Slashdot Mirror


Plasma Plants Vaporize Trash While Creating Energy

Jason Sahler writes "Recently St. Lucie County in Florida announced that it has teamed up with Geoplasma to develop the United States' first plasma gasification plant. The plant will use super-hot 10,000 degree Fahrenheit plasma to effectively vaporize 1,500 tons of trash each day, which in turn spins turbines to generate 60MW of electricity — enough to power 50,000 homes!"

11 of 618 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Environmental impact? by master5o1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, as long as it's not Carbon. Because we all know that Carbon is bad. Oxygen is good. Hydrogen, however explosive it might be, is still good because we can mix Oxygen and Hydrogen to make water, which we need. So as long as we don't have Carbon... because Carbon is damn evil. Die Carbon you element of satan! (I think I overshot my moderation target)

    --
    signature is pants
  2. The Doc is Back! by Narmacil · · Score: 5, Funny

    FINALLY! The Mr. Fusion is only a few years away!
    No longer will I need Plutonium to generate the 3.3 Jigawatts nessecary to power my Flux Capacitor.

  3. Reading and visualizing by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still asleep here, so my visualizing of this was:

    "Plasma " ok that's the hot stuff

    " plants " O, the beautiful trees, the nature... hmm, wait a second. Plasma trees? plasma grass?! What the...

    " Vaporize trash " Dear freaking gawd! trash vaposizing red hot trees?!? Scorching grassy plains to vaporise trash on?

    " While creating energy " They are self sustaining?! It's the end of the world! We're all gonna diiie!

  4. Re:seems a bit stingy by Warhawke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only person who upon reading the title had the sudden mental image of flora with glowing plasma leaves that devour trash like venus fly-traps devour flies? Whew, I need to lay off the midnight sushi...

  5. Re:Conservation of energy by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

    This process will NOT "create" energy.

    See, this is my problem with you people who put all your faith and belief behind "science", it just leads to pessimistic attitudes. I mean sure, I know it's unlikely that this system would be the exception to conservation of energy or any other principle of physics, but there's always a possibility that maybe, just maybe, plasma garbage vaporizing is where physics breaks down. So, if you want, I'll let you live in your miserable world where you're always right and nothing exciting ever happens. All I ask is that you just don't disturb me in my world, a world of imagination and possibilities, a world where anything can happen, a world where flying cars, jetpacks and sophisticated sex robots are just around the corner and yes, a world where garbage vaporizes can run amok, producing more energy than is put into them thereby destroying the universe. Screw your science, that's the world I want to live in.

  6. Re:Slow down... by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    My first thought was more directed towards destroying people without a trace. Push a guy into the machine and voila, no traces.

    --
    Me failed English...
    FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
  7. Re:Conservation of energy by dougisfunny · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because they don't have open minds.

    --
    This is not the funny you're looking for.
  8. I see the newspapers of tomorrow.. by sTERNKERN · · Score: 4, Funny

    The plant used super-hot 10,000 degree Fahrenheit plasma to generate enough power to effectively vaporize 50,000 homes creating 1,500 tons of trash.

  9. Re:OK - I'll bite by justinlee37 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do a LOT of work on refuse disposal options, principally for the UK food industry

    A back of the metaphorical fag packet calculation

    Oh, you brits and your wacky words and silly sayings. As a yank, I never cease to be amused by it.

  10. Re:Conservation of energy by CubicleView · · Score: 5, Funny

    This solves nothing, once we hit peak trash production then we'll be screwed all over again.

  11. Re:Conservation of energy by Whiteox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw your science, that's the world I want to live in

    I am intrigued by your rant and wish to subscribe to your spam.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!