use our (and our neighbors') Apple airports at 2 or 3 times the distance that a Mac laptop can, for instance, and it can use wifi APs that various Windows and linux laptops can't successfully use at all. I wonder if we could get the OLPC's wifi software and port it to RedHat and Ubuntu (and XP and Vista ;-).

      And on the third hand, I wish we could figure out how to use the OLPC's browser's bookmarks and history. It seems to have those features, but we've been defeated at every attempt. WTF is going on with those things? Are they documented somewhere that we can't find (in a way that makes sense to adults with computer experience)?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    26. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely off mark. The large majority of people here were probably interested in the OLPC for one thing only, a cheap, Linux compatible notebook that would let them scratch their geek itch.

      If the only way to obtain one was the G1G1 program, then fine, many were willing to do that. At $400, it still came out cheaper than other notebooks at the time, and they get the warm-fuzzy feeling they were helping out an anonymous child out there.

      But since the original announcement, Eee happened. A cheap, Linux compatible, notebook that'll let them scratch their geek itch.

      Of all those people who gave up on the OLPC and bought a netbook in the meantime, have any considered donating the difference (if any) from $400 towards some charitable cause?

    27. Re:How relevant is it now? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The problem is this: if you look at the specs of the OLPC,it would run WIN98 okay. WinXP? Not so much. Not to mention the elephant in the room that nobody seems to mention. SWAP

      Working freelance jobs and with SMBs I've had the chance to work with XP Embedded, WinFLP, vanilla XP,and even rolled a few of my own with NLite. And you know what? They ALL pound the swap like it is going out of style! I don't think I've ever seen a Windows that DIDN'T like to pound the swap like a red headed stepchild. This would not be a problem if OLPC had a HDD,but it don't,it has a SSD. Which means WinXP is going to kill that thing a whole lot faster than any Linux will,because Linux doesn't by default beat the swap to death,and with a little tweaking can be downright miserly when it comes to swap.

      Not to mention the fact that this laptop was SUPPOSED to be for teaching education to third world kids,not for third world office equipment,which I have a feeling is EXACTLY what these things are going to end up. Is there really a pressing need to teach a third grader how to edit a word doc or make a powerpoint? Because with the little amount of space on these things that'll pretty much be all you can teach them. And finally they can never actually allow them net access,because the tiny amount of CPU and SSD space means no AV or updates,which we all know with XP means instant pwned.

      The simple fact is IMHO Negroponte took what could have been a truly wonderful idea,which was a dirt cheap laptop for ALL the world's children,and has consistently fucked it up. If he would have sold them to the first world,and no "buy two get one" is NOT selling to the first world,that is forced charity,he could have gotten the economies of scale on his side and it would truly be a $100 laptop. He could have taken the profits and used it to give away a lot of laptops or to lower the prices even further to third world countries,but instead he pissed away his chance and gave up the market that ASUS and Acer now rule with the Netbook. And by trying to jam XP,which was never made for SSD and certainly wasn't made for something as underpowered as the OLPC,he ran off most of the FLOSS guys that were trying to make the OLPC a real teaching tool for kids. Instead what he has is a really shitty underpowered Windows laptop that'll let you edit Word docs in the sun. Big Whoop. And with the economy in the shitter and folks about to lose their jobs I doubt he'll be seeing many takers for his "buy two get one" style of charity. My only hope is that when he fails and runs the OLPC into the ground some company will buy the design and use the economies of scale to make the OLPC truly a laptop for ALL the world's kids,first and third world alike.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    28. Re:How relevant is it now? by inasity_rules · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're a kid, it may be a usable computer, but I'd advise against getting one for personal use. The sun screen is incredibly awesome and the hand crank is neat. If I could just pay $600 for an eee that could take variable power source and had the OLPC's sun viewable I'd totally do it (

      Its called a DC-DC converter. Its fairly simple and cheap to build(1 IC, an inductor and a FET are the major components), and if you put a step-down after a step-up you can build a high current system that will take anything between 6V and 28V and provide the correct output for any laptop. I run my laptop off such a system without problems. Efficiency is above 80%. Just make sure the supply can provide sufficient current. Sealed Pb-Acid batteries work well.

      The sunlight readable screen is just a bit harder though..I had an idea about replacing the white paper behind the TFT matrix with a mirror, but I think it would distort the colours.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    29. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just as relevant as any Micro$oft product. It's full of evil.

      Don't buy one.

    30. Re:How relevant is it now? by schwaang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I spent some time poking around in laptops.org to get more info, but that didn't lead to any collaboration. Anyone know where it might be documented?

      I haven't tested collaboration myself, but here's what looks like documentation. And here's a link that describes how a Jabber server is used to enable collaboration without using the mesh. I believe that by pointing to a particular server anywhere on the net, you can collaborate with anyone else on that server. Here's a blog post showing how to point sugar at a jabber server. I think you can also configure a server within the recent sugar control panel versions.

      OTOH, we were impressed by how much better the OLPCs used any nearby wifi access points than any of our "grownups'" computers.

      Same here. My XO always sees more APs than my standard notebook, I think it's those cute "ears" which are the antennae. I don't think it's the firmware/software.

      And on the third hand, I wish we could figure out how to use the OLPC's browser's bookmarks and history.

      Among the improvements since the first G1G1, OLPC now includes Firefox 3 in the G1G1 activity set for Release 8.2, and it works pretty well. I don't use the non-FF browser anymore myself for the reasons you mention.

    31. Re:How relevant is it now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it not also selfish if some little bastard expects me to give it one of MY laptops.

      Regards,
      The Bastard Troll

    32. Re:How relevant is it now? by sproot · · Score: 1

      Typical, no mods points when I need them: +1 Harsh Reality

    33. Re:How relevant is it now? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The G1 still goes to someone

      Citation required.

      As far as I can see, OLPC makes no guarantee at all that they will "give one" for every one that's bought. Rather, they sell you a "$100" toy for $400, and plough the profit back into their business. Given the colossal serial fuckup they seem to be making of that, I doubt that a free device will ever pop out the other end due to your generous "donation".

      Maybe that's good enough for you, but if I'm going to pay $400 for an obsolescent widget with no support, I'll damn well expect at least some cybering with the hot South American teenager that's "got" the companion device.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    34. Re:How relevant is it now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I want the XO to use for reading email, chatting, and reading ebooks. But I'm not going to G1G1 at $400 when I can pick up a used XO on ebay for $300...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:How relevant is it now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In the developed world, a hand crank is even more a novelty than the XO-1 itself is.

      I want the XO for two reasons; for everyday use, and for post-collapse use. A pair of XOs, hand-crank or yo-yo chargers, and a useful reference library on flash memory storage can be carried by two people in their packs, unlike a big shelf full of reference books. Even if you just want to use it while you're out in the wilderness, backpacking, et cetera, a hand-operated mobile power solution is mandatory.

      The charger was billed as a major feature of the XO, and the fact that it was dropped from the US program was the very reason I did not participate when it was running, and I had the money.

      - wifi mesh

      Really only useful for collaborating with other OLPC users in your immediate vicinity.

      It's also useful for tying two OLPCs that you own together.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:How relevant is it now? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      In the developed world, a hand crank is even more a novelty than the XO-1 itself is.

      You must have a very boring life if you've never been without AC power for more than 3 hours.

    37. Re:How relevant is it now? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "citation required" would put the onus on you to prove OLPC is committing a crime such as that.

      I encourage you to do so, but I would bet against your being correct.

    38. Re:How relevant is it now? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      touche.

      i was going to write more, but it was more important that i typed it out, rather than post it.

    39. Re:How relevant is it now? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      You must have a very boring life if you've never been without AC power for more than 3 hours.

      You must have a very boring life if you can't go more than three hours without a computer.

  3. Child friendly by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    Before anyone asks, these XOs will come equipped with the child-friendly Sugar platform

    If Sugar is child friendly, to whom is Windows friendly towards?

    1. Re:Child friendly by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Funny

      If Sugar is child friendly, to whom is Windows friendly towards?

      Pedobear?

    2. Re:Child friendly by Diss+Champ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft

    3. Re:Child friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The greater majority of teens and adults.

    4. Re:Child friendly by torry_loon · · Score: 1

      If Sugar is child friendly, to whom is Windows friendly towards?

      Anyone with enough money to satisfy the greed of Microsoft's board members.

    5. Re:Child friendly by westlake · · Score: 1
      If Sugar is child friendly, to whom is Windows friendly towards?

      Is this a trick question?

      The answer, of course, is "anyone using a computer outside a grade school classroom."

      The UI will be familiar and the core apps much the same in any working environment.

      That is what makes Windows on the XO so compelling to the third world education minister - who wants to get as many of his kids as possible on track for the higher grades, college, trade and business school.

  4. Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on my promised 100$ laptop. OLPC and Asus didn't deliver.

  5. 100 $ laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Costs were supposed to come down but it hasn't happened. The idea was great but project's failure has been its relatively small scale, partially because the market is artificially limited by the project itself.
    It's ironic that for-profit company Asus has started a revolution with its commercial line of netbooks. Huge volumes and low cost in these commercial products can eventually deliver one laptop per child -project's goals by making computers cheap enough for the third world.

    1. Re:100 $ laptop by rhyder128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've never understood the coy attitude of the OLPC. Why do they go to such lengths to make it difficult for the average Joe to buy one of these things? A couple of years ago this would have been the ideal stocking filler for kid with nerd parents. Actually getting these devices into the hands of the geeks who were clamouring for one would have benefited the project in so many ways. For one thing, by allowing such a group to buy the things, they could have begun to cultivate a hobbyist development scene for the platform.

      What possible harm could it have done to make it available to anyone who wanted one?

      It's probably too late for the project now anyway. It's lasting legacy might be some awareness of the importance of IT to developing nations in addition to helping kickstart consumer interest in netbooks.

      From now on this should be referred to as "pulling an Amiga". I.e. killing off a good idea by restricting access.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:100 $ laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To make the OLPC laptop possible, they had to get help from big manufacturers. These manufacturers probably made it a condition that the market in high income countries won't be ruined by extremely cheap laptops. So you can get one of these laptops, but only if you pay a first world price for it. It doesn't matter that they have to build two for that price, as long as you pay the higher price and only get one.

    3. Re:100 $ laptop by tylerni7 · · Score: 1

      They had some problems shipping laptops to everyone that ordered one, with a whole lot of people complaining about not getting their shipment. It wouldn't surprise me if they stopped shipment because they couldn't keep up with the demand.

    4. Re:100 $ laptop by Brain_Recall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the big concerns is the inability to provide large-scale support (hardware warranty, returns, software mishaps). The average-Joe would expect this, as a lot of them did even with the G1G1 program. Support for new schools usually came from people who were trained by the OLPC staff, and who continued support after the staff had left. It would be a logistical nightmare to try to provide support to thousands of people all over the country, something this non-profit didn't want to get involved with.

    5. Re:100 $ laptop by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      They also complain that they haven't been able to drive prices down because they haven't been able to achieve sufficient volume.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    6. Re:100 $ laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a rather silly theory. The market in high-income countries *is* being ruined by much better cheap laptops, like netbooks. Personal computers are a commodity and manufacturers don't make huge margins on them, so nobody is in a monopoly situation where they have a market to defend. And OLPCs don't compete with laptops directly anyway because they're so slow and limited in features - they would probably fit the same niche as today's netbooks, a lighter computer for those on the go.

    7. Re:100 $ laptop by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      Even if the project itself hasn't achieved certain goals yet, it has definitely pushed the boundaries and created a whole new format for notebooks. We will get to the $100 laptop one day, and we are alot closer to it today than where a few years back.

      Anyway would we have the EEE-PC if it was not for the OLPC???

  6. Hope they get the logistics right this time by GBC · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am based in the UK but ordered an XO in the initial G1G1 programme and had it delivered to a friend in the US who then sent it on to me here in London. All I can say is that the experience was an absolute debacle. If you check the forums of OLPC News you can see just how bad it was - repeated broken promises as to delivery dates, support staff who couldn't provide any answers and an end product less than what was initially promised (e.g. no separate power generating devices).

    I was and still am a supporter of the OLPC; whilst the product itself is not aimed at me, even still I think it is a great computer and a lot of fun to use. I give them full credit as well for creating the "netbook" market from nothing. However, the G1G1 experience turned a lot of people off the OLPC organisation. It is hard to have confidence that they can execute their mission when they couldn't even get the logistics right for a first world country. I just hope we don't have a repeat of that this time around.

    1. Re:Hope they get the logistics right this time by teazen · · Score: 1

      That's why they're handing the logistics over to Amazon this time around.

      And yes, also for me it was a disaster. XO order was months behind schedule, contact information was wrong, they double billed me. They should have outsourced this the first time, but since they didn't have any experience in this department, they didn't know what they were getting themselves into.

      You have to take the good with the bad I guess, when you deal with a non-corporate startup that wants to do stuff differently.

  7. Pandora is better by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Few years ago the OLPC was my wet dream, but it took soo long for it, to be available for buy, that it's plain crazy. The Eee and ASUS stuff appeared. But they are all plain junk - very heavy, and very short battery life. OLPC at least is rechargeable...

    But, oh well, fortunately now there is Pandora, I have ordered one and got to wait until december to receive it. I think that Pandora is revolutionary to Portable / Personal Micro Computers as Sinclair ZX Spectrum was at its own time. I may be wrong, but there's something in it. So it might be true. Time will tell.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:Pandora is better by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 5, Informative

      ah, for those who don't know what I'm talking about, here's the website http://openpandora.org/

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    2. Re:Pandora is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I saw this, I thought: why did this spam get modded up?

      Then I saw the device, and thought: wow, that's small, but I probably won't buy one because that woman is wearing a top I can't see down.

      Then I saw that it's a British company (?!!!!) that's making something useful, and it runs on an ARM processor with reasonable specs ...

      Then this happened, now I just have to persuade the wife -- after changing my pants -- that she should buy me one for Christmas.

    3. Re:Pandora is better by spinkham · · Score: 1

      That looks like a nice homebrew gaming machine, but a really crappy laptop. That is NOT a usable keyboard.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    4. Re:Pandora is better by Zerth · · Score: 1

      It'll have to be a late Xmas present, they sold out and aren't getting in more until january.

  8. Dell Mini 9 on it's way... by hm2k · · Score: 1

    Shame, I already ordered a Dell Mini 9.

  9. I'm still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm still waiting for the Buy One, Taunt One program. Where you buy a laptop loaded with Linux, and another is sent to a Microsoft employee. Complete with the Firefox home page set to the last Slashdot story bashing Microsoft.

    Naturally the packages will be addressed to:
    Micro$oft,
    One Micro$oft Way,
    Redmond, WA 98052-6399 U.$

  10. Ah by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so when they want our money, then it is Linux configured. Otherwise, they take MS. Hmmmm. Thanx, but no thanx. Besides, it is the west that is hurting bad.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Ah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah shut the fuck up fatty

    2. Re:Ah by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Besides, it is the west that is hurting bad.

      It's only hurting relative to a couple of years ago, we're not starving, and we're still able to send our kids to school.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Ah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. An intelligent response by who? Just another idiot.

  11. Thinking about buying one by The_DoubleU · · Score: 1

    I think the idea is great and thinking about buying one as a xmas present for a 5 year old kid. Is this something for a child that age?
    What about pricing? $399 or â 312. I thought it would be a $100 dollar laptop, so I'm buying 4 (1 for me, 3 for OLPC)?
    Did they beef up the spec or is this the same version with just a new OS?

    --
    What power has law where only money rules.
    1. Re:Thinking about buying one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      GFE.

      But on a serious note - It's been said for a long time that the price point of $100 was an eventual goal, and that manufacturing scale did not allow it to meet that goal (yet). As such, the laptops cost roughly $200 ($188 to quote OLPC's information precisely) - hence the "Give 1, Get 1" program name.

      As for the spec, this is the same thing with a new OS. That being said, the OS improvements are supposedly vast in the performance department.

      Lastly, on the topic of giving it to a 5 year old - well, that really depends on the child. On the one hand, they may become bored with the somewhat slow processor. On the other, they may not have the experience to know that you can do most of the things it can do much quicker. Having purchased one during the previous G1G1 initiative (and having experienced NONE of the problems that plagued it, though it was sadly stolen), I would say that it would be a good bet.

  12. Anybody still care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    G1G1 was great when people thought they were helping a non-profit promote free software and open hardware throughout the world. Now that that dream is over and OLPC is primarily promoting MS, who cares about OLPC?

    1. Re:Anybody still care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd RTFA, you would see that over 99% of all shipped XOs run Fedora.

    2. Re:Anybody still care? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      If you were doing OLPC because you're a zealot looking to promote your ideology, not to help out poor people, you were doing it so wrong it's not even funny.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  13. OLPC FOr Sale on Amazon.com on Nov 17 by bangzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Starting November 17 Amazon.com will off the OLPC http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?ie=UTF8&marketplaceID=ATVPDKIKX0DER&me=A34NLXJLC88VVS. Quite appropriate since it was Jeff Bezos that came up with the buy-two-get-one program.

    --
    Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
  14. Switzerland!=EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, it's not that hard....

    1. Re:Switzerland!=EU by Markspark · · Score: 1

      and neither is Russia! but alas, i am not surprised.

      --
      i find your lack of faith in science disturbing!
    2. Re:Switzerland!=EU by Markspark · · Score: 1

      hehe, and after reading the summary, i realized, neither is Turkey.

      --
      i find your lack of faith in science disturbing!
    3. Re:Switzerland!=EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, duh, Einstein.

      That's why they wrote EU member states and Switzerland.

      I don't know what is sadder: that you didn't realize "W, X, Y and Z" can mean "W and X and Y and Z" or that you seem to think Russia and Turkey are members of the European Union...

  15. Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great. One year after the US and Canada, we in Europe should be pleased to be elegible for a program that was a flop in the US, at a moment when the hardware was up to date.
    Now OLPC wants us to get hyped for a piece of hardware that has become old and irrelevant, just because they couldn't include us at the moment when the offer would have been interesting because it consisted of some relevant hardware?

    Sorry, for me it's again 'too little, too late'. If the OLPC would have included us last year, I would have gladly donated, but I'm sick of being percieved as a second-class citizen that only matters when there are problems to be solved.

  16. Yes, it was a cluster fuck. by VValdo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As one who participated in the first G1G1 I can attest that they were totally unprepared to handle the orders. It was a huge mess. That said, it was eventually made right, the little green guy showed up, and although the initial software kind of sucked, the new build is a lot, LOT better.

    And as a bonus it came with a year of T-Mobile Hotspot access free, which is nice.

    I presume the new OLPC this year will not look like the 2.0 "all touch" dual-screen design previewed in May?

    Actually somre more info re: the new G1G1 is here. From TFA, looks like Amazon will be handling the orders this time, which should be a major improvement. Is T-Mobile going to throw in like last time?

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  17. Any way to hack it to get SVGA out? by EWAdams · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd love to ditch my laptop and replace it with an XO just for the cool-value at conferences, but I need to give presentations. Any way to get SVGA out of it?

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:Any way to hack it to get SVGA out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This (google cache - the OLPC wiki seems to be down) should help you (it's a bit clunky, but it works fine)

    2. Re:Any way to hack it to get SVGA out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB adapter. At least i think so. There is an article about that on their wiki (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Adding_USB_SVGA), but it's slashdotted.

    3. Re:Any way to hack it to get SVGA out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to ditch my laptop and replace it with an XO just for the cool-value at conferences, but I need to give presentations. Any way to get SVGA out of it?

      Use VNC or similar

  18. Google is your friend! by carvalhao · · Score: 1

    Fact check: Turkey is NOT an EU member.

    1. Re:Google is your friend! by esampson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither are Russia or Switzerland. That's why the list says 'EU members states, Switzerland, Russia, and Turkey' instead of 'EU member states; Switzerland, Russia, and Turkey'. :)

    2. Re:Google is your friend! by sanso999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That may be so, but they all take part in EuroVISION, so they have a foot in the door....

  19. Disillusion by XB-70 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I bought into the dream last December. Sent in my money and got a unit in Jan/Feb (I forget). I played with the unit like crazy - learning all its idiosyncrasies. Then the whole OLPC program started to unravel. Key people dropped out. The O/S and Sugar had not evolved much as of June '08. OLPC sent ONE (1) person to Peru for a roll-out of thousands of machines - many of which had problems or needed upgrades. Intel got involved - and dropped out... and now Microsoft...

    -I have managed to upgrade the software exactly twice - a complex, virtual dance of death if the upgrade doesn't take.

    -The machine is DOG slow.

    - The keyboard is useless for high school kids.

    - There is not enough memory for much A/V.

    - Connecting to WiFi is counter-intuitive if security is involved.

    - There is no native printer support.

    Quite frankly, I'm sceptical that this thing can fly long-term because other, full-fledged products are catching up (ASUS) to the OLPC price-point will fully loaded Linux on a better machine.

    Now, the positives - battery life has been amazing. The screen is truly a wonder and great as a reader flipped over and turned sideways.

    One issue troubles me: In this and other projects, no-one has solved the problem of supplying internet connectivity in remote areas. I know that Google is launching a constellation of Ka band satellites - but they will be commercial. One idea that I saw was to use a WiFi server on either buses or motorcycles. Local servers pump email etc. to the mobile servers which then dump the data when they get to a hot-spot - and visa-versa. Sort of a sneakernet for the back woods.

    I'm concerned about the entire support infrastructure. Further to that, why don't these things come pre-loaded with regional Wikis and the full slate of curriculae as set out by the country involved?

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
    1. Re:Disillusion by Brain_Recall · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't defend everything, so I'll just post some info. Full-scale OS updates aren't intended for its intended audience. I've had bad upgrades, but only when playing with the development branch (joyride). Activities can be updated easily with a new Sugar build. Sugar was just updated very recently. I would post a link, but the wiki is down at the moment. It has some changes, modified layout, better power management, and a control panel with a software updater. Wifi with security is a LOT better than it was. Mine syncs right up with WPA for me without any trouble. There are localized Wiki activities now available. And, these do often come specialized for the country they are being delivered to, including electronic books that they use. These are often special builds not available to the public, so you wouldn't see much of them.

    2. Re:Disillusion by grcumb · · Score: 1

      One issue troubles me: In this and other projects, no-one has solved the problem of supplying internet connectivity in remote areas. I know that Google is launching a constellation of Ka band satellites - but they will be commercial. One idea that I saw was to use a WiFi server on either buses or motorcycles. Local servers pump email etc. to the mobile servers which then dump the data when they get to a hot-spot - and visa-versa. Sort of a sneakernet for the back woods.

      You've effectively answered your own question. Yes, it's early days yet where rural Internet access in concerned, and as you imply, there is no silver bullet. Just as it was in the early days of Internet in the developed world, it's a matter of choosing what's technologically appropriate for each particular case.

      In my neck of the woods (South Pacific) we're taking advantage of a happy accident to get very low-cost VSAT access throughout the region. In other countries that I've spoken and/or worked with, the plan is generally to start with VSAT, then attack the necessary policy issues that need to be addressed in order to create a national ICT policy.

      It's slow going, but the work seems to be paying off. Here in Vanuatu, we're already piloting the XO with a local NGO, and the Ministry of Education has indicated their intent to run a pilot of their own. We're explicitly linking the provision of Internet to the XO roll-out for obvious reasons.

      In all, the process of liberalising the local telecoms market has taken about a decade, and we're not done yet. It's unfortunate for us geeks who always want tomorrow's toys today, but slow and steady really is the only way to go if you want things to be sustainable.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:Disillusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - there are much better products at $400 now. If they'd just sell the things to make a profit, say, at $300 it'd be a viable competitor.

      Selling at a premium price point only works when the hardware is something special. If they put the things in Wal-Mart at $279, sales would skyrocket - and thus they would have piles of cash to give them away wherever they like.

      That's what they do now anyway - you don't actually purchase two computers, but one of them is shipped somewhere else - you buy one computer, with $200 profit attached, which is put into a pile of money to build more to send off to wherever. $400 is just too aggressive for what it is.

      Think about it - if you go to Goodwill, you don't buy a coat so that an identical coat can be given away to someone who needs it. You go in and spend, say, $20 on some old records, a book, and a sweater, the profit from that goes into Goodwill's general fund, which then buys whatever is needed at the time - which is then given out. G1G1 is gimmicky nonsense that limits the charitable impact of the whole program.

  20. Too late, I might have bitten last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But now I have an EeePC.

    Says it all, really.

  21. client of mine never got his, had to do chargeback by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    repeated broken promises as to delivery dates, support staff who couldn't provide any answers and an end product less than what was initially promised (e.g. no separate power generating devices).

    No shit. A client of mine ordered *TWO* G1G1 packages, and they never showed up. Repeated calls to the company resulted in: "we lost your order", but they couldn't even figure out how to refund his money. He ended up having to do a chargeback.

    Given that loads of people never got theirs, what do you think the chances are that the *other* party in the whole "G1G1" scam*cough*, I mean, "program", got theirs?

  22. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year I couldn't order one. Now I don't want to.

  23. What is the different by kentsin · · Score: 1

    Why no info were disclose? Are there any different?

    Last years's G1G1 does not count an success by some means.

    Check out the price on ebay.

  24. A Positive Story by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    With all the bad experiences related, I thought I'd add my good experiences. Ours came a week before Christmas. It worked great. It is as fast and has as much memory as the email/imap/vpn/squid server used by one of my clients remote offices. The only thing that is too slow is the Flash plugin that runs Webkins - but I don't really want my daughter playing Webkins all the time anyway. With current releases, I get 5 hour battery life - better than any full size laptop at our house. The 10" screen is razor sharp and the sun mode and ebook mode are great. It is a big hit with the kids in the neighborhood. I use it myself a lot because I can curl up with it in an easy chair.

    The bad news: It took some updating and playing to get to the above. The keyboard is too small for an adult, but USB keyboards work fine. Here are the things that made it slow as delivered:

    1) The FFS2 filesystem is slow and eats a lot of memory. Running from a USB drive - even a fast 8GB flash drive - is much faster. Doing so is poorly supported as of yet - although there is a test project for a SDHC card OLPC distro based on Fedora 9. There are also Ubuntu ports to run from USB or SDHC card.

    2) Adding swap space (via USB or SDHC card) is a big improvement.

    3) The Sugar software is vastly improved in speed between the version delivered in last years G1G1 and the current 767. Each update brought speed improvements in Sugar. The applications were always reasonably fast (except flash plugin for browser and memorize).

    4) The first update to support suspend to ram also removed power from the SDHC card without the proper hardware protocol, and then wrote over the partition table on wakeup. NOT cool. (Apparently fixed now. Moral - remove SDHC before testing base OLPC updates.)

    Note that G1G1 will be distributed by Amazon this year. They should do a better job than the volunteers did in last years.

    1. Re:A Positive Story by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

      I meant to say "overtaxed volunteers". It was simply a matter of biting off too much.

  25. Yesterday's project, surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Slashdot: News for nerds, stuff that mattered two years ago."

    Sugar's a horrible, horrible UI. It's Linux's Microsoft BOB. The OLPC hardware's largely been supplanted by eeePC-class laptops that deliver more bang for fairly equivalent buck.

    Thanks OLPC for kick-starting a market segment, but, your day is done.

  26. $400 was almost reasonable last year by r00t · · Score: 1

    Normally, products drop in price as competitors
    show up. They are also now XP-tainted (even if not
    shipping it in G1G1) and not the "new thing".
    OLPC is going to be sorely disappointed this year.

    They've never been the type to accept reality.

    1. Re:$400 was almost reasonable last year by mspohr · · Score: 1

      They are $200 each. I have yet to see any of the new crop of netbooks reach this low price. The original Asus was hyped to have that low price but was introduced at twice the price.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  27. you're a zealot too by r00t · · Score: 1

    You sound like a zealot looking to promote
    your ideology, not to promote software freedom.

    (your ideology being that poor people should be
    helped, and that this should be done by providing
    them with free-as-in-beer electronic junk)

    Making poor people depend on a for-profit
    software vendor is an "interesting" ideology.

    1. Re:you're a zealot too by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      (your ideology being that poor people should be helped, and that this should be done by providing them with free-as-in-beer electronic junk)

      Terrible assumption you've made. I think we should help poor people by whatever means possible (ethics permitting, of course... no killing people to help the poor or some crazy scenario like that, and no, it is not unethical to give them proprietary software). Free software, proprietary software... it's the same in my book. Use whichever helps your goals more.

      So if you want to call helping the less fortunate an "ideology", then I guess I'm a zealot for that ideology. But I don't think that's a reasonable categorization by a long shot.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  28. "DOG slow" by r00t · · Score: 1

    The hardware is nothing nice by 2008 standards,
    but it isn't hopeless. It's like 1996 to 2000.

    The problem is that a bunch of dumb-ass morons
    decided to write the entire GUI in Python. WTF?
    Then, since that wasn't stupid enough, they used
    lots of message passing and SVG graphics.

    I've never seen a good explanation or excuse for
    this, or even an admission of the mistake. Sugar
    developers do all sorts of nasty performance hacks
    yet are unable to confront the real problems.

  29. I also bought in the US and shipped to the UK by Shag · · Score: 1

    My daughter's at school in the UK, so I bought one, sat through the delays and more delays (told her that there was a "late Christmas present" coming, but I wasn't quite sure when) then FedEx'ed it over to her. FedEx alone cost close to half the "value" of the thing - and then the UK bastards wanted her to pay customs duty too. Teach me to ship it in the original box, I guess...

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  30. Re:OLPC is primarily promoting MS by naz404 · · Score: 1

    OLPC is *NOT* primarily promoting MS.

    In fact, I don't think anyone at the OLPC core dev team is actively doing windows-related work on the XO. All work is being done on Sugar XO-OS.

    It's Microsoft's problem to make XP work on the XO.

    The MS thing was a compromise for governments who inisited on computers that run XP. Basically, it's more of "hey, if you want to run a different OS on the XO, it's your machine". The OLPC folks aren't the ones maintaining the XP version.

  31. Wheres the selfish bastard version? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

    I'll give them $200 for mine and they can keep the spare.

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    1. Re:Wheres the selfish bastard version? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      and another thing.

      What happened to the "$100 laptop"?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:Wheres the selfish bastard version? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      What happened to the "$100 laptop"?

      Inflation.

  32. that social impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is why I won't G1G1. I don't want this to go on giving MS a new captive market. If the kids grow up and use MS software on their dime, no worries. But when I'm paying toward it?

    No.

    For myself, the reasons for it would be it would be a GREAT controller of the computerised telescope. The kicks drops and dew formation won't faze it. The EEE would hate the dew. I don't think it would like the rest either.

  33. Pass on this if you wish to spread Free Software by skyphyr · · Score: 1

    Given OLPCs backflips on Free Software being included do not support this if your intent is to help spread Free Software. They could just as easily turn around and ship your "give one" with windows. And really who wants to give the "gift" of Microsoft? Well done Nicolas. You were teaching them to fish, but ultimately caved and gave them their first Microsoft fillet. Not only have you let down those you sought to help, you've irrevocably destroyed the value of your word. You have no credibility here time to move on.

  34. WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OLPC, I mean, please, come on. Just throw a computer at it, and the world's problems are solved!
     
    A stupid program created by over-zealous computer nuts and endorsed by politicians who know nothing about technology in education.
     
    I teach third grade English.

  35. Eats, roots and leaves by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Fact check: Turkey is NOT an EU member.

    Duh. Who said it was?

    For once, the summary is correct "in the EU member states, Switzerland, Russia, and Turkey." This is a list, meaning "in the EU member states AND Switzerland AND Russia and Turkey", not a definition. If it were, it would use a colon, like "in the EU member states: Switzerland, Russia, and Turkey". I mean, who would imagine that Russia was in the EU (aside from Sarah Palin)?

    1. Re:Eats, roots and leaves by carvalhao · · Score: 1

      You're right, I missread the punctuation. Me bad :)

  36. Emm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As one of the last G1G0 victims, I am watching this new rollout with skepticism.

    First, having Amazon deal with the shipping and billing should eliminate a lot of frustration but it won't eliminate the returns if OLPC hasn't done a better job in quality control. In fact, it will make returning the product much easier--I think many people put up with flaws after seeing how much trouble others had with the return process.

    Second, having had a year with my super little EEE, I, for one, have no desire to even play with an XO anymore. The bright-and-shiny-new-thing is off the XO for me and I'll bet there are plenty of other people who think this is kind of a yawner, too.

    Although many who participated in the G1G1 program and played on the resultant forums did their best to fill any naysayer with guilt, it didn't work all that great. The fact is that no G1G1 participant wasn't in it for the Get One part--if they were truly pure of heart and motive they would have donated before the G1G1 program. Or even after it started. They didn't. They wanted the little green puter with ears.

    So my prediction is that OLPC is going to be deeply disappointed with G1G1 this time. Those who participated because they wanted tiny puters either got EEE's (which fit in a medium-sized purse and weigh less than the XO) or are using cell phones for mobile internet access. And the people who participated last year won't be doing it this year.

  37. RMS gave up on OLPC... by mmu_man · · Score: 1

    Because they switched to being windows-bootable. http://bostonreview.net/BR33.6/stallman.php

  38. What's VNC, then? by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    An acronym alone doesn't tell me much.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  39. Not interested anymore by logfish · · Score: 1

    As the OLPC is nolonger "free", there is absolutely no reason to buy an OLPC instead of an ASUS Eee PC. I lost interest in the OLPC when they lost interest in my efforts. Go Richard!